A Transportation To-Do List for the Next President

How can the next president improve American transportation policy?

tcf_reportWithout wading into the spectacle that is the election, Beth Osborne, a former top official at U.S. DOT who’s now a vice president at Transportation for America, lays out a presidential agenda for transportation reform at The Century Foundation.

National transportation policy hasn’t fundamentally changed since Eisenhower, and Osborne says the next president should take a fresh approach. Here are the priorities she lays out:

1. Fix It First

Too many state DOTs are splurging on fancy new highway flyovers while their roads and bridges crumble. Osborne says the next president should demand they “fix it first.” The federal government should continue sending most federal transportation funds to states, but those funds should be restricted to maintenance.

The current system enables extravagant waste. Texas, for instance, recently borrowed $840 million in federally-backed TIFIA loans to build the $5.2 billion Grand Parkway — a third outerbelt for Houston. Meanwhile, the state is allowing 83 miles of rural road to return to gravel because it doesn’t have enough money to maintain them.

While they’re repairing infrastructure, states and cities should be considering whether they really want to hang on to their 20th Century infrastructure at all, Osborne says. When it came time for Rochester to rebuild its Inner Loop Highway — often described as a “moat” around the city’s downtown — the city got smarter. Instead of replacing it, parts of the highway are being filled in, opening up land for development.

Screen Shot 2016-05-10 at 2.43.47 PM

2. Ditch the Highways-vs.-Transit Funding Paradigm

The next president should do away with discrete funding pots for highways, transit, and (to a much smaller degree) biking and walking. The system should simply reward good projects, period, Osborne says.

Supporters of transit, biking, and walking might worry that this new system will result in lower levels of investment in those modes, since setting aside money for those modes was supposed to establish “a floor” for investment. Osborne argues that the current pots of money have in fact “become ceilings” and overhauling today’s funding structure would not tip the scales in favor of highways.

She also recommends “devolving” more federal funding to the local level, where transportation investments can be better coordinated with land use — so regions don’t end up wasting a bunch of money.

Osborne_Fig4

Here’s an example of the waste and dysfunction that can result when states and regions fail to coordinate land use and transportation investments: Greater Cleveland sprawled across five counties between 1948 and 2002, but it’s population remained roughly the same. Now the region is responsible for maintaining twice as many road miles, with the same population. Meanwhile, congestion and travel times actually increased.

3. Reward Performance

Instead of sending states what amounts to blank checks to spend however they wish, the next president should establish some quality control.

Osborne says agencies should have to make compelling arguments to receive federal support for their expansion projects. For example, if a state wants to receive funding to widen a highway, it would have to demonstrate that it can maintain its existing system.

The TIGER program, launched by the Obama administration, demonstrates how merit-based funding can help improve the quality of what gets built, Osborne says. “Knowing the competition is fierce likewise encourages applicants to find the lowest cost solution or to find as much local, state and/or private funds to match TIGER funds.”

The next president should also insist that the federal government assess how state and local governments put federal funds to use. Are they achieving goals like a safer, greener, more efficient transportation system, or are they pouring money into highway boondoggles? U.S. DOT is moving in that direction, slowly, by requiring states to track certain outcomes, like pedestrian and cyclist fatalities. But the next president could go farther, Osborne says. It’s not enough to have states set goals and measure progress. There should be concrete incentives to do better, and the federal government should reward good performance.

4. Make Users Pay

Finally, Osborne says the next president should stop bailing out the nation’s transportation program with general fund revenues and accounting tricks. A higher gas tax, expanding the use of tolling, instituting a vehicle miles traveled fee, or harnessing the power of congestion pricing would all be preferable to the status quo of endless gimmickry.

  • Glenn Scott

    I would add to point #2 along with road, water & sewer mains, all of utilities, surface water management and others.

  • ardecila

    The Texas comparison is apples to oranges. A big suburban freeway may be a more conspicuous example of big government funding, but even rural roads are very expensive in the aggregate and possibly carry less benefit. Texas’ decision is, quite frankly, a decision to prioritize urban areas over rural ones, even if the stated reason is tight budgets.

  • njudah

    when Congress changes hands and adults are in charge, you may have a shot at some of this. until then, they are primarily concerned with who uses a public bathroom, giving actual guns the vote, and supporting President Trump’s wall. Enjoy!

  • Vooch

    eliminate subsidies for mass motoring

  • douglasawillinger

    To fill in a trench freeway is a waste of money, and shows that the freeway removal movement which seduced people with starting with unsightly elevated freeways that arguably should be demolished, is way too dogmatic.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Obama Administration Working on Its Own Six-Year Transportation Bill

|
The annual powwow of thousands of transportation workers, planners, and wonks that’s known as the Transportation Research Board (TRB) conference kicked off in the capital yesterday with a candid admission from some senior U.S. DOT officials: reorienting American transport planning to accommodate the overlap with housing and environmental sustainability is proving pretty difficult. U.S. DOT […]

Polly Trottenberg Tapped For Senior U.S. DOT Spot

|
It’s a happy Friday for transportation wonks: the White House has nominated Polly Trottenberg, executive director of Building America’s Future, as assistant secretary for policy at the federal DOT. Polly Trottenberg, tapped as assistant DOT secretary (Photo: NewTalk) Trottenberg’s ascension signals that the Obama administration will make transit a serious priority and encourage a more […]

Would an Infrastructure Bank Have the Power to Reform Transportation?

|
Our report yesterday on transportation financing may have left you with a few more questions. We started with a look at TIFIA, which provides credit assistance for infrastructure projects. Many observers see the program as limited by its position inside the DOT and its opaque decision-making process. But what about a National Infrastructure Bank, you ask? Transportation […]

You Can Help Make State DOTs Accountable for How They Spend

|
Pressure is mounting on the president and Congress to keep roads and bridges from falling apart by increasing transportation funding. But a big part of the problem is states, which receive the lion’s share of federal transportation funds but opt to spend most on new roads, instead of maintaining existing infrastructure. Between 2009 and 2011, states spent just […]

Streetsblog Capitol Hill Q&A: Four Questions For Rob Puentes

|
America’s transportation and infrastructure policies affect literally everyone who moves from place to place in the country, but often they are under-discussed and over-simplified by the mainstream media. To help broaden the debate, Streetsblog Capitol Hill is kicking off a new Q&A series called "The Four Questions." Robert Puentes, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution’s […]