Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Federal Stimulus

Transit Creates As Many Jobs As Roads — But it Could Do Even Better

Members of Congress remain intensely focused on health care this fall, but as the unemployment rate hits double digits in more states, their No. 2 priority is best summed up in three words: Jobs, jobs, jobs.

House Democrats held a job-creation powwow yesterday that gave transportation committee chairman Jim Oberstar (D-MN) an opening to press yet again for speedy enactment of his long-term infrastructure bill as a means to boost hiring. And transit advocates lent their voice to that call today, releasing a report [PDF] on the green jobs generated by investment in rail and buses.

Today's report, released by the American Public Transportation Association (APTA) offers a definitive completion of the Washington idiom that estimates how many jobs would be created by $1 billion of federal spending. Lawmakers in both parties have used several different versions of that idiom for highway spending -- "$1 billion for roads would create ____ jobs" -- but the Federal Highway Administration's official number was 30,000 in 2007 dollars.

The current mixture of federal aid to transit also generates 30,000 jobs per $1 billion spent, according to APTA's report, produced by Cambridge Systematics and the Economic Development Research Group. But that total results from the 69-31 federal split between transit capital expenses (i.e. new equipment and tracks) and transit operating expenses (i.e. hiring folks to run the networks).

Washington is currently barred from helping with operating costs for transit agencies in areas where the population exceeds 200,000, a rule that some in Congress are hoping to overturn.

What would the job-creation mix look like if the federal government gave extra aid to transit operating? Check out the chart below:

transit_chart.png(Chart: APTA)


In other words, the more federal aid freed up for transit operating costs, the stronger the job-creation potential. And that's just one of the economic upsides magnified by a greater emphasis on operating aid; APTA's report found that $1 billion for transit operating generates $1.8 billion in take-home employee income, which in turn produces more tax revenue for the government.

The Highway Administration, by contrast, found that $1 billion in road spending generated employee income that ranged from $1.06 billion to $1.15 billion.

Given those numbers, one might think Congress would relax its restrictions on transit operating aid. And lawmakers have done something -- but it's limited to 10 percent of money distributed by the stimulus law.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Tuesday’s Headlines Pay Through the Nose

Why does a bus cost Cincinnati $937,000, while Singapore spends $333,000? David Zipper has the answer.

September 30, 2025

More Transit Means Safer Streets

Promoting transit isn't just a social good. It's also a tool to achieve Vision Zero.

September 30, 2025

Newsom Names GM CEO Mary Barra as Villain in Fight with Feds over Air Quality

Car company executives make good rhetorical foils. But they can't be held responsible for the state's shortcomings.

September 29, 2025

Monday’s Headlines Go on Offense

The "defensive driving" they teach in driver's ed has now turned into "defensive walking," and one car website has had it with victim-blaming.

September 29, 2025

States Have More Power Than They Think to Fund Sustainable Transportation

As the Trump administration claws back money for sustainable modes, states have a big opportunity to fill the gap.

September 29, 2025

Advocates: Congress Must Stop Trump From Illegally Holding Back Sustainable Transportation Funds

Congress has a chance to restore order, seize back their power of the purse, and stop Trump from "pocket-rescinding" hundreds of millions for good transportation projects.

September 26, 2025
See all posts