Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Bicycling

Is Congress Trying to Put the Kibosh on TIGER Funding For Bike/Ped?

Philadelphia's bike/ped network was one of four recipients of exclusively bike/ped TIGER grants. (And no, four is not too many.) Photo: ##http://www.tooledesign.com/philadelphia/pdf/Philadelphia_PandB_Plan_Final.pdf##Phila. Ped and Bicycle Plan##

Did TIGER spend too much money on bicycle and pedestrian programs? That's the question Larry Ehl at Transportation Issues Daily is asking. After all, Congress appears to be encouraging USDOT to spend TIGER grant money on something -- anything -- other than bike/ped.

It's right there in the 2012 transportation appropriation bill, which President Obama signed into law November 18. The TIGER section includes this mandate: “The conferees direct the Secretary to focus on road, transit, rail and port projects.” It doesn't specifically say anything about bicycles and pedestrians, but reading between the lines, it's easy to see what they mean. And as Ehl says, it's a warning for USDOT to "tread lightly, or risk giving TIGER opponents more reasons to eliminate future funding for the program."

Ehl suggests we "look at the actual numbers" and decide for ourselves:

  • TIGER I (Recovery Act) allocated $43,500,000 to two exclusively bike-ped projects.  That was about 3% of the $1,498,000,000 awarded and 4% of the 51 projects.
  • TIGER II allocated $25,200,000 to two exclusively bike-ped projects.  That was 4.5% out of the $556,500,000 awarded to capital projects and about 5% of the 42 projects. (TIGER II also awarded $27,500,000 for 33 planning grants.)
In addition to the four bike/ped projects TIGER supported, Ehl notes, there were "quite a few highway, transit and rail projects that included a bike-ped component, such as adding sidewalks." He lists them all in his post.
Still, that's 4.5 percent of all TIGER funds that went to exclusively bike/ped projects in the first two rounds. Considering that trips by foot and by bike make up about 12 percent of all trips, a 4.5 percent share of funding doesn't seem like too much. In fact, it seems like it's just barely beginning to balance out a transportation system that's been far too skewed toward road projects for far too long.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Monday’s Headlines Slow Down

Cities have proven measures they can put into place to slow down speeding drivers and save lives.

February 16, 2026

The New Uber-Backed Car Insurance ‘Reform’ Push Is Actually A War On Crash Victims

New York State Gov. Kathy Hochul wants to limit payouts to crash victims under the guise of "affordability" and bogus claims about "staged crashes."

February 13, 2026

Friday’s Headlines Are Full of Hot Air

They done done it, as we say in the South: The Trump administration's official policy now is that climate change poses no threat to human health.

February 13, 2026

Talking Headways Podcast: Concrete Doesn’t Spend Money, People Do

Dr. Lawrence Frank shows how the decisions we make about the built environment are a symbol of why the world is so f'd up. A very special edition of Talking Headways.

February 12, 2026

Why Does Trump Wants To Punish Cities For Free Buses?

Hint: it's probably not to make anyone's transportation network better!

February 12, 2026
See all posts