The Safety-in-Numbers Effect Surfaces in Minneapolis Bike Crash Data
Minneapolis's public works department just completed a rigorous, long-term analysis of bike-car collisions, and they've released a trove of data.
Bill Lindeke at Network blog Twin City Sidewalks says it might be "as good a study of crash data as you're ever likely to see in this country." There were a number of interesting findings, many of which bolstered previous research.
For example, as shown in the chart above, a confirmation of the safety-in-numbers effect popularized by researcher Peter Jacobsen:
It's long been a truism in nonmotorized transportation planning that safety improves dramatically as the overall number of bicyclists and pedestrians rise. Well, this seems to hold true for Minneapolis over the last decade, and is one of the most hope-inspiring pieces of the bicycling puzzle...
What this suggests to me is that bicycle advocates should focus their efforts on increasing the total number of cyclists. In a way, safety issues will take care of themselves once we begin to increase the overall awareness and frequency of bicycling in the Twin Cities.
Here's another takeaway from Lindeke:
Probably the single most one-sided part of the bicyclist-driver relationship is that bicyclists are the ones that suffer all the injuries. In fact, check out this snippet from the study: "Detailed analysis of 800 crash reports from 2006-2008 found that when an injury was sustained, it was always the bicyclist. Motorists sustained injuries in no crashes."
Often, when talking about urban bicycling, arguments devolve into "bike vs. car" diatribes, with each group pointing out the other's supposed misdeeds. There might be some validity to this kind of balanced framing, but it's worth remembering that only one side of this equation has any physical vulnerability. Only one side is paying the physical cost. It's the exact opposite of an equal relationship.
If only every city had the wherewithal and the motivation to monitor cycling safety so closely. In the meanwhile, less-resourced cities can likely learn a thing from this study.
Elsewhere on the Network today: Greater Greater Washington writes the United States has only five "true" bus rapid transit systems, and those five are only rated "bronze" by the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy. Streets.mn wonders why so few Twin City-area bus routes take advantage of the highway system. And the Tri-State Transportation Campaign says it's even more of a a shame that the new transportation bill reduced funding for Safe Routes to School, in light of a new New York City study that found the program significantly reduced traffic injuries and deaths among children.
Stay in touch
Sign up for our free newsletter
More from Streetsblog USA
Friday’s Headlines Are Tired Out
Whether it's from degradation or the dust resulting from wear and tear, it's becoming increasingly clear that tire and brake emissions are harmful, perhaps even exceeding tailpipe emissions.
Study: What Road Diets Mean For Older Drivers
"After a road diet, all motorists seem to drive at a rate that feels comfortable to a mildly-impaired older adult."
Op-Ed: Why Is Fare Evasion Punished More Severely than Speeding?
A.B. 819 offers California the opportunity to decriminalize fare evasion and replace punitive measures with more equitable approaches.
Talking Headways Podcast: Local Culture and Development
We chat with Tim Sprague from Phoenix about supporting local culture through development projects and the importance of sustainable development and transportation.
City of Yes Yes Yes! Adams Calls for Elimination of Parking Mandates on ALL New Housing
Mayor Adams today announced the historic end to one of the city’s most antiquated — and despised — zoning laws requiring the construction of parking with every new development.
