Did Progressive Parking Policies Propel Pittsburgh Past Detroit?

This parking map of downtown Detroit has been making the rounds, following news of the city’s bankruptcy. It’s a striking image: Close to 40 percent of downtown Detroit’s develop-able land is parking, local experts say.

We thought it would be interesting to contrast it with a city that has a similar history to Detroit but is currently performing much better economically: Pittsburgh. Despite its rust belt history, Pittsburgh has a very progressive parking policy.

Here’s Detroit, surface lots in red, garages in orange:

Image: Data Driven Detroit. Orange shows garage parking, red shows surface.

Now Pittsburgh: buildings in brown, garages in red and blue and surface lots in grey.

Pittsburgh. Garages are show in red and blue. Surface parking in grey. Image via ##http://www.visitpittsburgh.com/access/## Visit Pittsburgh##

Policies enacted by Pittsburgh have helped discourage solo car commuting. The city issues a 40 percent tax on parking throughout the city. It’s the highest tax of its kind in the country, and at one time it was an even higher 50 percent. In 2006, the Pittsburgh City Paper reported the city was generating about $44.5 million a year from parking taxes — more than it was making from taxing resident income.

Detroit issues no special tax on parking. The city as a whole, like most U.S. cities, uses parking minimums that artificially inflate parking, but the rules are relaxed somewhat downtown, says Rob Linn, formerly of Data Driven Detroit, maker of the above Detroit map. (Linn is now with the Southwest Detroit Business Association.)

Linn said he thinks the preponderance of parking in downtown Detroit isn’t so much a result of parking regulation, but the way the city taxes land.

“Parking lots are taxed as vacant lots; buildings are taxes at a much higher rate,” he said. “It sort of weirdly discourages you from doing anything with your land.”

The way commuters get to downtown Detroit and downtown Pittsburgh offers a pretty stark contrast as well.

Clearly, there’s also a straightforward connection between land use and commuting, although its debatable whether too much parking is the cause or the effect of Detroit’s relative car dependence. Linn points to the city’s pitiful transit system as a contributing factor to the parking problem.

 

  • Anonymous

    Factor in freeways and auto lanes, and it is clear that Detroit is literally >75% owned by the auto industry.

  • ? I grew up in Pittsburgh, when its pollution was so bad it was a national punchline. Everyone pointed at the steel industry, but then the parking lot attendants went on strike and nobody could commute downtown. It was the first time I remember the weather reports mentioning acceptable air quality.

    That was a real eye-opener for me.

  • RichD

    How much of this a result rather than a cause of a better-performing local economy? Pittsburgh, unlike Detroit had its “eds and meds” to fall back on after it lost its major industry (steel). Detroit had the auto industry and nothing else. Pittsburgh’s middle-class exodus was also not nearly as pronounced as Detroit’s and land values never plummeted as low, especially in downtown.

    Geography is a factor as well. Downtown Pittsburgh is surrounded by water on two sides and a steep hill on the 3rd. Detroit is pretty much perfectly flat by comparison and has no natural barriers besides the Detroit river (compare this to say, Seattle vs. Houston — hilly and surrounded by water vs. flat and not surrounded by water). Downtown Detroit suffered from more divestment and “urban renewal” than did downtown Pittsburgh leading to having much more room for surface parking lots.

  • Anonymous

    Detroit had the auto industry and nothing else largely because it destroyed its downtown area (which tends to concentrate high-skilled industries) by building freeways through it and parking lots for the people using these freeways. They destroyed the main advantage of downtowns vs industrial/job parks in suburbs: better interconnectivity and the ability to create strong nodes in certain industries.

    The concentration of jobs and offices creates a lot of opportunities for an economy. When Pittsburgh suffered from the collapse of the steel industry, the municipal authorities used tax policies to make sure that the downtown area wouldn’t be divested and to favor investments (tax land, not property, to force owners of vacant lots or unused buildings to sell rather than speculate). Detroit on the other hand kept building highways and parking lots, which are a very inefficient use of space in urban areas and which destroyed the job density required to fuel economic growth.

