Will Maryland Gov-Elect Larry Hogan Kill the Red and Purple Lines?

The Purple Line, which Governor-elect Larry Hogan has threatened to kill, is seen as key to Montgomery County’s long-term economic viability.

Seeing shovel-ready transit projects destroyed by petty politics has been all too common the last few years (see: Scott Walker and Wisconsin high-speed rail, or Chris Christie and the ARC tunnel). Even so, this one’s a doozy.

The fate of two of the country's biggest planned transit projects rest in this man's hands: Maryland Governor-Elect Larry Hogan. Photo: Wikipedia
Larry Hogan. Photo: Wikipedia

Maryland Governor-elect Larry Hogan has the power to halt two major urban transit projects that have the planning and funding all lined up and and are all but ready to go: suburban DC’s 16-mile Purple Line as well as Baltimore’s 14-mile Red Line. More than a decade of planning has gone into each of these transit lines, and each has been awarded a competitive federal New Starts grant for $900 million [PDF], accounting for about a third of the total $5.5 billion combined cost.

Early in his gubernatorial campaign, Hogan promised to kill the projects, saying the money would be better spent on roads and that the western, eastern, and southern parts of the state deserved more attention. But closer to the election he moderated his views, saying the lines were “worth considering.”

Since winning the race, he has mostly kept mum about his intentions. When asked recently about the plans, he demurred, according to the Washington Post.

“They should just keep on guessing, because I’m going to be governor January 21, and we will start talking about policy then,” he said.

Although Hogan won’t take office for a few weeks yet, his indecision is already affecting construction timetables. Bids were due this month for the Purple Line project, but were delayed until March, after the swearing-in.

Maryland spent more than $170 million planning and purchasing right-of-way for the Purple Line and another $230+ million on planning for the Red Line. That work will go to waste if the projects are killed. Plus, because the Red Line has already gone out to bid, the state would be responsible for another $8 million in payments to the engineering firms that have prepared detailed, long-term plans to build the line.

Of the most concern to transit advocates is all the federal funding that would likely be lost if the state were to abandon or dramatically alter the plans at this late stage. In addition to the New Starts grant, the Purple Line has received $900 million in federally backed loans. None of the federal money could be used for other projects in the state.

Business groups in both the DC area and Baltimore strongly support the projects and have been urging the governor to continue with the plan.

Klaus Philipsen, a Baltimore architect who served as a consultant and planner on the Red Line, said dirt could start flying this year in Baltimore. The $2.9 billion Red Line was expected to not just attract new passengers, but greatly expand the usefulness of the city’s existing two rail lines by creating a more extensive network. It was also expected to be a boon for struggling west Baltimore, where intensive community planning processes sought to get the most out of the stations for local neighborhoods.

“The hope is that with the Red Line [Baltimore’s rail transit] would start to become a real system and we’d have a quantum leap in connectivity,” Philipsen told Streetsblog.

Meanwhile, a gas tax hike approved by lawmakers has been netting the state’s Transportation Trust Fund an additional $600 million annually, more than enough to pay for the projects, said Philipsen. He doesn’t think the governor’s claims about the state lacking the funding to proceed hold up.

It’s possible Hogan is just posturing to put himself in a good position for budget negotiations and he’ll back down on these two projects, says David Moon, a former leader of the Purple Line Now advocacy group and currently a state delegate-elect, representing portions of suburban Maryland along the proposed line. “That’s what I’m hoping,” he told Streetsblog.

On the other hand, Hogan might decide to table both projects. There haven’t been many clues.

In one remark, Hogan asserted that the Purple Line and the Red Line are “night and day,” but Moon said it isn’t at all clear which one he might be more supportive of. So it’s possible he could elect to kill one of the projects but not the other.

In a more optimistic scenario, over the next few years, state leaders may have to jockey over how big a portion the state contributes to the projects. That’s okay, says Moon, as long as federal grants aren’t jeopardized.

Even if Hogan were to call for the termination of both projects, Moon says he doesn’t think that would be the end of it.

“I think that means we’re in for a very acrimonious legislative session,” he said.

Nixing one or both the projects could have long-term repercussions for the state’s economy — which is driven in large part by the economies of the DC and Baltimore regions. And these two regions hold a great deal of seats in the legislature.

David Alpert wrote at Greater Greater Washington that without major transit investments, Maryland’s segment of the DC region seems to be falling behind Virginia’s, which recently saw the opening of the Silver Line. On local blog Maryland Juice, former county planning chair Gus Bauman wrote last summer that the expansion of transit in Northern Virginia represents “a tipping point” that threatens Montgomery County’s economic future if it fails to keep up.

  • N

    A large opportunity was missed to get this in under O’Malley. This isn’t just an issue with Hogan, but numerous bum legislators in previous years that were giving these projects a hard time

  • Andres Dee

    > But closer to the election he moderated his views, saying the lines were “worth considering.”

    Translation:
    “Build it and run it in such a way that it has marginal utility (see NJT’s RiverLine or ACRL). It perpetuates transit’s role and image (outside of major metros) as mode of last resort rather than mode of choice. It silences any calls for further waste of taxpayer dollars on transit. Otherwise, folks won’t aspire to become car owners.”
    (/sarc)

  • douglasawillinger

    The sentiments that helped elect Hogan may be connected to the massive ‘demappings’ of the Washington, D.C. freeway system that had been massively re routed and redesigned in response to popular sentiment against needlessly destructive highway projects:

    http://wwwtripwithinthebeltway.blogspot.com/2015/01/developers-bogus-argument-for-purple.html

  • Mike M

    Yeah, there just isn’t any truth whatsoever to this claim. Residents of Montgomery and Prince George’s counties are supportive of building more mass transit and against highway expansion. As you say yourself, “popular sentiment.”

