Will the FRA Force Amtrak to Build Pricier High-Speed Trains?

On the Network today, Systemic Failure highlights what is apparently an ongoing dispute between Amtrak and the Federal Railroad Administration — one that could affect the development of next-gen Acela trains.

Amtrak says FRA rules will lead to higher costs for developing the next Acela. Photo: ##http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Acela_Boston_South_station.jpg##Wikimedia Commons##

Systemic Failure says Amtrak was hamstrung by federal requirements into building a custom design for the first Acela, which led to higher costs. From Amtrak:

The assumption that the standards simplify the design process of the equipment and would save $2,000,000 per train set is false. The Acela example indicates the exact opposite to be true. The FRA rules, as existing and proposed, eliminate the possibility of purchasing off-the-shelf equipment. The engineering work required to design new compliant equipment alone would far outstrip any possible savings from the rules if there were any to be had.

A recent FRA rule goes to some length to dispute Amtrak’s claim, and indicates that the FRA does not intend to ease its regulations. “This is mind boggling,” writes Systemic Failure. “Despite HSR being a top priority of the president, the FRA is still creating roadblocks.”

The FRA’s apparent hard line notwithstaning, the blog notes that the buck stops with FRA chief Joe Szabo, who seems amenable to using compatible “off-the-shelf” product for the next Acela and California high-speed rail.

Also on the Network today: Streets.MN weighs the pros and cons of subsidizing public transport; Bike Delaware notes the efficacy of bike projects as job creators; and the Political Environment laments the current state of affairs in Wisconsin, the state that originated Earth Day.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

FRA Responds: Amtrak Will Be Able to Use “Proven” Trainsets

By Tanya Snyder |
On Monday, we featured a Systemic Failure post about FRA regulations in our morning round-up from the Streetsblog Network. Systemic Failure indicated — and Streetsblog repeated — that the FRA was unwilling to change its rules to allow Amtrak to use “off-the-shelf” trainsets and other equipment. The Systemic Failure post consists almost entirely of the FRA’s own […]

FRA Safety Regs Add Costs, Not Safety, to American Rail

By Angie Schmitt |
The Federal Railroad Administration is an increasingly frequent target for Streetsblog Network members. Writers including Alon Levy at Pedestrian Observations and the mysterious “Drunk Engineer” who pens Systemic Failure have called out FRA safety regulations as irrational and out-of-date, adding unnecessary costs to rail operations and preventing the modernization of Amtrak and commuter rail systems. […]

Why Milwaukee’s New Train Platform Will Be Built at Two Heights

By Angie Schmitt |
Here’s an illuminating case study about the political and bureaucratic dysfunction that shapes transportation infrastructure in the United States. Network blog Systemic Failure notes that Milwaukee is finally rebuilding its run-down passenger rail station. New regulations require the station to provide level boarding to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. But Milwaukee […]