America Has a Terrible Traffic Safety Record Because We Drive Too Much

apta_safety
Traveling by car is much more dangerous than traveling by train or bus. Table: APTA

Even though the U.S. traffic fatality rate per mile driven has fallen by two-thirds in the last 50 years, America today still has the deadliest road system per capita in the developed world. Much of the improvement from safer driving and better emergency care has been wiped out by increases in total traffic.

U.S. traffic fatalities have improved a lot on a per-mile basis, but not so much on a per-capita basis. Graph: APTA
Per mile, the traffic death rate in America has improved a lot, but per person, the nation has fallen far behind other developed countries. Graph: APTA

The American approach to traffic safety has emphasized seatbelt use, vehicle standards, and reducing drunk driving. What has been lacking is any effort to reduce driving mileage and enable more people to get around by safer means. And that’s exactly what the U.S. needs to do to make further gains in safety, according to a new report from the American Public Transportation Association [PDF].

Riding transit is much safer than getting around in a car. According to APTA, the fatality risk per mile traveled for bus passengers is 30 times lower than car occupants. For rail passengers, the risk is 20 times lower.

But federal safety policy has largely neglected how transit — or policies aimed at reducing driving in general — can play a role in reducing America’s staggering traffic death toll.

APTA argues that it’s time for a new approach. Here’s why.

Without good transit options, it’s harder to prevent “high risk” driving

Cracking down on drunk driving and imposing restrictions on young drivers — a primary focus of federal safety officials — has saved lives. But the practicality of these approaches is limited by the lack of convenient travel options besides driving.

Research indicates that access to transit can be an effective tool to keep the most dangerous drivers off the streets. APTA cites analysis of DUI rates around DC Metro stations that found crashes involving drunk drivers declined 70 percent after an increase in late-night service. A 2014 NHTSA study found that cities with good transit also have lower rates of unlicensed drivers. But federal officials haven’t incorporated transit or walkable development into their overall traffic safety strategy.

In places where transit ridership is high, traffic fatalities are low

There is a fairly strong relationship between traffic fatality rates in cities and transit trips taken. Graph: APTA
The link between traffic fatality rates and transit ridership is especially strong in larger cities. Graph: APTA

Cities with better transit have lower traffic fatality rates.

A 2014 study published in the Journal of Urban Health found that cities which increase transit mode share 1 percent can expect to reduce per capita traffic deaths 2.75 percent. APTA speculates that the effect is so large because high transit use is associated with other factors that also reduce risk — compact, mixed-use places shrink distances between destinations and enable people to reduce driving more than the amount that is directly replaced by transit.

In order for the U.S. to be a leader in traffic safety again, APTA says, safety officials need a “paradigm shift” in their approach, one that views increasing transit use as a key strategy.

Federal safety officials need a new multi-modal paradigm that promotes alternatives to driving, says APTA
Federal officials need a new multi-modal paradigm to “make mobility safer, “says APTA.

In response, federal safety officials have at least indicated an openness to considering APTA’s proposals. The National Transportation Safety Board responded with this tweet:

  • davistrain

    It may not be there anymore, but there used to be an off-ramp in San Francisco that fed cars off the freeway onto a city street via a gently curving roadway. After traveling at 50 or 60 MPH on the freeway, slowing down to a safe speed for a street gave drivers a feeling of going at three furlongs per fortnight.

  • davistrain

    Good luck finding a ship going where you want to go, when you want to go. The days of the great ocean liners came to an end not long after the first Boeing 707 went into service. Many sea lanes see passenger ships only when the cruise lines do repositioning cruises, such as moving the Alaska ships south to tropical waters in September. Most of the ships at sea nowadays are container ships or bulk carriers which are designed for efficiency, not speed. Imagine being stuck on one of those Hanjin ships that couldn’t enter the port at LA because the company couldn’t pay port fees.

  • Joe R.

    Traveling overseas is a want, not a need. If a ship doesn’t go where I’m going when I want to go, I don’t go. Not the end of the world. Also, there are loads of freighter traveling the oceans daily. My guess is finding a convenient ship wouldn’t be an issue. The speed is a nonissue. If I’m traveling by ship it means I already don’t care much about how long it takes. If it takes 7 days instead of 4 it’s not a tragedy. I’m the type of person who will only go overseas if I plan to spend many months there. In that context a few more days getting there is moot.

  • alexfrancisburchard

    Istanbul has the world’s worst or is top ten for congestion and is still incredibly safe. I read an article that said of the 15 million residents of this great city in the last 9 months, 28 have been killed in traffic accidents. That’s mind blowingly safe. I’m not sure if that article is leaving things out or something, but ~200/year is what I had known previously for the city, which is still insanely safe. People don’t die much in traffic here, and we have some of the very worst traffic. (at least out of the places they bother to try to collect data… I was reading about Dhaka that made it sound like Istanbul’s roads are wide open all day in comparison.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

2010s-MV-Deaths5

America’s Traffic Death Toll Is a National Disgrace

|
More than 40,000 Americans were killed in traffic last year, according to new estimates from the National Safety Council, the worst toll in a decade. The U.S. transportation system claims far more lives each year than peer countries. If America achieved the same fatality rate as the UK, more than 30,000 lives would be saved each year.

America’s Progress on Street Safety Is Pathetic

|
A new report from the International Transport Forum shows America is only falling farther behind all of its peer nations on street safety [PDF]. The traffic fatality rate in the United States (10.7 per 100,000 people) is nearly four times higher than in the United Kingdom (2.8 per 100,000) and close to double that of […]

2010 Traffic Fatalities Could Fill 70 Jumbo Jets. And This Is Good News?

|
Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood announced yesterday that 32,885 people lost their lives on our nation’s roads in 2010. While a staggering toll, this represents the lowest total number of traffic fatalities since 1949. “We’re making historic progress when it comes to improving safety on our nation’s roadways,” said LaHood in a statement, also pointing out […]
The American transportation system is dangerous because Americans have little choice other than driving. Photo: La Citta Vita/Flickr

AAA’s Latest Road Safety Report Ignores the Obvious: We Should Be Driving Less

|
The number of annual traffic deaths in America is heading in the wrong direction, climbing back above the 40,000 mark. To reverse this trend, the AAA Foundation for Road Safety this week released a report that prioritizes six road design changes it says would do the most to reduce the death toll. There's just one problem: AAA's report doesn't consider the idea that, to save lives, we should be driving less.