Mica Warns Boxer on Highway Trust Fund; House Plans Hearing on “Drill Bill”

“I want to congratulate you on your Committee’s approval of the ‘Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act,” begins House Transportation Committee Chair John Mica’s letter yesterday to Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA), chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee.

Rep. John Mica says Boxer's bill will bankrupt the Highway Trust Fund. Photo: ##http://www.zimbio.com/photos/John+Mica/House+Oversight+Government+Reform+Committee/vK0FWtFBZ0V##Alex Wong/Getty Images##

From there, the letter changes tone:

However, I am concerned that the Senate two-year proposal does not address the fundamental problem of the long-term insolvency of our Highway Trust Fund. Your proposal will essentially bankrupt the Highway Trust Fund and make it impossible to provide any funding for fiscal year 2014.

The letter continues the debate between Mica and Boxer over how to supplement revenue from the national gas tax to fund transportation spending. It’s Mica’s response to a letter he received from Boxer three weeks ago, in which she questioned whether or not his plan truly maintained current funding levels.

Mica agrees with Boxer that current funding levels should be maintained (though her bill calls for current spending plus inflation, which Mica hasn’t bought into yet). But he has a problem with the fact that the Senate hasn’t identified the new sources of revenue necessary to do that. (He says he’s working on that himself.)

Mica attached a CBO report showing Highway Trust Fund deficits beginning in 2014 under Boxer’s scenario. Boxer has said that with the additional $12 billion from some other, yet-unidentified source, her bill will keep the HTF afloat. Current levels of spending, funded only with Trust Fund receipts, would start creating deficits even sooner – the Highway Account would run into red ink this fiscal year and the Transit Account in the next fiscal year.

Of course, it stands to reason that the Senate proposal doesn’t address 2014, since it’s a two-year bill. Further, the CBO merely ran the numbers based on assumptions that Mica made, which are not universally agreed upon. For example, the fact that all contract authority and obligations limitations are zeroed out for 2014 and then come back for the following year. That’s not a product of the money running out — it’s just the scenario Mica laid out.

In addition, Democrats note that Mica hasn’t found a funding stream for his six-year proposal either. A bipartisan group in the Senate has at least figured out a way to keep things going for two years, with a commitment to keep working on the long-term solvency issue.

So what’s Mica’s solution to the funding predicament? He hasn’t publicly embraced the stated GOP path toward transportation solvency — capturing revenue from fossil fuel extraction — but neither has he spoken out against the idea of expanding oil drilling to fund infrastructure.

That plan is about to move forward another step in the House. When House Speaker John Boehner said the House would vote soon on a bill to expanding energy production, Streetsblog wondered if he was referring to one of the bills that have already been introduced, and we couldn’t get the answer out of anyone.

Then, lo, Rep. Steve Stivers (R-OH) announced he was introducing a third drilling-for-infrastructure bill: the American-Made Energy and Infrastructure Jobs Act. Stivers links concerns about “rising energy costs, high unemployment and our aging infrastructure” and proposes solving them by opening up “untapped oil resources in the Outer Continental Shelf that will raise revenue from new off-shore drilling leases and provide a new dedicated source of revenue to fund infrastructure projects.” For more detail, check out the bill language here [PDF].

The House Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources is holding a hearing on that bill Friday morning, followed that afternoon with a hearing on the virtues of drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (though not necessarily for infrastructure – that’s just for the fun of it).

  • If you don’t know what a trust fund is, this article explains it very well.

    http://explainlikeakid.blogspot.com/2011/10/what-is-trust-fund.html

  • My god!  Raise the god damned Federal gas tax a penny a year and your problems would be solved!  Who the hell would even notice such a slow incremental increase?!?!  Investments in our country takes….. an actual investment!  Why must some in congress always think that there must a gimmicky way to provide these services.

    BTW, drilling-for-infrastructure only guarantees keeping us dependent on oil and NOT seeking other more sustainable transportation alternative.  We are positioning our country to be totally unprepared for a future when oil is scarce and very expensive.  If we are finding it hard to compete today in a world market, it will down-right near impossible in the near future with most other industrial nations doing much. much more to diversify their transportation infrastructure.  

  • guest

    If you haven’t got enough money to build more roads, don’t build them. Simples!

  • And then what about repairs??  Those aren’t getting done either. 

    Eisenhower got the Interstates built by implementing a Federal gas tax that was adequate to cover the cost of construction.  Why is that such an idea is impossible to get across to today’s Republicans AND Democrats. 

  •  nice post

  • Bopeters3

    What most people don’t realize is that as our vehicles have become more efficient, the actual total $ paid in federal gas taxes vis-a-vis the “gas tax” has gone down considerably in recent years.  Get this, the average driver today contributes a total of just $90 per year to the highway trust fund.  That’s far less than I feel the privilege of using the network including portions used to ofund other modes is worth!

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Expect Two (Radically Different) Reauthorization Proposals Soon

|
The Environment and Public Works Committee is getting ready to introduce their transportation reauthorization bill, according to reports by the Journal of Commerce. The committee has, shrewdly, worked closely with Finance Committee Chair (and EPW leader) Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT) on a way to pay for the bill, in order to avoid a situation like […]

Boxer and Inhofe Make Their Offer to the House, Try to Avoid 10th Extension

|
The time-and-venue change for Sen. Barbara Boxer’s press conference earlier today was apparently due to the fact that she was taking care of critical business: hand-delivering the Senate’s latest offer to the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. Chair John Mica (R-FL) wasn’t there to personally receive the document, which EPW Ranking Member James Inhofe joined Boxer […]

Mica, GOP Leadership Looking to Raise Transportation Spending Levels in Bill

|
According to yet another great report from Jeff Davis at Transportation Weekly, House Republican leadership has given House Transportation Committee Chair John Mica permission to seek additional revenues to fund the transportation reauthorization at levels $15 billion higher than initially proposed. One Republican source, quoted in Transportation Weekly, said that given the persistently high unemployment rates, […]

Boxer: Two-Year Transpo Bill Will Save 600,000 Jobs

|
Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA), chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, says a transportation reauthorization bill needs to be passed soon in order to avoid the loss of 600,000 jobs in the construction and transit industries. She issued a call to action this morning, pushing for a new bill before the current extension of […]

Sen. Boxer: Working With Mica, Inhofe on a Long-Term Transpo Bill

|
Senator Barbara Boxer told reporters today that she had an “excellent”, “wonderful” meeting with Rep. John Mica (R-FL), the new chair of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. She confirmed that they’re working on a “longer-term” transportation bill and have come up with many points of agreement. We’ll let you know more details about […]