Will U.S. DOT Get Serious About Climate Change? Here’s Cause for Optimism.

Photo: Joe Mabel/Wikipedia
A new federal rule may change the way states measure the environmental impact of highway sprawl. Photo: Joe Mabel/Wikipedia

Last fall, national environmental advocates sat down with officials from U.S. DOT to talk about how federal transportation policy can address climate change.

There is wild variation between state transportation departments when it comes to green transportation policy. Some of the more sophisticated agencies, like California’s and Oregon’s, are starting to factor greenhouse gas emissions into their transportation plans. Most are content to keep on expanding highways and supporting development patterns that are disastrous for the climate. There are no federal incentives to nudge states in a better direction.

Environmental advocates saw an opportunity in the 2012 transportation bill, called MAP-21. U.S. DOT was in the process of drafting new rules, mandated by MAP-21, requiring transportation agencies to assess their performance on several fronts. By having state and regional transportation agencies track and report progress on objectives like reducing traffic fatalities, the thinking went, improvements would follow.

Transportation-related carbon emissions seemed like a logical metric to include, so the environmental advocates made their case to U.S. DOT. They lined up letters of support from the Minnesota, California, and Pennsylvania departments of transportation, from 16 members of Congress, and from the National Association of City Transportation Officials, among others.

“To their credit, the [Obama] Administration, they put this out there as one of the items that they want to work on,” said Deron Lovaas of the Natural Resources Defense Council, one of the organizations leading the campaign. “It’s a legacy item for this presidency. It’s part of the climate agenda.”

In April, U.S. DOT released a 400-page draft of proposed federal rules to assess states’ performance on congestion management. Appended was a short, six-page section posing 13 questions about how the agency should measure climate impacts.

The proposed congestion metrics were a disappointment, however, because they didn’t do enough to change standard practice — which rewards road projects that generate more traffic. And the short section on climate impacts didn’t live up to expectations that had been raised by press leaks from Obama administration officials.

But Lovaas is confident that when all is said and done, U.S. DOT will enact effective reporting requirements about the climate impacts of transportation systems.

“This is a legacy issue for the secretary of transportation and the president,” he said. “It’s not about kicking the can down the road.”

The climate change rule could be an important corrective to older federal environmental standards, which often lead to perverse results. Air quality standards, for instance, justify road widening projects because they only consider the short-term reduction in traffic back-ups in a very localized area, not the long-term effect of building car-dependent sprawl everywhere.

The new rule, said Lovaas, can be more sophisticated, shifting the focus from “what happens with [individual] projects” to “what’s happening with this portfolio of investment.”

It’s important for advocates to weigh in and tell U.S. DOT how the final rule should be crafted, Lovaas said. “They’ve asked 13 questions and I think they’re all serious questions.”

  • thielges

    Bad link to the USDOT website. Should be: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tpm/rule/pm3_nprm.cfm

  • AndrewGalford90278

    Thanks a lot, this really is a truly awsome article! I am sure there are many people who are faced with the same problems I recently had. I couldn’t find I just filled out IRS 2220 with an online software. It looked much better typed than hand-written. I used http://goo.gl/NdMGAi and it’s very easy to use.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

You Can Help Make State DOTs Accountable for How They Spend

|
Pressure is mounting on the president and Congress to keep roads and bridges from falling apart by increasing transportation funding. But a big part of the problem is states, which receive the lion’s share of federal transportation funds but opt to spend most on new roads, instead of maintaining existing infrastructure. Between 2009 and 2011, states spent just […]

FHWA Helps Cities and Towns Land Bike/Ped Funding

|
American cities and towns should get a leg up on using federal funds to make streets safer for biking and walking, thanks to rules enacted yesterday by the Federal Highway Administration. MAP-21, the current transportation law, was passed hurriedly enough that not all the i’s could be dotted and t’s could be crossed — and […]

The Feds Want to Reform the Cult of “Level of Service”

|
“What you measure is what you get,” the saying goes. That’s certainly true for transportation policy. And for a very long time one metric has reigned supreme on American streets: “Level of Service,” a system that assigns letter grades based on motorist delay. Roughly speaking, a street with free-flowing traffic gets an A while one where […]

Same.gov: A Transportation Secretary Who’s Hard to Believe In

|
On Monday, Obama announced his "green dream team." Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood wasn’t there. We’ve been calling around to Congressional staffers, advocates and insiders to get a better sense of what Obama’s appointment of Ray LaHood as transportation secretary means for those pushing for sustainable transport, smart growth, livable streets. While no one is giving […]