Transit Vote 2016: California’s Transportation Funding Ballot Initiatives

xxx
Los Angeles County’s Measure M would add 100 miles of rail and 65 miles of BRT. Maps by Adam Linder

We continue our overview of what’s at stake in the big transit ballot initiatives next week with a look at California. Previous installments in this series examined  Indianapolis, Seattle, Detroit, Atlanta, and Raleigh. All three of Streetsblog’s west coast editors contributed to this article: Melanie Curry of Streetsblog CA, Roger Rudick of Streetsblog SF, and Joe Linton of Streetsblog LA.

Twenty of 58 California counties already have transportation sales taxes in place. These taxes fund transportation infrastructure at a rate nearly twice that of the state gas tax. According to State Assembly Transportation Committee chair Jim Frazier, counties raise $4 billion annually from transportation sales taxes, while the state gas tax contributes $2.3 billion in annual revenue for transportation.

California counties plan years ahead to put measures on the ballot during high-turnout presidential elections, as tax measures require a two-thirds super-majority to pass. There are 15 county transportation sales tax measures before California voters next week. Voters will also weigh in on transportation bond measures (Oakland and BART) and a property tax measure (Oakland-based AC Transit) for maintenance and operations.

Los Angeles County’s Measure M

L.A. County Metro, which already has three prior sales taxes under its belt, is trying for an ambitious fourth. Measure M would extend a sunsetting tax and augment it with an additional half-cent sales tax. If passed, Measure M would raise an estimated $860 million annually. Metro initially studied a 40- or 50-year tax, then decided on an indefinite no-sunset plan. In its first 40 years, Measure M is projected to bring in $120 billion.

Earlier sales taxes spurred the construction of Metro’s 100-mile rail system. Over the next 50 years, Measure M would add another 100 miles of Metro rail and 65 miles of Bus Rapid Transit. Transit construction gets the largest percentage of the Measure M expenditure plan, at 35 percent. Additional transit expenditures include 20 percent for bus operations, 5 percent for rail operations, and 2 percent for state of good repair.

In order to entice drivers to approve Measure M, 17 percent of expenditures would go to highway projects, mostly to widen numerous freeways. An additional 16 percent “Local Return” goes to local municipalities and is mostly spent on cities’ car-centric priorities.

For the first time, Metro has included dedicated funding for walking and biking facilities, with a 2 percent set-aside for active transportation projects and programs. Significant additional bike/ped monies are also embedded in first/last mile connections to rail, and even complete streets projects within Measure M’s highway category. Overall, walk and bike projects will receive 6 to 8 percent of the total. This funding has brought nonprofits including the L.A. County Bicycle Coalition and L.A. Walks to campaign in favor of the proposed tax.

San Francisco Bay Area’s Measure RR

In stark contrast to L.A.’s emphasis on shiny new rail and highway projects, the three-county BART District (San Francisco, Alameda, and Contra Costa) is taking a decidedly fix-it-first approach.

BART’s Measure RR is a $3.5 billion bond measure to update, repair, and replace BART’s aging infrastructure. Measure RR would make existing BART service safer and more reliable. It also would increase capacity by enabling BART to run trains faster and closer together, accommodating nearly 200,000 additional daily riders.

Many More Transportation Propositions Throughout California

California’s transportation propositions vary in emphasis, but mostly locals are trying to fill shortfalls created by dwindling state gas tax revenue. Most of the state’s measures prioritize highway expansion, though there are exceptions like Contra Costa’s “Sustainable Communities” plan. Many include modest support for transit and active transportation, but none envision a major departure from the car-centric status quo.

  • Contra Costa’s Measure X allocates 27 percent to transit, and includes 22 percent for “sustainable communities” including complete streets, bikeways, and community development.
  • Sacramento’s Measure B has a strong early “fix-it-first” focus that front-loads five years of complete streets redesigns. The fix-it-first requirement also applies to the nine percent of revenue set aside for transit, but not to the nine percent that will go towards highway projects.
  • San Diego’s Measure A has stirred controversy among livability advocates, who charge that it would continue the dangerous car-centric status quo for the next thirty years. The measure would allocate about three percent of its revenue to bicycle and pedestrian projects, 42 percent to transit. Only fourteen percent would go to highway projects, which would be funded in the first years of the measure.
  • San Francisco’s Propositions J and K  work together to address housing affordability and transportation. Prop K raises city sales taxes and J creates a fund for homelessness and transportation. Because K does not specify what the taxes would be spent on, it only needs to pass with a simple majority, unlike the other sales tax initiatives listed here. J specifies that transportation money will go to improve SF’s Muni transit system, as well as to redesign high-injury corridors.
  • Santa Clara’s Measure B includes money for highway expansions, some of which are being called “transit improvements” because they include HOV lanes on freeways. Eight percent of the measure would go to transit and four percent to bicycling and walking.