  • Jana Wallace

    OK, now you’ve hit a nerve.
    Having grown up in the Detroit area being part of a family that regularly went to downtown Detroit for entertainment and family time, much to the horror of our friends/neighbors, most of those red lots on the Detroit map had buildings on them when I left the area in 1984. Its not as if Detroit officials said, “Hey, let’s knock down these vital, fully occupied buildings (they were vacant and dangerous) so we can build parking lots all over the place.” When no one wanted to locate a business in Detroit during the previous 25 years, private entrepreneurs (esp recent Slavic & Middle Eastern immigrants) used some of those newly vacant lots by purchasing or renting them and running them as parking lots.

    What anti-parking folks don’t seem to have found in your research is that Detroit’s elected and top bureaucrats siphoned off millions of dollars from taxpayers/vendors over many, many decades. Bleeding the City of its revenues, sky high tax rates to partially compensate for the bled revenues, lack of constituent representation due to the absence of wards/districts, and the fat/lazy/happy/rich approach to automotive design and manufacturing in the 1970s & 1980s by the Big 4 (AMC was later absorbed by GM) are the factors which lead to Detroit’s downfall. Further, the Detroit metro area’s public transit org, SEMCOG and Wayne County were also plagued by resource siphoning by its elected officials and top staff.

    Making things worse, starting with Henry Ford’s $5/day scheme for unskilled assembly line jobs, Detroit became the destination for hundreds of thousands of uneducated people (black and white) from the South & foreign lands (including my grandfather) who came to Detroit to make a good living without the need for any training or education. Not surprisingly, many of the children/grandchildren/great-grandchildren of those uneducated folks believed there was absolutely no reason to spend money on a college education when they could earn $35/hr screwing on bolts at “Ford’s, GM, or Chrysler’s.” When the bottom dropped out of the US car manufacturing in the late 1970s and early 1980s, tens of thousands of former assembly line workers found themselves with few job opportunities since they lacked skills and education. They scrambled to get even low paying jobs as grocery store cashiers, Kmart shelf stockers, or waiting tables.

    Finally, is it surprising that people who lived in the world’s Automotive Capital didn’t want to bother with, much less pay for, a comprehensive public transit system? Unless you grew up there, it is difficult to imagine how car culture dominated/dominates the lives of the people and businesses in the metro Detroit area. Unlike Detroit, no Pittsburgh steelworker used his product to go to church, pick up girls, or to go see Aretha Franklin and the Temptations. No one in Pittsburgh looked at the locally made product and thought, “Wow, I never thought of Pete as a Chevy guy. He seems more like a Ford guy – didn’t
    his dad work at the Rouge plant for 30 years?”

    As I said at the top of my email, outsiders telling everyone that Detroit is messed up gets on my nerves. I know Detroit is a mess and I appreciate
    solutions – not blaming the imploding of America’s formerly wealthiest city on too much parking.

  • Dan

    Actually, Pittsburgh lost about half of its population during its downtown exodus, same as Detroit. The big difference is that Pittsburgh diversified and didn’t rely solely on industry to get the job done. Yes, “Eds and Meds” were our fallback, but there’s so much else going on in Pittsburgh economically that it’s difficult to justify saying it was UPMC and CMU that pulled Pittsburgh out of the fire.

    There’s also the fact that Pittsburgh has always been a very walkable city – public transit has long been a part of the city’s DNA, though out T-transit (rail cars) could definitely be expanded outside of the South Hills and downtown areas.

    Detroit, on the other hand, had it’s fair share of race riots and white flight in the early 40’s and again in the 60’s. Detroit has never had a reliable public transportation system, as the auto industry subsidized a lot of the city’s development.

    When it comes to parking, it’s ALWAYS been tough to find in Pittsburgh. There was never a time where parking downtown was easy to do, which lead a lot of people to take the T or a bus to commute. Not to mention, our rush hour traffic is some of the worst in the nation – and it’s getting worse as population increases due to Buzzfeed lists about how Pittsburgh is the greatest city ever. Not that I’m disagreeing, but let’s keep it on the DL, please? We don’t want Fred Armisen creating a TV series about us, too.

  • Brian Hill

    A few quick notes on Pittsburgh. Many of the garages on the map are part of mixed-use buildings (for example, the red triangle northeast of the number 10 is the parking garage under the USX building, the largest office tower in Pittsburgh). A lot of the the surface lots on the map are in the process of being redeveloped. There are also new garages being built (either as part of mixed-use buildings or as part of new mixed-use developments), but all that should still be a big net win for density and walkability.

