Study: Sprawling Areas Require 3 Times as Much Pavement Per Person

How much pavement area is required to service the population of an area is pretty closely related to population density, a Smart Growth America study found.
How much pavement area is required to service the population of an area is pretty closely related to population density, a Smart Growth America study found.

One of the big downsides to sprawl is the public cost of maintaining infrastructure that is extended over wide areas. A new study of New Jersey by Smart Growth America and New Jersey Future [PDF] attempts to quantify this relationship by looking at the amount of space devoted to roads in communities of varying densities.

Turns out there’s a very strong correlation: The most sprawling parts of the Garden State require more than three times the road space per resident and employee than the most urban areas.

The study divided New Jersey into 100-acre “cells” of a uniform size, then compared the number of people that live and work in each cell — “activity density” — to the ratio of land devoted to roads.

In the state’s most densely populated areas, with about 50 people per acre — places like Hoboken and Jersey City — about 130 square feet of pavement was allocated for each employee and resident. However, in some of the more sprawling areas — places with five residents per acre — the amount of pavement per person was more than three times higher: 423 square feet.

The two groups stress that the relationship was not linear. As municipalities became increasingly urban, the efficiency benefits from increasing density became less and less dramatic. The biggest efficiency gains were found when comparing sprawling areas to other sprawling areas that were slightly more dense, the study found.

The group found that in the least dense areas — municipalities with under two-and-a-half people per acre — almost 1,700 square feet of road space was required per person. But in the next most sprawling category, with between two-and-a-half and five people per acre, about half as much was required: 792 square feet.

The upshot is that reducing the share of the state devoted to very, very low density development could result in some big savings. NJF’s Tim Evans estimates that if all of New Jersey’s developed areas had an “activity density” of 10 people per acre or higher, total municipal road space could be reduced 36 percent, saving an estimated $470 million a year in maintenance costs. It’s worth noting that that’s not even a very dense arrangement — about the equivalent of single-family homes on quarter-acre lots.

The findings also have potential equity implications. The results suggest that relatively wealthy homeowners living on large lots might be having their outsized infrastructure needs subsidized by poorer people living in urban areas, report authors say. Although the group says further study of road funding mechanisms is needed.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

500 Square Miles Lost to New Jersey Sprawl Over 20 Years

|
New development in New Jersey’s Warren County. Image: John Hasse via Planners Web. The last decade has often been heralded as a "back to the cities" moment, a time when Americans have been excited to return to the walkable lifestyle many abandoned two generations before. A new report from New Jersey’s Rutgers and Rowan Universities […]

New Jersey’s Urban Centers Are Bouncing Back

|
New Jersey’s cities — even downtrodden and smaller ones — are seeing a dramatic shift in population trends, according to research from smart growth group New Jersey Future. The state’s eight largest urban areas — Newark, Jersey City, Trenton, Paterson, Elizabeth, Camden, New Brunswick, Atlantic City — accounted for 11.4 percent of the state’s population growth […]

Is Jersey City a Suburb? Joel Kotkin Thinks So

|
Now that the 2010 Census results are filtering in, get ready for a variety of hasty, dubious interpretations. Sprawl apologist Joel Kotkin wasted no time deciding that the trends show not an urban renaissance, but continued preference for suburbia. According to an analysis Kotkin published in Forbes, suburbs accounted for an astounding 80 to 100 […]

Study: Annual Cost of Sprawl in America Adds Up to $4,500 Per Person

|
A new study confirms what we already know too well: Sprawl is expensive. The New Climate Economy’s latest report [PDF] attempts to put a figure on it and it’s pretty staggering: more than $1 trillion a year nationwide. That figure accounts for higher costs to individuals and communities associated with sprawling development patterns, including transportation infrastructure, less […]

The Link Between Northeast Ohio's Flooding and Its Sprawl

|
After a string of major flooding events, residents of Northeast Ohio are looking for someone to blame, reports Tim Kovach. Are local governments at fault for the property damage from these floods? Or should residents, as a great poet once said, blame it on the rain? Neither question really gets to the heart of the […]

New Jersey Squanders Transit By Surrounding Stations With Sprawl

|
New Jersey is the most population-dense state in the country, and many residents get to work via one of its several transit systems. But too many of New Jersey’s transit stations are surrounded by single-family housing, severely limiting the number of people — especially low-income people — with convenient, walkable access to transit. Some entire transit lines […]