President Obama to Embrace Deficit Commission Plan Tomorrow

Four months ago – just days after the Democrats’ “shellacking” at the polls – a bipartisan commission offered President Obama the chance to retake the budgetary high ground from Republicans, who had positioned themselves as the party of fiscal sanity. The blue-ribbon deficit commission – led by Erskine Bowles, President Bill Clinton’s budget negotiator, and former Republican Senator Alan Simpson – detailed its agenda for getting federal revenues and spending into balance, capping both at 21 percent of GDP over the next 25 years [PDF]. Transportation advocates were gratified to see a strong recommendation for a 15-cent increase in the gas tax to stabilize the Highway Trust Fund.

President Obama and Vice President Joe Biden with deficit commission co-chairs Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson. Photo: ##http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2010/0218/Can-Obama-s-deficit-commission-work-as-partisanship-rages##Jason Reed / Reuters##

It was Obama’s opportunity to get out in front of the deficit issue, beating the GOP at its own game and potentially taking ideology out of deficit reduction by heeding the calls of a bipartisan group of esteemed experts.

Instead, the president let more than four months roll by while Republicans fought doggedly for budget cuts. Democrats, meanwhile, tried to balance spending cuts with keeping vital programs alive. All the while, the debate over the 2011 budget focused only on how much to cut from discretionary programs, a relatively small slice of the overall budget. (Discretionary spending like the federal transportation program is dwarfed by spending on the military, Social Security, and Medicare.) It made for a piecemeal and haphazard approach, and took some big bites out of infrastructure investment.

In Obama’s speech at George Washington University, he’s expected to throw his weight – finally – behind the deficit commission’s plan. A week after Rep. Paul Ryan, chair of the House Budget Committee, introduced his drastic plan to cut the deficit, it’s as good a time as any for the president to champion a bipartisan approach to balancing the federal budget.

For transportation advocates, this means two things. First, the deficit commission recommendations would put an end to panic-induced budget cuts of the sort we’ve seen this week, hacking at vital infrastructure programs. The commission’s plan didn’t just look at discretionary spending, it also examined military spending, entitlements, and how to actually raise revenue. Under this approach, transportation investment doesn’t have such a fat target on its back.

Second, the deficit commission had a clear recommendation for stabilizing the Highway Trust Fund (in order to eliminate the need for emergency bailouts from the general fund): raise the gas tax. It recognized that requiring spending to be equivalent to the previous year’s revenue is a recipe for disaster if revenues are as low as they are now. In fact, the commission allows for general fund bailouts until a 15-cent gas tax is fully phased in (as opposed to the House Republicans’ plan to starve infrastructure by holding spending to current revenues). After that, it limits spending to revenue levels. But with the gas tax almost doubled, even President Obama’s expansive program for infrastructure investment suddenly becomes possible.

Also, the commission would shift transportation spending into the “mandatory” column, rather than discretionary, which Obama also favors.

Meanwhile, other commission recommendations would reduce waste by eliminating earmarks, encouraging agencies to identify opportunities for savings, consolidating duplicative programs, and reducing the amount government spends on itself.

Of course, the big-ticket items in the report deal with entitlement reform and changes to the tax code. We at Streetsblog won’t endorse or comment on those parts of the commission report or Obama’s proposal – they’re way above our pay grade. But if the president finally gets behind an adequate funding mechanism for infrastructure investment – we can get behind that.

  • Anonymous

    Is anybody truly surprised? Obama handpicked the deficit commission members. All of this has been in the works for sometime now. The political parties have been in total cooperation with cuts to “entitlements”. They are not so much foes as they are coconspirators. Definition of the dirty word “entitlements”.– Any program paid for with American taxpayer dollars for services for and a direct benefit to same taxpayers and not used for earmarks ,pork, or fraud. NO WONDER OUR REPRESENTATIVES THINKIT IS A DIRTY WORD!!

  • Anonymous

    Is anybody truly surprised? Obama handpicked the deficit commission members. All of this has been in the works for sometime now. The political parties have been in total cooperation with cuts to “entitlements”. They are not so much foes as they are coconspirators. Definition of the dirty word “entitlements”.– Any program paid for with American taxpayer dollars for services for and a direct benefit to same taxpayers and not used for earmarks ,pork, or fraud. NO WONDER OUR REPRESENTATIVES THINKIT IS A DIRTY WORD!!

  • Anonymous

    PERSPECTIVE ON SOCIAL SECURITY: The social security program is a compulsory savings program of OUR money for OUR retirement totally from OUR paychecks. Instead of keeping these funds safeguarded, collection interest our representatives put it all into the general fund and spent all of OUR money. In other words, they stole it! Now that there is more money going out to our retirees and less money coming in because of the economy (fewer paychecks, therefore less ss payrole taxes) this ponzi scheme is starting to collapse fasrer thana Madoff scam and that is why politicians want to slash (reform) ss because now they will have to find those funds elsewhere and pay interest onthat debt. GET IT!?

  • Anonymous

    congress passed the extension to the ruinous Bush tax cuts and not one of them threatened a “govrnment shutdown” when they passed it. Republicans are very anxious to make these cuts permanent. Do not be tricked. Congress is only interested in having us make “sacrifices”!
    Break out the large economy size vasoline, we will need it!

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Our Stagnant Gas Tax Rate Is Making the Deficit Worse

|
Despite the anti-tax rhetoric of this round of elections, there’s been a little flurry of support for raising the gas tax lately. Two senators just proposed bumping it by 25 cents to replenish the highway trust fund. And the co-chairs of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform included a gas tax hike in its […]

House Dems Release Alternative to GOP Budget, Separate From Obama

|
With the FY2011 budget finally settled, it’s time for Washington to start fighting over 2012. President Obama released his 2012 budget proposal in February. The Republicans introduced theirs last week. And the House Democrats have just released theirs [PDF]. Meanwhile, President Obama is giving a speech in just a few hours on his plan to […]

GOP Budget Would Slash Transpo Spending, Entrench Oil Dependence

|
With the release of House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan’s budget proposal yesterday, right wing calls for massive cuts to transportation spending are now enshrined in the GOP leadership’s fiscal plan. Ryan singled out transportation as an area particularly ripe for cuts, criticized the use of gas tax revenues for projects that aren’t highways, and […]

Deficit Commission Pushes For Anti-Sprawl Reforms

|
If political pandering and bad economic policies have encouraged sprawl and an autocentric transportation system, better incentives can start to correct past mistakes. Here’s one place to start: the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform report, released this Wednesday. The report has plenty to make anyone squirm. As co-chair Alan Simpson said when he […]

The Upside of GOP ‘Hypocrisy’ on Transportation Stimulus Grants

|
To call Rep. Pete Sessions (TX), chairman of the House Republican campaign committee, a critic of the Obama administration’s stimulus law would be putting it mildly. Sessions marked the one-year anniversary of the law’s passage last week by labeling the stimulus a "massive spending binge" that only "allegedly" created jobs in his district. Is his […]