Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Bicycle Safety

Finally, a Little Accountability for State DOTs on Bike and Pedestrian Safety

In a win for bike and pedestrian safety, the Federal Highway Administration announced yesterday that it will require state transportation agencies to do something they have never had to do before: set goals to reduce bike and pedestrian fatalities, and track progress toward attaining those goals.

Photo: Bicycle and Pedestrian Information Center
Photo: Bicycle and Pedestrian Information Center
Photo: Bicycle and Pedestrian Information Center

The news is part of FHWA's roll-out of several "performance measures" for state and regional transportation agencies. The system of metrics is supposed to make the agencies more accountable for the billions of dollars in federal transportation funds they receive every year.

Advocates for walking and biking pressed FHWA to include bike and pedestrian safety measures in the performance standards, after they were initially excluded. Andy Clarke, former head of the League of American Bicyclists, now with the Toole Design Group, said the League helped solicit more than 11,000 comments in favor of creating performance measures for bike and pedestrian safety.

FHWA must have been listening. In its announcement, the agency said, "Non-motorized safety is of particular concern and improving conditions and safety for bicycling and walking will help create an integrated, intermodal transportation system that provides travelers with real choices." Translation: The feds value walking and biking.

A report last week from the Governor's Highway Safety Association found that pedestrians account for a growing share of total traffic fatalities in the U.S., a trend that didn't get any better in 2015.

"The performance measure makes sure non-motorized crashes actually count, and are counted and recorded in a way that will hold agencies accountable for addressing the issues they raise," Clarke said.

"Having the non-motorized measure will mean that a more holistic approach to traffic safety is likely -- as safety gains for one group are less likely to be made at the expense of another if we are tracking both," he added. "We know that making the streets safer for pedestrians first and bicyclists second helps make the streets safer for everyone -- the same is not necessarily true for measures that are designed to make the roads safer exclusively for cars."

If the new reporting requirements make an impact, it will be thanks to increased transparency, not financial incentives. State DOTs will be required to track their performance on bike and pedestrian safety, but won't be penalized in any way if their "performance" is lousy. However, they will be forced to report that lousy performance -- which is a start.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Denver Activists Hijack Road Signs To Decry The Dangers of Automobility

Plus: a few suggestions for holiday-themed hackers.

December 17, 2025

Which of Wednesday’s Headlines Came First?

A lot of Americans don't love driving, but really don't have much of a choice.

December 17, 2025

The Real Reason America Can’t Have The Tiny Japanese-Style Cars Trump Says He Wants

Trump is right that kei cars are super-kawaii — but he's wrong that clearing the regulatory decks is enough to bring them to U.S. shores.

December 16, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines Were So Much Older Then, We’re Younger Than That Now

Getting around without driving can be tough for anyone, but particularly seniors and children.

December 16, 2025

Boston’s New ‘CharlieCard’ Raises Privacy Issues in an Age of High-Tech Tracking

The new CharlieCard provides several benefits, but riders should also be aware of the military vendor that's operating the new system.

December 15, 2025

Ride E-Scooters, Do Crime? Study Explores Relationship Between Micromobility and Vehicle Offenses

"I suspect there are confounding factors that make the link from e-scooters to crime spurious."

December 15, 2025
See all posts