LaHood on Transport: ‘We Don’t Want to Pit One Mode … Against Another’

While Vice President Biden was giving a candid take on cities’ difficulties taking advantage of the economic stimulus, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood was giving a recovery speech of his own in Chicago — where he sent a message of transport reform to an audience that might not have expected it.

3484016419_52ea97c5f0.jpgTransportation Secretary LaHood, with his boss. (Photo: whitehouse via Flickr)

The bulk of LaHood’s speech focused on the federal effort to jump-start the economy, but he closed with a mission statement of sorts for future policymaking at the U.S. DOT.

LaHood mentioned the importance of setting national targets for the transport system, which has been a central goal of reformers but is absent from the current House version of the long-term infrastructure bill.

He also discussed the need for regional planning that better serves the needs of metro areas instead of top-down transportation decision-making in state capitals.

One aspect of LaHood’s message in particular, however, was applicable to everyday drivers and cyclists as well as the Washington lobbying machine. "[W]e don’t want to pit one mode of transportation against another," he said.

The relevant portion of his remarks is available in full after the jump. Could it signal the beginning of a more even-handed federal approach to urban transportation needs?

Looking ahead, beyond the [stimulus], I believe it’s time to re-think our federal spending priorities and focus on transportation investments that more effectively meet the needs of our communities.

For many years, federal transportation spending has mainly been driven by rigid formulas and divided by modes of transportation — with separate funding for each type of need, from highways to subways to ferries. We need to turn this around, so that our priorities and the outcomes people care about — such as building transit and affordable housing closer together — drive our investments.

In order for this to happen, we have to change the way we operate. We need to make our national priorities clear — and then empower state and local jurisdictions and other stakeholders to make them a reality. And we don’t want to pit one mode of transportation against another.

Instead, we’re asking communities to put outcomes first — and then determine the type of transportation infrastructure that works best to meet those outcomes. We’re hoping and expecting that this will be an effective way to strike a new balance among all forms of transportation.

We also want to allow counties and cities to work together to develop regional plans reflecting both regional and national priorities. Then we’d fund them directly. The fact is, metro areas hold over 80 percent of the U.S. population. They’re major centers of economic activity. And they account for most of the congestion and greenhouse gas emissions.

Empowering metro regions to tackle their transportation and energy problems will move us closer to enjoying cities and suburbs that are cleaner, less congested, and less polluted than many are today. We think all this can be accomplished without sacrificing the important investments that also need to be made in rural towns.

What’s really important isn’t the size of a project or a jurisdiction. It’s whether we can succeed in investing in transportation projects that enhance our quality of life and help us compete economically.

  • When you look at his remarks below, it’s shocking to realize that the current program actually is set up to make it difficult or impossible to address the needs of the vast majority of the population:

    The fact is, metro areas hold over 80 percent of the U.S. population. They’re major centers of economic activity. And they account for most of the congestion and greenhouse gas emissions.

    Empowering metro regions to tackle their transportation and energy problems will move us closer to enjoying cities and suburbs that are cleaner, less congested, and less polluted than many are today.

  • Clutch J

    YES, that is the key strategy for the federal transportation bill: Shift resources and authority away from state DOTs to regions.

    In the process, let’s not forget that even regionalism has its limits, and let’s see if we also can’t also make the federal bill work better at the community level (with complete streets, increased emphasis on operations, goal-setting related to health, etc).

    >David G.– “Empowering metro regions to tackle their transportation and energy problems…”

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Same.gov: A Transportation Secretary Who’s Hard to Believe In

|
On Monday, Obama announced his "green dream team." Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood wasn’t there. We’ve been calling around to Congressional staffers, advocates and insiders to get a better sense of what Obama’s appointment of Ray LaHood as transportation secretary means for those pushing for sustainable transport, smart growth, livable streets. While no one is giving […]

LaHood Praises NYC But Shrugs at Transport Reform to Empower Cities

|
Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood praised the New York City area’s clean-transportation strategy today in a speech to the region’s metropolitan planning organization (MPO), promising a stronger focus on urban priorities even as he all but ruled out two reforms long sought by the nation’s cities. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood (Photo: Zimbio) LaHood’s speech to the […]

LaHood Asks For 18-Month Extension of Four-Year-Old Transpo Law

|
Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood is asking Congress to extend the existing federal transportation law for 18 months, averting the coming insolvency of the nation’s highway trust fund while putting off broad-based transport reform for as long as the Bush administration did in the days surrounding the 2004 election. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood (Photo: AP) LaHood’s […]

LaHood Reaches Out to Transit Industry, Lamenting ‘Lousy Economy’

|
Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood sought to commiserate with the cash-strapped transit industry today, declaring the Obama administration an ally of local rail and bus agencies even as the "lousy economy" clouds prospects for passage of a new long-term federal transportation bill. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood (Photo: Getty Images) In an address to the American Public […]

Ray LaHood Won’t Stay at USDOT Past 2012

|
Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood told the LA Times today that he’s a one-term secretary. Don’t expect him to serve during President Obama’s second term, if there is one, or to run for any other public office in the future. Todd Zwillich of Transportation Nation suggests that partisan gridlock may be to blame. “A lot has changed in […]

How Will the Next Transpo Secretary Build on Ray LaHood’s Legacy?

|
He strung it out long enough, but Ray LaHood has finally announced that he’s resigning as Transportation Secretary. Speculation has been rampant for months about who could replace him, and now it kicks into high gear. Matt Yglesias captured the sentiments of many transportation advocates when he tweeted yesterday, “Ray LaHood was a surprisingly good DOT […]