Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Federal Stimulus

Transit Creates As Many Jobs As Roads — But it Could Do Even Better

Members of Congress remain intensely focused on health care this fall, but as the unemployment rate hits double digits in more states, their No. 2 priority is best summed up in three words: Jobs, jobs, jobs.

House Democrats held a job-creation powwow yesterday that gave transportation committee chairman Jim Oberstar (D-MN) an opening to press yet again for speedy enactment of his long-term infrastructure bill as a means to boost hiring. And transit advocates lent their voice to that call today, releasing a report [PDF] on the green jobs generated by investment in rail and buses.

Today's report, released by the American Public Transportation Association (APTA) offers a definitive completion of the Washington idiom that estimates how many jobs would be created by $1 billion of federal spending. Lawmakers in both parties have used several different versions of that idiom for highway spending -- "$1 billion for roads would create ____ jobs" -- but the Federal Highway Administration's official number was 30,000 in 2007 dollars.

The current mixture of federal aid to transit also generates 30,000 jobs per $1 billion spent, according to APTA's report, produced by Cambridge Systematics and the Economic Development Research Group. But that total results from the 69-31 federal split between transit capital expenses (i.e. new equipment and tracks) and transit operating expenses (i.e. hiring folks to run the networks).

Washington is currently barred from helping with operating costs for transit agencies in areas where the population exceeds 200,000, a rule that some in Congress are hoping to overturn.

What would the job-creation mix look like if the federal government gave extra aid to transit operating? Check out the chart below:

transit_chart.png(Chart: APTA)


In other words, the more federal aid freed up for transit operating costs, the stronger the job-creation potential. And that's just one of the economic upsides magnified by a greater emphasis on operating aid; APTA's report found that $1 billion for transit operating generates $1.8 billion in take-home employee income, which in turn produces more tax revenue for the government.

The Highway Administration, by contrast, found that $1 billion in road spending generated employee income that ranged from $1.06 billion to $1.15 billion.

Given those numbers, one might think Congress would relax its restrictions on transit operating aid. And lawmakers have done something -- but it's limited to 10 percent of money distributed by the stimulus law.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Talking Headways Podcast: The Lost Subways of North America

Author Jake Berman discusses transit histories through the lens of racial dynamics, monopolies, ballot measures and overlooked cities.

January 15, 2026

A ‘Demographic Time Bomb’ Is About To Go Off — And the Transportation Sector Isn’t Ready

A top firm is warning that the "silver tsunami" will have big implications for the climate, unless U.S. communities act fast.

January 15, 2026

Thursday’s Headlines Shoot for the Moon

What if the U.S. spent anything near what it spends on highways on transit instead?

January 15, 2026

Is it Time to Try Congestion Pricing in San Francisco?

Congestion pricing has been an unqualified success in New York (and lots of other places). Why wouldn't it work elsewhere?

January 14, 2026

Analysis: What It Would Take To Put America First in Transit Again

No, it won't be easy. Yes, it can be done.

January 14, 2026
See all posts