Civil Rights Advocates Challenge Missouri DOT’s Discriminatory Spending

In Missouri, urban residents receive only 35 cents in investment for every dollar they contribute to transportation funding. Rural residents receive $4.35. Graph: Missouri Coalition for Better Transit
For every dollar per capita that urban areas contribute to transportation funding in Missouri, the state returns 35 cents, while rural areas receive $4.31 for every dollar they contribute. Graphic: Missouri Coalition for Better Transit

Missouri, like many other states, shifts transportation funds from cities to rural areas — it collects most gas tax revenue from urban areas and spends it on roads in the hinterlands. And as in many other states, this amounts to a massive transfer of resources from the places where most people of color live.

But in Missouri, the scale of the problem is especially large, local advocates argue in a new report. Now they are challenging the state’s transportation policies on civil rights grounds — a campaign that could set a national precedent if successful.

In their report addressed to the U.S. DOT Department of Justice [PDF], the Missouri Coalition for Better Transportation argues that Missouri DOT violates federal civil rights laws prohibiting agencies that receive federal funds from creating a “disparate impact” on disadvantaged groups. The local NAACP is asking Congressman William Lacy Clay to file a civil rights complaint against the agency.

Here is an overview of the coalition’s case against Missouri DOT.

Restrictions on transit spending harm urban residents

Missouri is one of 23 states that forbids gas tax revenues from being spent on transit. The effect of this policy is fundamentally discriminatory against urban residents.

The constitutional ban is a relic of the 1950s, based on an outdated “farm-to-market” model of transportation needs when the state was far more rural, the authors note. Without access to gas tax revenue, local transit agencies struggle to provide service. As a result, the coalition says, transit ridership in Kansas City and Springfield ranks near the bottom among peer cities.

The coalition notes that the disparate impact manifests in alarming ways, like high infant mortality rates in black neighborhoods of Kansas City and St. Louis, where the lack of transit impedes access to medical care.

Massive transfer of resources from urban areas to rural areas

Excluding interstates, urban areas receive only 20 percent of state transportation funding, despite contributing 84 percent of revenues, according to the coalition.

motaxes
Even compared to neighboring states, Missouri’s bias against urban transportation needs is plain to see. Chart: Missouri Coalition for Better Transportation

Cities have to pay for their own roads, rural areas do not

MoDOT maintains almost every lightly traveled rural road between Illinois and Kansas. That adds up to 33,892 miles, making Missouri’s state road system the seventh largest in the nation, despite being the 18th largest state in terms of population and land area. A road system in proportion to other states would be nearly one-third the size.

Missouri cities, meanwhile, have to cover the cost of road upkeep themselves. MoDOT shirks responsibility for urban roads, maintaining only 19 percent of urban collector roads.

The same pattern applies to bridge maintenance. Over the last few years, the coalition says, Missouri spent 68 percent of its bridge repair money on rural crossings that carry only 17 percent of total bridge traffic, passing over urban bridges despite their bigger maintenance backlog.

  • Jeff

    Those charts are really interesting–any idea where I can get that data for other states?

  • rgbose

    Also note a lot of the driving in urban areas occurs on streets not maintained by sate DOTs.

  • There is a Brookings report at the top of this study (linked) that looked at urban “donor” states. That’s the best I could offer. i wish someone would do this for Ohio.

  • SDGreg

    This is a good example of the danger to cities of turning federal transportation spending over to states. it could result in an even greater shift in transportation spending to the rural welfare queens.

  • ahwr

    A lot of it is from tables you can get here:

    https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2014/

    State Highway Agency Capital Outlay and Maintenance – 2014

    Classified by Functional Systems

    https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2014/sf12.cfm

  • TakeFive

    This looks like a real moonshot to me. Fuel taxes in MO are actually a supplier tax and whether that makes any (legal) difference I wouldn’t know. But since MO residents are entitled to live wherever they wish and are allowed to drive anywhere in MO they want, I’m not sure the correlation dots connect to causation dots. Should be interesting.

  • john

    MOronic state that unfairly subsidizes urban drivers via MOdot.

  • Alicia

    But most people do most of their driving (or otherwise traveling/commuting) relatively close to where they live and pay their taxes… so I’m not sure what your point is.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Missouri, Welcome to the Era of the Broke State DOT

|
Word went out in a press release early last month: The Missouri Department of Transportation would be eliminating 1,200 jobs, closing 135 facilities and selling 740 pieces of equipment. “This is about survival,” said MoDOT spokesman Jorma Duran. “This is about making sure our roads and bridges continue to be maintained and operable.” Drastic times […]

UPDATED: Missouri Pols Launch Sneak Attack on Bike Funding

|
UPDATE (April 8, 2014 at 1:37 p.m.): The Missouri Bicycle and Pedestrian Federation reports that the amendment featured below has failed. Yay! The state of Missouri is aiming to bridge its transportation funding shortfall with a 1 percent sales tax that will generate $8 billion over 10 years. Rather than raising the gas tax, this regressive […]

Kansas City Residents to Missouri DOT: Enough With the Highways Already

|
Usually when we hear news from a Streetsblog Network member about the Missouri Department of Transportation, it’s because the agency is blocking ideas like a complete streets bill or a highway-to-boulevard conversion in downtown St. Louis. The advocates at BikeWalkKC report that now the agency is feeling some grassroots resistance to its cars-first approach: The […]

Will Missouri Voters Go Along With the Highway Lobby’s Money Grab?

|
Next week, Missouri voters will decide on Amendment 7 — a three-quarter-cent sales tax hike to pay for transportation projects that would be the largest tax increase in the state’s history. Construction industry groups have poured millions into convincing Missourians to pay $5.4 billion over the next 10 years. Will they bite? A coalition of pro-transit forces […]