Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
House of Representatives

386 to 34: House Instructs Conference to Get It Done By Friday

There's no excuse for dilly-dallying.

That was the overwhelming sense of the House of Representatives, which just voted 386 to 34 that the conference should wrap up its work and pass some sort of transportation compromise by Friday.

In his floor speech on the provision, sponsor Tim Walz said if the two chambers can't agree on a compromise by Friday, the House should bring the Senate bill up for an up-or-down vote. The text of the Motion to Instruct didn't include that stipulation. This is the entirety of the Motion as voted on:

Mr. Walz of Minnesota moves that the managers on the part of the House at the conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on the Senate amendment to the bill H.R. 4348 be instructed to resolve all issues and file a conference report not later than June 22, 2012.

Many thought that the whole process would end yesterday with a meeting between House and Senate leaders, Sen. Barbara Boxer, and Rep. John Mica. But rather than being the final nail in the coffin, the huddle breathed new life into the negotiations, as the participants emerged pledging to "redouble" their efforts. Boxer said she and Mica were going to meet "for hours" to hammer out a deal.

Transportation reform advocates are holding their breath. Everyone agrees that it's far better to pass a bill -- even a deeply flawed bill -- than another extension, which would let the Highway Trust Fund run outand potentially force devastating cuts by the end of the year. But a compromise could easily mean that the Senate gives in to some of the House's key demands, like eliminating the provision that lets local agencies decide how to use funds for pedestrian and bike safety. Another item in the mix is the environmental "streamlining" provision that would make it much harder for communities to have meaningful input into new projects that would impact them.

Meanwhile, it remains to be seen how much the House will give on its non-negotiables like the Keystone XL pipeline.

Reformers are hoping the Senate won't negotiate away some of its most important achievements. Bike advocates are trying to mobilize outreach to Congressional offices, asking them to stay firm on the Cardin-Cochran amendment ensuring local control over bike-ped funds.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Friday Video: Are We All Living in a ‘Carspiracy’?

How does "car-brain" shape the way we think about the world — even in relatively bike-friendly countries like the U.K.?

July 26, 2024

Friday’s Headlines Share and Share Alike

Bikeshares, and e-bikes and scooters generally, are becoming more popular. That's led to more injuries, highlighting the need for better infrastructure.

July 26, 2024

What the Heck is Going on With the California E-Bike Incentive Program?

The program's launch has been delayed for two years, and currently "there is no specific timeline" for it. Plus the administrator, Pedal Ahead, is getting dragged, but details are vague.

July 26, 2024

Talking Headways Podcast: Have Cities Run Out of Land?

Chris Redfearn of USC and Anthony Orlando of Cal Poly Pomona on why "pro-business" Texas housing markets are catching up to "pro-regulation" California and what it might mean for future city growth.

July 25, 2024

The Paris Plan for Olympic Traffic? Build More Bike Lanes

A push to make Paris fully bikable for the Olympics is already paying dividends long before the opening ceremonies.

July 25, 2024
See all posts