The New Dynamics That Are Eroding the Market for Sprawl

The argument that sprawl is the natural product of market forces and consumer preferences is ringing a little more hollow with each passing day.

While charlatans like Wendell Cox use overly simplistic analyses of Census results to argue that the urban renaissance is a figment of our collective imagination, the underlying trends tell a different story, says Kaid Benfield at the Natural Resources Defense Council’s Switchboard blog.

Behold the dominant development pattern of yesteryear. Kaid Benfield at NRDC's Switchboard says a new set of fundamentals favoring urban living has taken hold. Photo: ##http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/kbenfield/the_collapse_of_the_key_assump.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+switchboard_kbenfield+%28Switchboard%3A+Kaid+Benfield%27s+Blog%29## Switchboard##

Many of the assumptions that underpinned the sprawl bonanza of the last 50 years are just no longer true: The past three years have shredded the logic of building communities as if we have an inexhaustible supply of petroleum, or the notion that homeownership is the most direct path to the American dream.

Benfield argues that demand for sprawling development still exists, but in a diminished capacity that represents a new American dynamic:

The projected growth in housing demand is going to come largely if not entirely from young people who are much more comfortable with urban lifestyles than their parents, and from retiring baby boomers who no longer have large families living at home that need large amounts of house and yard space. Both groups value easy, walkable access to amenities at least as much as, if not more than, the benefits of a subdivision lifestyle based on driving significant distances and caring for lawns. We will still have continuing demand for large-lot suburbia, but the portion of the housing market that will seek it will be much smaller than it once was. In the 1960s families with kids comprised half or more of American households; that portion is down to a third and projected to shrink further to only a quarter.

As for the argument that population figures don’t support the renewed interest in urban places, Benfield says:

These aggregate numbers mask some very important facts, including that, in between, say, 1960 and 2000, many central cities were in severe decline, due to “white flight” and all sorts of perceived urban problems. But for some tragic exceptions like Detroit, that decline now has either slowed dramatically or reversed. In DC, for example, the central city is growing again after 50 years of decline and ironically, a new concern of some is that “white flight” is now to the city, not away from it. New York, Philadelphia, Indianapolis, Houston, Austin and San Antonio also grew. This is where the change is.

Benfield goes on to note that the better indicator of the popularity of cities verses suburbs may be home prices, rather than population growth, and that shows much more robust demand for urban places. The real question isn’t what was the trend over the last decade, but what dynamic will dominate in the future. From that perspective, the current trends are a clear departure from our picket-fences-into-oblivion past.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Walkable Dallas-Fort Worth asks whether it’s time for Texas to get serious about urban freeway demolitions. Urban Ardonia disputes the notion that driving a car is the “grownup” thing to do. And California Streets argues in support of a new law that would allow residents of South Pasadena to oppose the 710 freeway expansion.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Make Smart Growth Affordable by Building More of It

|
Today on the Streetsblog Network, we’re looking at a post from Kaid Benfield on NRDC Switchboard about smart growth and how to make it more affordable. The answer, in a nutshell, is to build more of it — and the market tells us the demand is there. Benfield writes about a recent paper by Todd […]

Suburban Office Parks Are Losing Their Beige-Tinted Shimmer

|
Tacky. Depressing. Soul numbing. There are many ways to describe suburban office parks, those low-lying corporate campuses that populate highway-adjacent fields on the outskirts of American cities. Here’s a new descriptor to add to the list: unpopular. Who wouldn't want to work here? A lot of talented people, turns out. Photo: NRDC Switchboard Businesses are […]

Study Links Quality Urbanism to Happiness :)

|
Finally, a scientific explanation for the feeling of depression I get from suburban environments dominated by Applebee’s, OfficeMax and eight-lane thoroughfares. According to a new study published in Urban Affairs Review, urban design can have a measurable effect on how people feel. Researchers at the University of West Virginia and the University of South Carolina […]

Apple to Build Sprawl-Tastic Corporate Headquarters in Suburbs

|
Remember when Apple was the scrappy upstart? The cool alternative? All the sudden they have more money than the U.S. Treasury and they’re the ones environmentalists are complaining about. If there was ever proof that Apple is cashing in its counter-cultural bona fides, it’s this rendering of the company’s new headquarters. So much for the […]

DC: Getting Urban Sports Arena Development Right

|
Publicly backed sports arenas are always a gamble. Sold as a way to attract investment and energy, they can become big public liabilities, draining money for more essential services. But that doesn’t stop too many cities, and there are examples of places that have gambled on sports facilities and won big. There’s a new member […]