FHWA’s New Goal: Eliminating Pedestrian and Cyclist Deaths in America

Pedestrian and biking safety has been lagging. Can federal officials reverse the trend? Graph: FHWA
Pedestrian and cyclist deaths account for a growing share of traffic fatalities in America. Can federal officials reverse the trend? Graph: FHWA

The Federal Highway Administration wants to eliminate pedestrian and cyclist fatalities “in the next 20 to 30 years.” In a new strategic plan [PDF], the agency calls for reducing serious injuries and deaths 80 percent in the next 15 years, which would be an intermediate goal on the way to zero.

FHWA also calls for boosting the share of short trips Americans make by biking or walking. It defines short trips as five miles or less for bicyclists and one mile or less for pedestrians. The agency’s goal is to increase the share of these trips 50 percent by 2025 compared to 2009 levels.

Now for the bad news. As admirable as these goals may be, federal transportation officials have limited power to see them through. Decisions about transportation infrastructure and street design are mainly carried out by state and local governments.

Nevertheless, the feds do have some means to influence street safety by changing design standards and using the power of persuasion. FHWA can certainly help move local decisions in the right direction. To encourage safer transportation engineering, the agency says it will ramp up its professional training and recognize states for making progress on walking and biking.

Here’s a look at some of the more promising ideas in the agency’s plan.

Promote safer streets through better design standards

One obstacle to safe streets is the widespread application of highway-style engineering strategies to local streets where people walk and bike. Wider and straighter roads might be better for cars-only environments, but they are terrible for pedestrian and cyclist safety.

FHWA has already taken steps to promote a more thoughtful approach to streets in built-up areas where people live and work. Last year the agency eliminated 11 of 13 car-centric design rules that imposed highway standards on many urban streets.

Now the agency is looking to normalize street designs proven to reduce injuries and deaths that are still considered “experimental” by the transportation engineering establishment. Cautious engineers remain reluctant to install designs without the blessing of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, but the committee that updates manual has been dragging its feet on approving designs like protected bike lanes, despite their established track record.

FHWA officials say they are going to intervene. The agency promises to “provide interim approvals under the MUTCD for new traffic control devices where research and experimentation are available to support such action. ”

Develop a uniform procedure to collect data and walking and biking

States and cities can’t evaluate their walking and biking programs if they have no idea how many people are walking and biking. But that is the situation most states and local governments are in.

Without going into specifics, FHWA says it will develop a national standard for measuring walking and biking rates, as well as how safe it is to walk or bike in a given place.

Reduce traffic speeds on urban streets

Finally, FHWA says it will “develop policies and promote strategies to reduce vehicle speeds on multimodal corridors.” Again, the agency doesn’t go into much detail about how that will be accomplished. But it does refer to previous FHWA guidance clarifying that engineers have leeway to set speed limits lower than traditional traffic studies have suggested.

  • Kevin Love

    “As admirable as these goals may be, federal transportation officials have limited power to see them through”

    That’s BS. The federal government can withhold money from states that fail to do what they want. That is how the federal government managed to violate the 21st Amendment to the US Constitution.

  • Kenny Easwaran

    The federal government can do that, but federal transportation officials can’t just decide to do that if Congress won’t give them the authority to. I believe most spending is allocated by Congress, with very limited authority for the officials to choose how to allocate funding among states.

  • Joe Commuter

    Not gonna happen. Slowing cars down and making conditions safe for walking and bicycling is too inexpensive and easy for anyone in government to take it seriously. Transportation safety is 100% political and neither majority in either party cares to make conditions safe for walking and bicycling. This is the effort of well-meaning and idealistic planners in the bureaucracy fighting the good fight, but we will not see meaningful progress toward safe streets within the next 50 years. Maybe I’m cynical. I’m exhausted fighting for safe streets and I’m not even 30 years old, props to the people that have kept at this longer than I have.

  • Jules1

    FHWA has tremendous authority over what does and does not get built. Just as they previously forced DOT’s to build projects to over-wide highway standards they can now force DOT’s to build projects that accommodate pedestrian, bicycle, and transit infrastructure. (Of course they have more authority when they have more money, but that requires an act of Congress)

  • neroden

    If they’d just stop widening roads, they’d be doing great. 10 foot lanes should be the maximum for urban streets.

  • socaldano

    Good traffic engineering based on science not conjecture is the ONLY way to reduce traffic deaths.

    But the all knowing commentators on here have clearly NEVER read a qualified scientific white paper on the subject

  • socaldano

    actually the MUTCD, which is approved by the nations professional engineers is the law of the land.

    Poor traffic engineering, such as recommended by the people on this list…increase accidents, deaths and other problems.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Federal Bike-Ped Funding Sets New High, With Much More Room to Grow

|
Graph: FHWA [PDF] Federal funding for pedestrian and bicycle projects reached a new high last year, according to a report released yesterday by the Federal Highway Administration. In terms of dollars, federal investment in walking and biking more than doubled compared to the previous high, set in 2007, thanks largely to an infusion of $400 […]

Phoenix Trying to Get a Handle on Pedestrian Deaths

|
Being a pedestrian in Phoenix is dangerous business. This is a place that comes by its reputation as a car-friendly city honestly. Phoenix pedestrians account for just 2 percent of collisions, but 42 percent of fatalities. That’s the fourth-highest share of overall traffic deaths in the country, behind three cities with much more walking — […]

FHWA Proposes to Let States Fail Their Own Safety Goals With Impunity

|
This story has been updated to reflect comments and clarifications from the FHWA. Secretary Anthony Foxx has made clear that safety — and specifically, safety for bicyclists and pedestrians — is a priority of his administration. If that’s true, his administration sure has a funny way of showing it. The Federal Highway Administration’s proposal on […]

The Case for Active Transportation, by the Numbers

|
Thanks to commenter Stephen for prodding us to post on the new report from the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, "Active Transportation for America" (download the PDF here). What makes the report notable are the numbers it contains. It’s jam-packed with quantifiable benefits that would result from increased investment in infrastructure that encourages and supports pedestrians and cyclists. […]

London Is Going to Ban the Deadliest Trucks From Its Streets

|
Heavy trucks with big blind spots are a deadly menace to cyclists and pedestrians. In Boston, eight of the nine cyclist fatalities between 2012 and 2014 involved commercial vehicles, according to the Boston Cyclists Union [PDF]. Between June and September this year, there were six cyclist fatalities in Chicago, and all six involved commercial vehicles. In New York City, drivers […]