New Survey Shows Overwhelming Support for Federal Investment in Bike-Ped

Image: ##http://www.americabikes.org/2012survey?utm_campaign=pc_release1&recruiter_id=943&utm_medium=email&utm_source=americabikes##AmericaBikes##

At a press conference outside the Capitol this morning, where gusty winds nearly carried off the visual aids (if it weren’t for a few diligent supporters), bicycle advocates joined members of Congress to unveil the results of a new survey about federal funding for bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure. The telephone poll of 1,003 Americans, commissioned by the advocacy group America Bikes and conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates, was unequivocal: 83 percent said that federal bike-ped funding should increase, or at the very least be maintained.

“Even we were surprised,” said Andy Clarke, president of the League of American Bicyclists. “From this day forward, we can say with total confidence that this issue has bipartisan support and is in the national interest.”

The poll is timely, coming the day after the first official meeting of the House-Senate conference committee charged with hammering out a compromise transportation bill before policy expires on June 30. The Senate bill includes some protections for bike-ped programs and devolves certain funding decisions to cities and local governments, while early drafts of the House bill eliminated those programs altogether.

Even more notable than the overwhelming support for current funding levels (and “increasing” had the edge over “maintaining,” 47 percent to 36) was the constant level of support across geographic, demographic, economic, and — perhaps most surprisingly — political boundaries. Among self-identified Republicans, 80 percent still favored maintaining or increasing bike-ped funding, compared to 88 percent of Democrats and 86 percent of Independents.

“Every way you cut the numbers, it makes it all the more perverse that a few members of Congress would be opposed to this,” Clarke told Streetsblog.

Mount Bikemore: Reps. Petri and Blumenauer, Sens. Cardin and Durbin. Photo: Ben Goldman

Senators Dick Durbin (D-IL), Ben Cardin (D-MD), and Congressmen Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) and Tom Petri (R-WI) were on hand to tout the survey’s results and defend the importance of bicycle and pedestrian programs.

“Some people fight crime, some people fight terrorism,” said Durbin, enumerating just a few reasons to enter public service. “The Tea Party came to fight bikes.” Durbin, who sits on the transportation bill conference committee, said that even his suburban and rural constituents are incredibly proud of their bicycle infrastructure and want to see continued federal support.

Fellow conferee Blumenauer invoked the “soft-spoken” mayor of Chicago, Rahm Emanuel, as one leader who understands the link between bike-friendliness and the retention of young graduates from colleges and universities. (The Princeton survey found over 90 percent of respondents aged 18-29 support bike-ped.) Chicago, along with New York and Portland, will soon join Washington in embracing bike-share programs, and Blumenauer pointed out that in addition to bicycling’s obvious benefits to health and congestion mitigation, “D.C.’s Capital Bikeshare is the only mass transit system in the United States fully funding its operating costs.” (Well, close enough.)

Clarke praised Petri, the lone Republican lawmaker present, for his “courage and fortitude” in defending bicycle programs against a strong prevailing wind from the right wing of his own party — though Petri questioned whether his actions can truly be called courageous if 83 percent of Americans are with him. Petri previously co-sponsored an amendment to the controversial House bill, H.R. 7, which would protect crucial sources of bike-ped funds such as the Transportation Enhancements and Safe Routes to School programs, but it was voted down in committee despite bipartisan support. Some have speculated that his steadfast defense of bike-ped funding may be the reason he was not nominated to the conference committee by Republican leadership.

“It’s great to have conferees [Durbin and Blumenauer] speaking out in support of this issue,” said Caron Whitaker, campaign director of America Bikes. Whitaker said she hopes the survey results will help convince the conference committee to retain the provisions of the Cardin-Cochran amendment to the Senate bill, which places bike-ped funding decisions directly in the hands of local authorities.

