The Fiscal Argument for Transportation Reform

We knew this election was going to have big repercussions for the future of our national transportation system.

Republicans will take the House and its committee chairmanships. And the winners of governors races in Ohio, Wisconsin and Florida have threatened to torpedo their segments in a proposed network of faster intercity rail.

The case for reform kind of makes itself, doesn't it? Photo: ##http://www.saidaonline.com/en/news.php?go=fullnews&newsid=14670##SaidaOnline##

There will be fits and starts on the long journey toward overhauling transportation policy in this country. But in an era of energy uncertainty and crumbling infrastructure, the single occupancy vehicle is an unsustainable, expensive and inefficient way for people to move. Transportation reformers have the stronger arguments to be made.

So today we bring you some information that may come in handy when your governor starts a high-pitched campaign against investing in transit. Or when the House starts debating the transportation bill. Remember, roads require a hefty public subsidy, writes Fairfax Advocates for Better Bicycling.

The FABB blog brings us this excerpt from Todd Litman of the Victoria Transportation Policy Institute:

According to the U.S. Consumer Expenditure Survey, in 2008 U.S. motorists spent on average approximately $2,700 per vehicle on ownership expenses (purchase, registration, insurance, etc.) and $1,400 on fuel and oil, about $4,100 in total. That year, governments spent $181 billion to build and maintain roadways (more if you include traffic services such as policing and emergency response), or about $730 annually per registered motor vehicle. Less than half of these roadway expenses are paid by motor vehicle user fees, the rest are borne through general taxes.

A typical urban parking space costs $5,000 to $25,000 to construct, resulting in $500 to $1,500 in annualized construction and operating costs. There are estimated to be at least three off-street parking spaces per vehicle worth about $3,000 annually in total per vehicle. This indicates that most vehicles are worth less than the road and parking infrastructure required for their use. For each dollar that a motorist spends on their vehicle, governments, businesses and consumers must spend at least another dollar to provide roads and parking facilities for their use.

If motorists were to pay directly for these facilities, as required for efficiency and equity, their user charges would approximately double.

It’s hard to argue with that, especially from the standpoint of fiscal responsibility. That doesn’t mean emboldened believers in highways won’t try. Advocates for sustainable transportation will need to keep their wits about them and their facts close in the coming political climate.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Rebuilding Place in the Urban Space reminds readers that central cities’ advantage over the suburbs lies in the quality of the “street experience.” Matt Yglesias crunches the numbers for national rail development and decides it’s a bargain. And Milwaukee Rising explores how urban water policy could fuel sprawl.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Transportation for America Releases Blueprint for Transportation Reform

|
Today Transportation for America is releasing a 100-page document called "The Route to Reform," in which they outline policy recommendations related to the upcoming reauthorization of federal transportation funding legislation (download the executive summary here or the full report here).  From the executive summary:  The next transportation program must set about the urgent task of […]

Obama Adviser Proves it: Transportation Reform is Health Reform

|
Over the summer, Streetsblog Capitol Hill published a riff on the rhetorical stylings of White House budget director Peter Orszag that coined a new phrase: "Transportation reform is health reform." The logic behind the principle stems from the health benefits of walking and biking, but also from the simple truth that fewer miles driven represents […]

An Orszag-ian Principle: Transportation Reform is Health Reform

|
During the Washington budget debate earlier this year, a phrase widely attributed to White House budget director Peter Orszag was rolling off many a reporter’s keyboard: "Health reform is entitlement reform." Orszag’s idea, in a nutshell, is that controlling the nation’s skyrocketing health care costs, which are fueled in part by the obesity epidemic, would […]

CNU Summit to Focus on Reforming Transportation, Planning Principles

|
The Congress for the New Urbanism will meet in Portland, Oregon, in early November for the annual Project for Transportation Reform, a summit to further define and clarify emerging urban transportation policies that embrace entire networks, rather than interdependent transportation segments, and that seek to balance modal transportation splits and reduce overall vehicular miles traveled […]

Centers for Disease Control: Transportation Reform is Health Reform

|
The connection between transportation and public health has slowly edged into the mainstream since Streetsblog Capitol Hill began covering it last year, first through a billion-dollar grant program added to Congress’ sprawling health care bill and now in a Centers for Disease Control (CDC) brief that connects existing U.S. infrastructure with chronic disease, obesity, and […]

AARP Joins Campaign to Reform National Transpo Policy

|
Photo: AARP AARP announced today that it will join the Transportation for America campaign to advocate for a "broad restructuring" of national transportation policy. In a letter sent to Congressional leaders last week [PDF], AARP said that it is "working to enable older adults to live independently in their homes and communities throughout their lifespan, […]