Today’s Headlines

  • BRT for People not Cars

    Regarding “How to Not Kill Bus Rapid Transit” (GGW):

    These self-styled BRT “standards” seem to reflect an auto-first way of thinking:
    “Stations, placed at intersections, leave insufficient space for free
    left turns (the equivalent of free right turns in the U.S.), and
    left-turning vehicles yielding to pedestrians back up traffic.”

    No, the “space” for free left turns in India (right turns in the U.S.) can come from having a dedicated
    pedestrian-only crossing phase in the signal cycle, or from timing a
    protected left turn (right turn) signal phase before the cross traffic with the bus.

    “If bus stations are set away from intersections, as recommended here, transfers at points where lines cross are inconvenient.”

    Very true: by making the BRT less convenient for passengers, these “standards” make its failure more likely.

    “This raises a point (perhaps an obvious one, but as I live on the
    other side of the river I’ve not been following the BRT discussion): how
    will provisions be made for turning across the bus lane? And what about
    for pedestrians? For the latter I’d be an advocate of some kind of
    pedestrian bridge crossing.”

    Pedestrian bridges are often not for pedestrians, for whom they often
    represent a gross inconvenience of extra time and effort spent going up
    and down in a confined space that is vulnerable to crime, but rather to
    allow more cars to go through at a higher rate of speed.

    Plus, these bridges are absurdly expensive in the United States,
    because the Americans with Disabilities Act has led agencies to include
    elevators on both sides in order to avoid liability. One planned
    pedestrian bridge over a normal street intersection in Los Angeles
    (Lankershim/Campo de Cahuenga) is estimated to cost $19 million! How
    much bus transit can that buy? Depending on an agency’s cost structure, over 200,000 revenue service hours!

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Today’s Headlines

|
GOP Platform Officially Adopts Agenda 21 Fearmongering (Atlantic Cities, NYT) The Practical Problem With Cars: They Take Up Space (GGW) Upcoming Bike League Webinar: How to Win Bike Funding Under MAP-21 Columbus, Mississippi Considers Public Transit (AP) How Distorted Subway Maps Affect Our Choices (Smithsonian) Houston Dives Into Car-Sharing (AutoblogGreen) Google Maps Adds Voice Directions […]

Today’s Headlines

|
Planners in Maine Say They Were Forced to Approve Highway Project (Bangor Daily News) Inspectors: 10 “Segments of Concern” on Metro’s Six Rail Lines (WaPo) New Map Shows the Most Stressful Places for Cyclists in D.C. (WaPo) Salt Lake City Fire Department Assures Residents Street With Bike Lanes Is Safe (Salt Lake Trib) Caltrans Launches […]

Retrofitting the Suburban Strip

|
Many an urban thinker has pondered how to retrofit the suburbs for an age of energy scarcity. With so much car-oriented development already built, the question often arises: Is sprawl fixable? In an article recently published on Planetizen, Galina Tachieva made the case for repairing sprawl by filling in large suburban lots with townhouses and […]

Cyclists Are Special, and They Should Have Their Own Rules

|
There’s a line of reasoning advanced by the media, angry motorists and, sometimes, cyclists, that goes something like: Since some cyclists don’t follow the rules, cyclists don’t deserve respect. A version of this axiom was repeated yesterday by Sarah Goodyear at Atlantic Cities, in an article titled “Cyclists Aren’t ‘Special,’ and They Shouldn’t Play by Their […]

How Far Should Bike and Transit Advocates Take Their Alliance?

|
In Portland, a political marriage has been brokered between biking and transit advocates. The two forces, once separate, have united under the heading “active transportation.” This year the Oregon Bike Summit changed its name to the “Active Transportation Summit,” and many of the workshops focused on the collaborative power of these complementary modes. Michael Anderson […]