It’s Not Just Trump: House GOP Members Ramp Up Road-Building Campaign

Bill Shuster, head of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. Photo: House T&I Committee
Bill Shuster, head of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. Photo: House T&I Committee

Taking a cue from Donald Trump, the leader of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee is making a push for an infrastructure spending spree, even though the current federal transportation funding law doesn’t expire for several years.

Last week committee chair Bill Shuster, a Pennsylvania Republican, kicked off a campaign called “Building a 21st Century Infrastructure” with a hearing featuring testimony from freight shippers, carmakers, equipment manufacturers, and other interests that reap rewards from more road spending.

The campaign is still in the hype phase. We know that the highway building industry is excited, but no specific policy proposal has been announced. So far what Shuster’s committee has released is a list of vague “principles”:

  • Make smart investments, consistent with the fundamental federal role, to ensure a modern, efficient U.S. transportation infrastructure.
  • Leverage resources from all levels of government and the private sector.
  • Recognize, promote, and develop integrated transportation systems.
  • Empower state and local governments.
  • Encourage technological solutions and promote innovation.
  • Reduce regulatory burdens on U.S. businesses.
  • Streamline and cut federal government red tape to expedite transportation projects.

These principles are laced with code phrases. In conservative orthodoxy, for instance, “the fundamental federal role” does not include spending on transit. Meanwhile, “empowering state and local governments” implies weakening federal oversight of highway-centric state DOTs — which could erode progress U.S. DOT made during the Obama administration.

The document does contain one explicit reference to “inadequate” “public transit and rail transportation,” but otherwise the language is standard boilerplate that refers to accelerated highway construction. With Senate Democrats talking about making common cause with the White House on infrastructure spending, advocates will have to guard against a new road-building binge.

More recommended reading today: Urban Milwaukee teases out trends in rural economies that might have helped elect Trump in Wisconsin. And the Political Environment reports that Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, facing fiscal pressures, has scaled back an unpopular highway widening in Milwaukee.

  • Larry Littlefield

    Of course the difference is, this is money that won’t be paid for with the gas tax.

    Anyone where still in favor of federal spending. The federal government taxed the cities to build segregated suburbs, destroying the cities. Within the cities, the places with more federal intervention declined the fastest. The cities that had not completely collapsed when Reagan cut back on federal subsidies for infrastructure, and allowed flexibility with the rest.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Congress Takes First Steps on Obama’s Transpo Budget: The Details

|
The House panel in charge of annual transportation spending has begun work on a bill that increases transit funding while providing $150 million for D.C.’s cash-strapped Metro and $150 million for the Obama administration’s inter-agency push for "sustainable communities." Rep. John Olver (D-MA), chief of the House transport spending committee (Photo: Wikimedia) The Federal Transit […]

McClatchy Muckrakers Expose Seedy Underbelly of the Highway Bonanza

|
The work of a sustainable transportation reporter can be a lonely lot. But it’s a lot less lonely now that two McClatchy reporters, Curtis Tate and Greg Gordon, have taken up the mantle of exposing wasteful road expansion. With their far-reaching and well-researched three-part series, published last Sunday, Tate and Gordon brought stories of highway […]

Could Transportation Spending Become a Core Conservative Value?

|
Sen. James Inhofe has always said that, although he’s one of the most conservative members of the Senate, he’s a “big spender” on two things: national security and infrastructure. An influential conservative group appears to be humming the same tune. The American Conservative Union is the 50-year-old organization behind the annual Conservative Political Action Conference […]