As Nashville’s Mayor Pushes Light Rail to Win Referendum, What Will Happen to Buses?

Nashville's "nMotion" plan is a bold long-term vision for transit. But will the city also take care of the basics?
Nashville's "nMotion" plan is a bold long-term vision for transit. But will the city also take care of the basics?

It’s been more than two years since Nashville’s plans for the Amp Bus Rapid Transit line fell apart under a sustained Koch Brothers-funded attack. Since then, the city has elected a new mayor and decided on a new vision for transit. Yesterday, Mayor Megan Barry said a light rail line would be the first project funded under her plan, which is likely to go before voters next year. While that moves forward, there is a lot Nashville can do in the meantime to improve its lackluster bus network.

In the wake of Amp’s downfall, Nashville’s transportation authorities built a new regional vision for the transit network. Last September, they adopted nMotion, a 25-year, $6 billion blueprint that calls for everything from more frequent bus service to new BRT and light rail lines.

But implementing those plans requires money. Just this week, Republican Governor Bill Haslam signed a transportation funding bill into law that lowers general fund taxes while raising a smaller amount for transportation by hiking the gas tax and other fees. The law also includes a provision that allows local governments to increase taxes for transit projects, so long as the tax proposal secures a majority in a referendum.

Nashville Mayor Megan Barry. Photo: Metro Government
Nashville Mayor Megan Barry. Photo: Metro Government

Mayor Barry, who leads a joint city-county metro government and has made transit one of her top priorities, is pushing to get a referendum on the ballot next year. Early polls indicate that about two-thirds of residents support it. Yesterday, in her second State of Metro address, she said a new light rail line along Gallatin Pike in East Nashville would be the first branch of a rail network funded under the referendum.

It’s a good project — upgrading Nashville’s busiest bus route, according to Barry, and serving a working-class part of town. The question, however, is whether Nashville will also move forward on much-needed bus improvements that could make a difference citywide.

Building up Nashville’s bus service would be a quick, cost-effective way to get more people riding transit, which can help ensure the long-term success of big investments in light rail. Last month, the Nashville Metro Transit Authority asked Barry for what the Tennessean called a “whopping” $85.3 million, 427 percent boost to its bus capital program to, among other things, expand the bus fleet and allow the MTA to add new service.

In her budget released this week, Barry ended up giving the transit authority $35 million in capital funds, the newspaper reports. While it includes funding to replace older buses, as well as additional operational money to extend a couple of existing routes, there’s no capital funding for expanding the bus fleet.

A big bus boost can’t come soon enough: The MTA’s ridership, after dipping during the recession, has not resumed its pre-2009 pace. In fact, bus ridership has fallen 2.5 percent over the past year. And Nashville’s transit trips per capita are far below similarly-sized regions like Salt Lake City, Milwaukee, Providence, Austin, and Charlotte.

If Nashville wants to get more people riding transit, it can’t let its bus network slide.

  • Daniel

    without light rail, adding more buses and bus finding will produce only one outcome: more empty buses

    we saw this in LA when the BRU was given its way, leaving us only with more traffic and continued weak bus ridership

  • Kenny Easwaran

    I’m not sure what you’re saying about Los Angeles. That’s a city that has been spending hugely on light rail while cutting bus funding, and still has ridership that outpaces denser cities. Most of the low-performing lines have been cut, but if they were to just spend a little bit more on buses along Wilshire, Santa Monica, and Vermont, then Los Angeles could easily greatly grow its ridership.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

State Interference in Nashville BRT Could Have National Implications

|
Annie Weinstock is the regional director for the U.S. and Africa at the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy. Last week saw the quiet death of the misguided, Koch brothers-funded Tennessee Senate Bill 2243, which would have effectively banned real bus rapid transit in Tennessee. The Senate’s outrageous overreach, attempting to prohibit transit from using dedicated […]

The Koch Brothers Win: Nashville Abandons “Amp” BRT Plans

|
Nashville’s bid to build its first high-capacity transit line is dead, the Tennessean is reporting today. It’s a victory for the Koch brothers-funded local chapter of Americans for Prosperity and a defeat for the city’s near-term hopes of transitioning to less congested, more sustainable streets. The project, known as the Amp, called for a 7-mile […]

The Koch Brothers’ War on Transit

|
Transit advocates around the country were transfixed by a story in Tennessee this April, when the state chapter of Americans for Prosperity made a bid to pre-emptively kill Nashville bus rapid transit. It was an especially brazen attempt by Charles and David Koch’s political network to strong-arm local transportation policy makers. But it was far from […]

Koch Brothers Loom Over Maryland’s Purple Line Fight

|
Look whose envoy has been dispatched to undermine Maryland’s Purple Line. Once again, Randal O’Toole of the Koch brothers-funded Cato Institute has been deployed to attack a light rail project in distress. On Monday, the Maryland Public Policy Institute, a right-wing think tank, is hosting a debate on whether to construct the light rail project in the […]