Rounding out the California initiatives are: Humboldt’s Measure UMerced’s Measure V, Monterey’s Measure XPlacer Measure MSan Luis Obispo’s Measure JSanta Cruz’ Measure DStanislaus’ Measure L, and Ventura’s Measure AA.

  • Richard

    If LA passes M and builds this out, it’s transit system is going to be a beast. 200 miles of rail would nearly be as much as NYC(although far far more spread out).

  • Kevin Wenderoth

    Couldn’t agree more. If they are able to build out a rapid transit system like this, it will be a proper metro system. Still surprises me LA has become more ambitious than the Bay Area when it comes to transit. Pretty rad.

  • People mistake San Francisco as some kind of mecca just because it’s saturated with tech companies and “looks pretty” on a postcard or TV show backdrop. In reality, it’s a super expensive city with crumbling infrastructure and no clear vision.

    LA is going places and learned from its mistakes. SF not only keeps making the same mistakes, but wants to keep itself rooted in 1950, but with 2016 prices.

  • Kevin Wenderoth

    It’s a shame, really. Considering the residential density between SF, Oakland & Berkeley, transit with dedicated rights of way, whether BRT or rail, should be much, much greater.

  • steve_piercy

    Measure D is badly flawed, and supports highway widening and more driving instead of fully funding public transportation, commuter benefits programs, and other solutions to encourage people to get out of their cars.

    https://wideningwontwork.org/

  • Ana Filesmore

    On the contrary, Measure D for Santa Cruz County will fund one of the most environmentally sustainable transportation plans in CA.

    $130 million will be invested in safe bike lanes, bike paths, and pedestrian crossings in various areas throughout the county, such as the HWY 9 corridor, the 32-mile Coastal Rail Trail, and two new bicycle/pedestrian bridges over HWY 1.

    Measure D will also provide funds to Lift Line and Metro Paracruz to help seniors and the disabled get around town.

    Side note: Measure D will help fund the HWY 17 wildlife under crossing for mountain lions and other animals to reduce collisions between vehicles and wildlife.

    The list goes on about how Measure D is not a badly flawed plan but a comprehensive list of what Santa Cruz County needs.

    https://getsantacruzcountymoving.org/

  • steve_piercy

    How is dedicating over $105 million to highway widening environmentally sustainable?

    How does underfunding Metro help people get out of their cars?

    Caltrans own Draft Environmental Impact report concluded that highway widening would not reduce congestion anywhere near where supporters over Measure D would lead one to believe.

    Take a look at who is behind Measure D. Over half the campaign funds came from outside Santa Cruz County. Over half came from construction and labor industries.

    https://wideningwontwork.org/news/who-is-behind-the-yes-on-measure-d-campaign-on-the-santa-cruz-county-november-ballot/

    Measure D is a turd sandwich, with some wilted lettuce and soggy tomato to hide the feces. Sorry, I’m not taking a bite of that. Enjoy yours!

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

6 Transportation Ballot Initiatives to Watch Next Tuesday

|
Next week, voters in Maryland and Wisconsin may tell state officials to keep their greedy paws off transportation funds. Louisianans will consider whether to create an infrastructure bank to help finance projects. Texans will weigh the wisdom of raiding the state’s Rainy Day Fund for — what else? — highways. And Massachusetts activists who have […]

The Silver Lining: 73 Percent of Transpo Ballot Measures Win

|
Ready for some good news? Voters around the country got to decide on 29 transportation-related ballot initiatives yesterday. According to an analysis by the Center for Transportation Excellence, transportation advocates and reformers won 73 percent of them. If you add in other initiatives that passed earlier this year, the victory rate jumps to 77 percent. […]

The Anatomy of a Successful Transit Ballot Measure

|
Last week, people went to the polls in four states to vote on transit-related ballot initiatives. Of 10 measures transit advocates were watching closely, seven of them were victories. Last night, I had the opportunity to hear from Jason Jordan of the Center for Transportation Excellence about what makes a successful transit ballot campaign. Here […]

Local Ballot Results: The Good, the Bad, and the Highway Money Grabs

|
While last night’s election is looking like decisively bad news for transit in the Senate and in several statehouses, the results from local ballot initiatives are a little brighter. Here are the highlights that have Streetsblog Network members buzzing, as well as results from other referendums around the country. Seattle Seattle voters approved a ballot […]

Mixed Bag for Closely-Watched Local Transit Races

|
Last night delivered some good results — and some disappointment — for transit-related ballot initiatives around the country. The biggest disappointments came from Los Angeles, Memphis, and Houston. A measure to continue the half-cent sales tax for transit in Los Angeles County until 2069 was narrowly defeated, falling less than two percent short of the […]