    I agree there is a chicken-and-egg problem here. Even more than Eds and Meds, jobs growth in Pittsburgh has recently been led by Professional and Business Services and Financial Activities. That’s driven down Class A Office vacancies Downtown, and also made it easier to finance Class B/C to residential conversions. So there is likely causation going both ways.

  • Burkitt

    “Detroit has never had a reliable public transportation system”

    Circa 1945, this was the Detroit streetcar network https://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&oe=UTF8&msa=0&msid=203728989602421142072.0004874dddc1d1e99088f .

    They had a comprehensive public transport system, but like many other cities they destroyed it between 1945 and 1960.

  • Linda Nawrocki

    I remember Pittsburgh in the last 90s and Fifth Avenue was a ghost town and there were still “adult” joints on Liberty. The Collapse of the Steel Industry devastated this city.

    Pittsburgh managed to hang in there with empty buildings and has been revitalized by the eds and meds, but really you can’t forget the Natural Gas industry. Also, the fact that people realized they can ‘live’ downtown. Most of those buildings that were offices are now being used for places to live. Downtown has a 96% occupancy rate – the highest in the country.

    It also helps that although downtown got a bit sketchy, it never was dangerous. Sorry Detroit, my brother lived in Center City and it was not the safest place.

  • Josh

    The map of Pittsburgh is at least 11 years old.

  • Nathanael

    The only solution is to stop being a “company town” and kill the “car culture”, which you have rightly pegged as the original sin of Detroit.

    It’s a curious original sin. Back in the beginning of the 20th century, GM, and Ford both made buses, and before that, they made railcars and streetcars — the obssession with roads had not taken over yet. But at some point they decided to go all in on cars, and that spelled doom. I still don’t know why they did that.

  • Nathanael

    Detroit made special efforts to actively destroy their public transportation, and was one of the key locations of the GM/Firestone/Standard Oil streetcar destruction conspiracy.

    Being a company town was bad for Detroit. When the auto industry decided to destroy streetcars, they destroyed the city along with the streetcars.

    Pittsburgh lost many of its streetcars, but some of them survived (and are now the T).

  • Ginzberg

    Why do the Pgh and Det columns in the “Mode” table each add up to less than 90%? Is there a carpool mode that’s missing, perhaps?

  • detroit urbanism

    It’s actually the parking, sorry. Arguments about local culture are nonsense. It’s a policy decision that we don’t have a transit system anymore.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Parking vs. Everything Else: An Aerial Map of Downtown Detroit

|
The above map, produced by Data Driven Detroit, comes to us though the satirical Facebook page Michigan Needs More Parking. It shows downtown Detroit with parking highlighted in orange and red: garages in orange, surface lots in red. “We must do something about all of these non-parking blocks holding back Detroit,” writes Michigan Needs More […]

A Fix for Parking Craters Gains Momentum in Providence

|
Like many American cities, Providence has a downtown parking crater problem. About 70 acres of prime land in the central business district is occupied by surface parking. James Kennedy, a local advocate who blogs at Transport Providence, is on a mission to fix the problem. Inspired by a similar policy in Pittsburgh, he wants the city […]

How Silver Spring, Maryland, Outgrew Its Parking Lots

|
In healthy urban areas, people always complain that there’s not enough parking. And they still do that in Silver Spring, Maryland, says Dan Reed at Greater Greater Washington. But they’re wrong. The city’s downtown parking supply is only about 58 percent occupied on an average day. Even as the city has grown, more parking is sitting […]

What’s the Best Way to Tax Parking?

|
Taxing parking, the way Pittsburgh does, can make downtowns livelier and encourage a healthier mix of transportation options. Of course, implementing these policies can get tricky. A recent report from the Victoria Transport Policy Institute [PDF] delves into the issue and sorts out the best way to go about it. At his blog, Transport Providence, James Kennedy considers […]

Parking Crater Prevention: Which Cities Are Doing It Right?

|
Does your city have a parking crater problem? If so, it’s probably time for an ordinance prohibiting property owners from demolishing buildings and turning them into parking lots. In the 1990s, this type of legislation helped dramatically transform part of Denver from a surface parking wasteland into more of a real downtown. Today, other cities are […]