FHWA: Bike-Ped Investments Pay Off By Cutting Traffic and Improving Health

Marin County rebuilt an old railroad tunnel and created a 1.1-mile non-motorized path, expanding transit access and increasing biking by 95 percent. Photo: ##http://parisi-associates.com/projects/non-motorized-transportation-pilot-program/##Parisi Associates##
Marin County rebuilt an old railroad tunnel and created a 1.1-mile walking and biking path, improving access to transit and increasing biking 95 percent on the road leading to the tunnel. Photo: Parisi Associates

Nine years after launching a program to measure the impact of bike and pedestrian investments in four communities, the Federal Highway Administration credits the program with increasing walking trips by nearly a quarter and biking trips by nearly half, while averting 85 million miles of driving since its inception.

In 2005, the FHWA’s Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot Program (NTPP) set aside $100 million for pedestrian and bicycle programs in four communities: Columbia, Missouri; Marin County, California; Sheboygan County, Wisconsin; and the Minneapolis region in Minnesota.

Each community had $25 million to spend over four years, with most of the funding going toward on-street and off-street infrastructure. According to a progress report released this week, about $11 million of that remains unspent, though the communities also attracted $59 million in additional funds from other federal, state, local, and private sources.

“The main takeaway is, we’ve now answered indisputably that if you build a wisely-designed, safe system for walking and biking within the context of a community that is aware of and inspired by fact that it is becoming a more walkable, bikeable place, you can achieve dramatic mode shift with modest investment,” said Marianne Fowler of the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy and an architect of the pilot program.

Columbia reconfigured a key commuter intersection to making walking and biking easier and safer, resulting in a 51 percent jump in walking rates and a 98 percent jump in biking at that location. In Marin County, the reconstruction of the 1,100-foot Cal Park railroad tunnel and construction of a 1.1-mile walking and biking path provided direct access to commuter ferry service to downtown San Francisco and reduced bicycling time between the cities of San Rafael and Larkspur by 15 minutes. Biking along the corridor increased 95 percent, and a second phase of the project is still to come.

The program helped jump-start the Nice Ride bike-share system in Minneapolis, which grew to 170 stations and 1,556 bicycles by 2013, with 305,000 annual trips. And in Sheboygan County, the ReBike program distributed bicycles to more than 700 people and a new 1.7-mile multi-use path was built, following portions of an abandoned rail corridor through the heart of the city of Sheboygan. “Sixty percent of the population of Sheboygan County lives in close proximity to that corridor,” said Fowler. “And the trail gives them access to almost anything in Sheboygan.”

FHWA could see the impact: At locations where better infrastructure was installed, walking increased 56 percent and biking soared 115 percent. Using a peer-reviewed model, FHWA also estimated changes in walking and biking throughout the four communities. The program led to a 22.8 percent increase in walking trips and a 48.3 percent increase in biking trips. Without the interventions, residents would have driven 85 million more miles since the program launched, according to FHWA.

Those 85 million miles add up to a lot of traffic misery avoided and emissions not spewed into the air. The pilot program saved an estimated 3.6 million gallons of gasoline and 34,629 tons of CO2 emissions between 2009 and 2013 — not to mention the savings of 33.4 tons of hydrocarbon emissions, nearly 500 pounds of particulate matter, and 304.6 tons of carbon monoxide in 2013 alone.

While safety improvements across all four communities can’t be directly attributed to the program, FHWA estimates that “despite large increases in nonmotorized transportation, the pilot communities collectively observed a 20 percent decline in the number of pedestrian fatalities and a 28.6 percent decline in the number of bicycle fatalities from 2002 to 2012.” Pedestrian injuries went down between 18 and 55 percent in each of the four communities.

Meanwhile, bicyclist injuries increased in three of the four communities, but “bicycling injury rates (incidents per number of trips) declined between 8.6 and 38.2 percent in each of the four communities.” That kind of statistic — injuries and deaths per bicycle trip — is hard to come by in most of the U.S., where bicycle trips are largely uncounted.

