Think Tank Responds to Report on Hidden Costs of Fossil Fuels: Yawn

The National Academy of Science’s new report on the hidden health costs of U.S. reliance on fossil fuels has generated high-profile media coverage around the country, most of it focusing on the $62 billion annual estimate for coal rather than the $56 billion projection for vehicles.

CarExhaust.jpg(Photo: SILive.com)

But Greenwire’s write-up is particularly interesting, if only for its responses from the National Mining Association and the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a conservative and climate-denying D.C. think tank that has taken $2 million from Exxon Mobil this decade. From the Greenwire piece (sub.req’d.):

"Energy production from fossil fuels causes air
pollution, which damages people’s health and welfare. That was big news
— in the 1970s," Marlo Lewis, a senior fellow at the Competitive
Enterprise Institute, wrote in an e-mail. "Did we really need a
346-page study with more than 50 expert contributors to tell us that?" …

"That aside, without energy, we’d all freeze in the dark," Lewis added.
"The net cost of not having energy vastly outweighs the supposed
‘hidden’ costs."

Interestingly, Lewis’ quip about "the net cost of not having energy" was similar in substance from the that of the Mining Association, which asserted that "the health and welfare benefits" of burning coal for electricity "clearly outweigh the cost."

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

New Study Shows $56 Billion in Hidden Health Damage from Autos

|
Transportation’s effects on public health are rarely discussed by policy-makers, but they remain very real — and the National Research Council (NRC) put a number on them today, reporting that cars and trucks have about $56 billion in "hidden" health costs that are not reflected in the price of oil or electricity. (Photo: MetroDCLiving.com) In […]

Times Says: We Must Pay More for Fossil Fuels

|
The New York Times published an editorial today about "an unpleasant and inescapable truth: any serious effort to fight [global] warming will require everyone to pay more for energy." The piece then goes on to dismiss carbon taxes as politically unfeasible, and discusses the merits of cap-and-trade systems, emphasizing that in order to work, they […]