States Begin to Consider the Benefits of a Two-Year Transportation Bill

As we reported yesterday, the buzz around a two year transportation bill seems to be growing, and there are sound reasons to set our sights on a shorter-term bill, despite the obvious pitfalls.

RIDOT Director Michael Lewis. Photo courtesy of ##http://www.dot.state.ri.us/Question3/Question3.asp##RIDOT##

Pro:

  • Preserve higher yearly funding levels
  • Start fresh on a longer-term bill in 2013 under a new administration or Obama’s second term, either of which might be more open to talking about raising new revenue
  • The economy will likely have further rebounded by 2013, making a gas tax hike less politically dangerous to support

Con:

  • John Mica will beat the crap out of you
  • Less ability to plan long-term
  • Deficit-hawk Republicans unwilling to adequately invest in infrastructure may control both houses of Congress in 2013

I spoke this morning to Michael Lewis, the Director of the Rhode Island DOT. He said he sees both sides. He said obviously, a longer-term bill would be ideal, because it allows states to plan larger projects and manage their finances.

All states have been struggling in recent years because of this continuing resolution. We haven’t been able to plan longer, multi-year projects because we really don’t know how much money we’re getting. That being said, a longer-term bill with less money to the states is a real problem for the states. It’s a real problem for the country. Congress has a real dilemma. If they’re not going to increase the revenues into the Highway Trust Fund, maybe we’re better off at a shorter-term bill that has level funding as opposed to locking in a long-term bill with lower funding.

Brian Searles, secretary of the Vermont DOT, had a similar message. A six-year bill is far better, he told me, and he’s still hoping that President Obama’s vision for a robust investment package will set the tone for the conversation. But if that doesn’t happen? “Oh sure,” he said, “if it was a much smaller bill than what president Obama has talked about up to this point then clearly we’d want a bill that was shorter in duration.”

States have had a unified message to Congress: we want a long-term bill. And until now, that’s generally been understood to mean a six-year bill. AASHTO is on record as supporting a “multi-year” bill, but it won’t specify how many years is “multi.”

But there is growing buzz about the two-year option. Lewis, who chairs the AASHTO subcommittee on construction, and Searles both say it will be a topic of much discussion at AASHTO’s spring meetings.

Lewis said Rhode Island gets $220 million a year from the Highway Trust Fund for highway and bridge construction, which they currently match with borrowed money. A 20 percent reduction in the total bill could mean their annual take is $176 million – this for a state that already suffers from underinvestment, according to a blue ribbon panel’s 2008 report that found that in order to maintain a state of good repair, the state would need to spend about $640 million a year.

With the reality of a smaller bill sinking in, it makes sense that stakeholders – who almost unanimously told House and Senate panels that they need a far higher level of investment and increased revenues – would look to a two-year bill that doesn’t cut quite as deep.

There is another hazard to coming out in support of a two-year bill, however. Perhaps Mica was kidding when he threatened to “beat the crap” out of anyone proposing a shorter-term bill, but either way, he’s not a man whose bad side anyone wants to get on right now. The first and most important thing that needs to happen to get any transportation bill passed is to get it through the House. If he’s adamantly in favor of a six-year bill, no one serious about getting a bill passed wants to cross him by talking about a two-year bill.

Once a bill gets through the House, however, the Senate can go its own way, hoping to work out the “details” in conference. But does Sen. Baucus have EPW Committee Chair Barbara Boxer’s ear on this whole two-year business? Last I heard, she’s still talking six.

  • Ron Butcher

    Anyone who knows a lick about DOT planning and engineering with guts will state a 2-year bad is really, really bad. Mica knows what he is talking about, so let the man do his thing and get a bill on the floor in the next few weeks.

  • 晓荔 陈

    bCXL-???????????? ?????? ??? ???????????????????????????????????1???? ?????? ??? ?????????????????????????????? ?? 2013?????????????????????????? ?? ?????? ?? ????????????????????????????????

    If not so anxious that most people would choose foreign purchasing Louis Vuitton Bags.Put aside the different countries and regions of different shopping preferences,Louis Vuitton UK buy Cheap Louis Vuitton hand-selected to not much difference,coupled with the big emphasis on the Chinese market,a lot of style is already the world simultaneous release,so the price is only one factor argumentative.Yes ah,regardless of money or not,who would not want to save money too?Especially the hundreds of thousands,to the less louis vuitton outlet there are thousands of big luxury.

    louis vuitton outlet 2013 spring quarter Men bags series,fluorescent colors,traditional innovation,louis vuitton sale bags for men inject new vitality.Since the designer Kim Jones added to the luxury brand cheap louis vuitton later,such as louis vuitton outlet online the French veteran hit booster as being a brand new look,young fashion taste can be described as more and more intense.

    Cheap Louis Vuitton luggage advanced customization services,Louis Vuitton Handbags section where a custom color Haute,is a senior in Louis Vuitton UK means,and the most common in the fashion circle is Haute couture-haute couture.By the designer and fashion boutiques in Paris,louis vuitton outlet must be members of the Association accreditation,an association recognized by the designers just enjoy “haute couture designer” of the title,its haute couture fashion works in order to use the title,and is protected by law.

    louis vuitton sale 2013 summer series handbags extraordinarily colorful and romantic extraordinary in louis vuitton outlet store,sweet peach pink,temperament dark blue as the main colors,combined with artistic temperament canvas texture printing,filling the art.In addition to flowers outside printing,more classic louis vuitton outlet Logo embossed Logo embossed or similar color as a decoration,cheap louis vuitton filling the big luxury noble gas.

    ???????? 2013???????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????4??????????? ???????????? ????? ????????? ?????????????????

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

What Washington Can Do For — And Alongside — Metro Area Planners

|
At one point midway through yesterday’s Brookings Institution forum on metropolitan planning, moderator Chris Leinberger quipped that Portland was deliberately not represented. It’s not that Portland isn’t a model of sustainability, he explained, but that "we all have Portland fatigue" — that urban policy thinkers are eager to expand the models of local development beyond […]

House Jobs Bill Answers Some Key Transportation Questions

|
The House jobs bill, expected to pass later today before the chamber adjourns for the holidays, includes a $75 billion infrastructure section that gives $27.5 billion to roads and $8.4 billion to transit, largely mirroring this year’s first economic stimulus law. The header of today’s House jobs bill: No one ever said they’re easy reads! […]

Is the FAST Act Good for Bike Funding?

|
When Congress passed a long-term transportation bill for the first time in more than a decade earlier this month, People for Bikes called it “a great day for bikes,” and Momentum Magazine called it a “win for bikes.” But is it? The bill reserves $820 million for biking and walking infrastructure annually in its first two years, […]

House GOP Regroups While Senate Dems Tackle Amendments

|
Last week’s big news — that the House transportation bill faces a likely overhaul by its Republican authors — rippled through Washington faster than you can say, “gas tax increases are off the table.” Very little is known yet about the revised House bill, except that it will probably restore dedicated funding for mass transit, […]