    The people who elected Hogan don’t live in the DC area. MoCo and PG still went overwhelmingly for Brown, despite his incredibly lackluster campaign (which showed in the turnouts for these counties). The people that really elected Hogan live in suburban Baltimore (Anne Arundel, Baltimore, and Howard counties).

  • Alan

    Can’t imagine he will kill the Purple Line, he would get a lot of pushback from Montgomery and PG counties. Red Line I’m more worried about. I suspect he will delay the project as much as possible which will probably end up costing more money in the end.

  • douglasawillinger

    Those may support more transit, I do, but if you were right about the doctrinaire opposition to any more highways, than would it have been possible to have built the ICC?

  • Mike M

    A lot of people were pretty vehemently opposed to that project. Not a coincidence that it took a Republican governor to jumpstart the project.

    Anyways, the point is that you’re totally wrong about highways in the DC area being a reason that Hogan was elected. There isn’t even a shred of evidence to support that, and it doesn’t even make sense as a hypothesis.

  • douglasawillinger

    Highways were opposed when the design impacts were high, and when people actually thought about the proposals, unlike later when they became opposed for political reasons that point the finger at the problem:

    http://wwwtripwithinthebeltway.blogspot.com/2007/02/doctrinaire-anti-new-highways-position.html

    http://wwwtripwithinthebeltway.blogspot.com/2012/01/crafted-controversy-scuttling-of-jfks-b.html

  • Moral Majority Rising

    Not even in office yet and already they are writing hit-pieces against him.

  • neroden

    Hogan is the head of a commercial real estate brokerage firm. If he has *the slightest bit of business sense at all*, he will back both the Purple and the Red Line — they will be very good for business (as the business groups have said), but especially good for *real estate developers*, which he really should understand.

    But then, it’s hard to tell whether he’s smart or not.

  • neroden

    Alternate translation:
    “Let’s see how much profit can be made for commercial real estate brokers if we build these lines.”
    (Look up what Hogan’s day job is.)

  • Alex

    Wait, you seriously think this is a “hit piece”? A hit piece would go off speculating that Hogan will kill the projects and lambast him for actions he hasn’t yet take. Instead they look at what he’s said on the matter and stated their ideological viewpoint on the matter. That’s pretty far from a “hit piece”.

  • Eric Holmes

    There are some serious errors in this article. First off, neither project “has been awarded a competitive federal New Starts grant for $900 million accounting for about a third of the total $5.5 billion combined cost.” all that happened in the budget is that the President indicated that if Maryland completed all of its requirements, FTA would give the grant. Each project has a ton of stuff to do — whether the new governor supports them or not. They are very far away from getting grant agreements. And let’s face it, the only reason those two projects showed up in the President’s budget was to placate Senator Mikulski. With her out of her Chairmanship, there is a whole lot less muscle for these.

    Second, this whole thing about the $8 million is misleading. People keep making it sound as if the project doesn’t go ahead, it will cost $8 million. Even if the project goes ahead, the three loosing bidders will each get $2 million, so its only an additional $2 million that will be lost. Given that it is a $3.6 billion project, the idea of loosing $2 million — or .05% of the project costs, hardly seems like a deterrent.

    I like these projects — especially the Purple Line — but the description in this article is far from truthful

  • lunartree

    It’s not a hit piece. It’s educating voters not to elect an idiot.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Tentative Good News for Maryland's Purple and Red Lines

|
Since Republican Larry Hogan was elected governor in November, transit advocates in Maryland have been holding their breath. During the campaign, Hogan threatened to kill the mostly-funded and ready-to-go Red Line in Baltimore and the Purple Line in the DC suburbs — two of the biggest transit projects on tap in the U.S. A budget […]

Tentative Good News for Maryland’s Purple and Red Lines

|
Since Republican Larry Hogan was elected governor in November, transit advocates in Maryland have been holding their breath. During the campaign, Hogan threatened to kill the mostly-funded and ready-to-go Red Line in Baltimore and the Purple Line in the DC suburbs — two of the biggest transit projects on tap in the U.S. A budget […]

Transit Scrooge Larry Hogan Wants to Spend $10B on DC-Baltimore Maglev

|
Maryland Governor Larry Hogan has criticized the Purple Line and Red Line light rail projects, planned for Montgomery County and Baltimore, respectively, as too costly. Though he’s threatened to kill long-standing plans to expand the real-life DC and Baltimore transit systems, Hogan is totally into a flashy and very pricey non-existent project. David Alpert at Greater […]

Transit Scrooge Larry Hogan Wants to Spend $10B on DC-Baltimore Maglev

|
Maryland Governor Larry Hogan has criticized the Purple Line and Red Line light rail projects, planned for Montgomery County and Baltimore, respectively, as too costly. Though he’s threatened to kill long-standing plans to expand the real-life DC and Baltimore transit systems, Hogan is totally into a flashy and very pricey non-existent project. David Alpert at Greater […]