The health benefits of the bike-ped projects are more clear-cut. FHWA writes: “Based on the added bicycling trips observed just in 2013, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates reduced economic cost of mortality of $46.3 million.”

As these investments continue to entice more people to walk and bike, they’ll make an impact long into the future. “Depending on future walking and bicycling trends in the pilot communities, the pilot communities’ nonmotorized transportation investments could avert 266 million VMT over the next ten years,” says the FHWA report, “and other benefits, such as health, safety, and environmental benefits, would increase under similar potential scenarios.”

  • Kevin Love

    “…with most of the funding going toward on-street and off-street infrastructure.”

    Where did the rest of the funding go to?

  • There’s a UC Study that shows that people that bike can *gasp* get hurt, which is completely different than the utter safety of driving a car or walking.

  • Guest

    Great to know there’s no such thing as car/pedestrian accidents. Thanks Bob!

  • Welcome – I’m here to help

  • Jeffrey Baker

    Pensions.

  • Kenny Easwaran

    Presumably at least some went to data collection, staffing, studies, and other administrative features that are essential if we want to get the projects done right, and find out what the results actually are (as reported here).

  • mrebeling

    It differed per pilot community. I managed the Sheboygan County Pilot from 2006 – 2010. In Sheboygan, the money was also spent on bike parking, production of comprehensive bike/ped plan, sidewalk gap filling, SRTS planning, events like bike/walk to work week, education (e.g. bicycle rodeos, law enforcement safety training). Staffing and admin costs were also a part of the expenses.

  • flug32

    They did quite a lot of education and outreach in Columbia. A series of bike ed classes and so on, public relations work to encourage people to bike and walk more, outreach programs to neighborhoods to encourage people to walk, and so on.

    FYI the summary portion of the study came to this conclusion about these activities:

    “Balancing timing of community outreach and education with infrastructure investments: Some NTPP pilot communities deployed outreach and education projects throughout the NTPP timeframe, which they believed helped increase familiarity with new nonmotorized transportation facilities as they were added to communities’ pedestrian and bicycle networks – matching growing interest and enthusiasm with improved facilities. Other communities that made more intensive investments in outreach at the beginning of the NTPP timeline, before infrastructure projects were completed, felt that more gradual and strategic outreach and education may have been more effective.”

    See other conclusions here: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bicycle_pedestrian/ntpp/2014_report/page05.cfm#Toc386020197

  • flug32

    And this is a bad thing because . . . ?

  • Pete

    “…the utter safety of driving a car or walking.”

    The #1 killer of children in the USA (between 2-24 years old) is automobile crashes, and you might want to take a look at a recent study on global road deaths by the International Transport Forum, which I’ll paraphrase: “This year’s data takes a look at who is dying on the road in different countries. Some of it is predictable — and, if it weren’t so tragic, it would be cliché. In The Netherlands, which has the highest cycling population, bicyclists are the highest share of fatalities. In Italy and Greece — countries known for scooters– it is the “powered two-wheeler” riders who are a higher share of the fatalities. And in the U.S., it’s car passengers.”

    When you normalize the numbers by mode share – which is difficult because there’s no good way of tracking the many people like me who drive, bike, and walk about equally – riding a bike in the US is statistically only slightly more fatal than riding in a car, despite what fearmongers want you to believe.

    People who stay at home and type on the Internet are pretty safe though… 😉

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

TIGER V a Shot in the Arm for Livable Streets in Cities and Small Towns

|
Out of 585 applications, U.S. DOT has chosen 52 transportation projects in 37 states to receive TIGER awards totaling $474 million. The Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery program was originally an element of President Obama’s 2009 stimulus package. Although it hasn’t been reauthorized and many Republicans claim to hate it, funding somehow keeps being appropriated for […]