Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In

Another day, another questionable proposal to enhance cyclist "safety."

Last week brought news that a New York City councilman has proposed legislation requiring licensure for cyclists. Then there was the proposal to ban cycling with child passengers in Oregon and another licensure call in New Jersey -- both thankfully dismissed.

Now a new bill has made its way into the Oregon statehouse and, once again, it conveniently sidesteps the foremost risk to cyclists: cars. Democratic Representative Michael Schaufler has proposed up to a $90 fine for cyclists caught in the deviant act of listening to headphones.

false

Jonathan Maus at Network blog Bike Portland has all the details:

Like Rep. Mitch Greenlick, who said he proposed the six-and-under biking ban out of a concern for safety, Schaufler is also motivated by safety. He told me last week that "I just saw some guy driving down the street on their bike with their headphones on and thought, 'He could get run over.' It's a safety issue. It's pretty cut and dry. It's a very simple, very basic concept."

What's interesting about this proposal is that, the way it's currently written, it would create an entirely new violation — "unsafe operation of a bicycle" — in the vehicle code. If passed, it's possible that additional provisions could be added to this law in the name of safety. Another thing to keep in mind is that, because of the way our current cell phone law is worded, it's unclear whether or not it applies to bicycle operators.

As for Rep. Schaufler, he's reportedly frustrated with "the online opposition from cyclists." Here's what he told the Willamette Week recently:

"They (cyclists) are the ones that are complaining about it,” Schaufler said. “People on bicycles ask for a whole lot and then they say, ‘don’t regulate us!’"

Maus has been soliciting comments from Bike Portland readers, who have made some interesting points. Would lawmakers better protect cyclists by trying to cut down on distractions for motorists -- including, for instance, car audio systems?

Elsewhere on the Network today: Copenhagenize discusses an especially ludicrous idea -- banning winter cycling -- put forth by newspaper commenters in Ontario. Ecocity Publicity Mobility introduces a new comic book illustrating car-free transportation options from around the world (you can see it in electronic form too). And American Dirt comments on the ubiquity of asphalt in America and its surprising effect on the natural environment.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Tuesday’s Headlines Have Unintended Consequences

President Trump's tariffs are pushing people to buy smaller cars or forgo driving altogether in favor of transit.

May 6, 2025

Where Does ‘Motonormativity’ Come From — And Which Country Has It Worst? 

A new study explores how "motonormativity" shows up in the US, UK, and (yes) even in the Netherlands — and where we should apply pressure if we want to change our unspoken attitudes about how we move.

May 6, 2025

Elon Musk Is Hiring the Same Lobbying Firms That Represent Your Transit Agency

Weak ethics laws allow dozens of lobbying firms to work for both Elon Musk's companies and the cities, transit agencies, and climate philanthropies he and DOGE are attacking — and some advocates think it's time for them to pick a side.

May 5, 2025

Monday’s Headlines Keep Us Divided

Physically divided — remember the Biden administration's efforts, insufficient as they were, to reconnect communities divided by Urban Renewal highways? Republicans are trying to get rid of all that.

May 5, 2025
See all posts