The greater D.C. community was also represented at the event as an example of what local commitment to biking and walking can look like. Angela Fox from the Crystal City Business Improvement District said she is focused on shifting perceptions of her modernist community, sandwiched between the Pentagon and Ronald Reagan Airport and built atop a system of underground tunnels. Under her direction, Crystal City has invested heavily in Capital Bikeshare, which Fox says has helped attract and retain the type of employees local firms prefer. (She has also expanded National Bike to Work Day, scheduled for next Friday, into Bike to Work Week in Crystal City.)

Local parent Sandra Moscoso was also on hand, having come directly from an event commemorating the first ever National Bike to School Day at nearby Lincoln Park. Her organizing campaign within the D.C. Public Schools system succeeded in getting 324 children to ride their bikes to school that morning, a strong showing that Moscoso believes is reason enough to want to see Safe Routes to School funding survive the conference process.

  • That’s a great poll result, but I would have liked to see some deeper questions.

    How about phrasing the question as “take money away from car, bus, and train transportation projects and put it towards walking and bicycle transportation projects?”

    Or “do you support raising taxes to fund walking and cycling infrastructure projects?”

    Since those are the only two ways to raise the federal share of transportation funding that goes towards bike/ped projects, that would give survey respondents a better choice than just a feel good “well of *course* I’m for more walking and bicycling”.  What are people willing to give up for it?

    I think transportation budgets from the local to the federal level are ridiculously unbalanced in favor of cars and highway infrastructure, but to what degree would those 88% of respondents agree with me?

    I suspect that quite a few of them are for pedestrian and bicycling infrastructure…  so long as it doesn’t take away any of their car infrastructure funding or rights-of-way.

    Get back to me when people are in favor of giving up street parking, travel lanes, 30+ mph speed limits, or funding for highway projects to help create bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure.

  • Zack

    Blumenauer was wrong about one thing though, BART here in the Bay Area also pays for itself, if I’m not mistaken.

  • Severin

    YellowRex,

    Questions can be framed any way possible– could have asked ”  Do you support funding safety and public health projects with transportation dollars or congestion causing, unsafe projects?”

    Could have asked “Do you want to create more jobs, or fewer jobs for same number of dollars?” (bike projects create more jobs than regular road projects, per dollar)

  • Guest

    Looks like 13% of the polled population either are in a car or sitting one of those floating chairs featured in Wall-e, never ever touching the ground.  

  • KillMoto

    @YellowRex:disqus Perhaps a better survey question would be “would you pay 20% of your gas tax to reduce potholes, traffic, motorist fatalities and create more parking near to destinations you go to?”  

    Fewer people in cars (who walk, bike, or take the bus) create all of those effects appealing to drivers, but are not possible without simple amenities like sidewalks, bike access to roads and subsidies for bus/rail (unsubsidized public transit has no chance at competing with the highly subsidized single occupancy vehicle model) 

  • Ian Turner

    @0c1805e656ea958343567982046b46e7:disqus : BART is near the top, but it doesn’t pay for itself. Fares cover about 64.5% of its operating costs.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Federal Bike-Ped Funding Sets New High, With Much More Room to Grow

|
Graph: FHWA [PDF] Federal funding for pedestrian and bicycle projects reached a new high last year, according to a report released yesterday by the Federal Highway Administration. In terms of dollars, federal investment in walking and biking more than doubled compared to the previous high, set in 2007, thanks largely to an infusion of $400 […]

Broad Coalition Urges Congress to Support Local Control of Bike-Ped Funds

|
A coalition of 70 organizations, including the US Conference of Mayors, American Heart Association, and the National PTA, have signed on to a letter from America Bikes urging Congress to preserve the Cardin-Cochran amendment — a provision in the Senate transportation bill that allows local agencies to directly access funds street safety projects. The letter is addressed […]

Study: Federal Funding Means More Bike Commuting

|
Bicycling is at a tipping point in many American cities. Bike-share systems are multiplying rapidly, infrastructure that used to be seen as novel is now commonplace, and commuting rates are growing. There are many explanations for this cultural shift, but here’s one not to be ignored: federal funding. Georgetown Public Policy Institute student Marissa Newhall […]