There’s a Nod to Complete Streets in the House Transportation Bill

Let’s be clear: The House transportation bill would be a big step backward for federal transportation policy. But it does include some ideas worth cultivating, including a nod to the idea that road projects should take walking, biking, transit, and access for people with disabilities into account. The problem is that the provision has no muscle behind it.

Photo: National Complete Streets Coalition
Photo: National Complete Streets Coalition

When the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee marked up its six-year transportation bill last week, an amendment put forward by Carlos Curbelo (R-Miami) and Dina Titus (D-Las Vegas) — the Safe Streets Amendment — was included, without modifications, as part of the “manager’s package.” That means Committee Chair Bill Shuster (R-Pennsylvania) accepted the amendment without a floor vote — a sign that it is relatively uncontroversial.

Of course, there’s no reason to object to an amendment that won’t have much of an effect on policy, and that seems to be the case here. Emiko Atherton of the National Complete Streets Coalition says the language in the House bill [PDF] isn’t as strong as the complete streets amendment added to the Senate transportation bill [PDF].

The House version says only that the U.S. secretary of transportation shall “encourage” states and metropolitan planning organizations to adopt standards for safe accommodation of all road users — meaning not just people in cars. The more robust Senate version instructs that states and MPOs “shall” adopt standards for accommodating all users.

“If the Secretary is encouraging states to establish [complete streets] standards, it’s going to encourage some states to do it,” said Atherton. “There will be some states or MPOs who don’t see it as a priority. And they might be like, ‘That’s really great but we don’t have to do this.'”

Atherton said she appreciates the sponsors of the House amendment but that if both bills reach conference committee, the National Complete Streets Coalition will be working to ensure that the language from the Senate’s version makes it into the final bill.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Just How Bad Is the Final House Transportation Bill?

|
Nobody was expecting the GOP-controlled House of Representatives to put together a transportation bill that did much for streets and transit in American cities. And they were right — there’s nothing to get excited about in the bill. But neither is it the total disaster for walking, biking, and transit it could have been. So how does the House bill […]

Compare the Senate and House Transpo Bills, Side-By-Side

|
Now that the Senate has passed a transportation bill and everyone’s waiting to see what the House will do next, Transportation for America has done us all a great service and compared the Senate’s bill to the House’s — well, to the last thing the House showed us before things fell apart for John Boehner’s […]

Two-Year Transpo Bill Moves on to Full Senate Without Bike/Ped Protections

|
The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee voted unanimously this morning to pass a two-year transportation reauthorization bill, moving the bill one step closer to passage by the full Senate. Unlike in the House, where the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee has full responsibility for the transportation bill, the Senate splits jurisdiction among several committees, so […]

Flashback: Obama Once Led Push for ‘Complete Streets’

|
With Congress out of town on its Memorial Day break, the nation’s capital is a quiet place to be — but all of that will change next week, as the appearance of the House transportation bill is expected to kick off an intense battle to reshape federal policy on transit, bikes, roads and bridges. Before […]

Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid of the House Transportation Bill

|
When a House of Representatives committee passed a six-year transportation bill last Thursday, it marked a milestone in Washington’s efforts to pass a long term transportation bill at long last. Problem is, the bill stinks. Previous House transportation bills were non-starters because they blatantly attacked funding for transit. The extreme right-wing of the Republican Party is still trying to do that, but for the […]