Metro Atlanta’s Sales Tax “Savings” Will Come at a High Price

It’s rare that a region attempts a transportation vote as potentially transformative as the one that took place Tuesday in Atlanta. And even though voters elected not to act — voting down a package of 157 transit and road projects totaling more than $7 billion — that doesn’t mean nothing’s going to change for this sprawling, southeastern metropolis.

Voters Tuesday rejected a spending package that was aimed at tackling the region's notorious congestion. Photo: ##http://www.wsbradio.com/news/news/wsb-traffic-center/nC7qX/## WSBradio##

Many are sorting through the possible implications. The Naked City blog, reporting from Charlotte, called the defeat “terribly disheartening,” but predicted the region’s leaders wouldn’t give up on the issue. The Congress for New Urbanism and Richard Layman focused on where the campaign went wrong. Adie Tomer at The New Republic and the Brookings Institution says residents of greater Atlanta are going to find themselves paying for this decision, even without the tax hike:

Besides missing out on major new projects, the voters’ rejection poses some other problems in the immediate term. Without the extra revenues, Atlanta’s leadership will have difficultly leveraging newly expanded TIFIA funds from the federal government. Instead, they will cede the advantage to other metros with referendums on the books. Advantage: Los Angeles, Phoenix, and Oklahoma City.

Just as importantly, the region’s transportation bill still rose this morning — but with no new projects to show for it. According to our own reading of Georgia’s Transportation Investment Act of 2010, any district with a ‘no’ vote would cause their local responsibility for state transportation maintenance and improvement grants to rise from 10 percent to 30 percent. That’s right, Tea Party activists: you’re still paying more.

Now, Atlanta’s business and residential leaders need to wait at least two years for a follow-up vote. And while the national record is strong for referendums passing on follow-up tries, Atlanta’s 63 percent rejection suggests TIA supporters have quite a bit of work to do. Those supporters can start with an information campaign; Atlanta’s regional residents need to know more about the costs of inaction, and how investments in one locality can benefit residents and businesses of the whole region.

The Texas Transportation Institute estimates that Atlanta commuters spend an average of $924 a year just sitting in traffic jams. Nobody likes paying taxes, as the Georgia Tea Party so deliberately highlighted in this case. But driving, especially long distances and in heavy traffic, isn’t cheap either. Now, as in the past, many of the region’s residents will have little choice but to spend their time and money idling on congested freeways, or waiting long periods for the next bus.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Stop and Move reports Amtrak ridership in California continues to climb, most dramatically in the region where the first phase of high-speed rail construction is scheduled. The Fast Lane announces an awesome-sounding new federal program that will train governors in livability principles. And Let’s Go Ride a Bike shares details on Nashville’s coming bike-sharing system.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

6 Transportation Ballot Initiatives to Watch Next Tuesday

|
Next week, voters in Maryland and Wisconsin may tell state officials to keep their greedy paws off transportation funds. Louisianans will consider whether to create an infrastructure bank to help finance projects. Texans will weigh the wisdom of raiding the state’s Rainy Day Fund for — what else? — highways. And Massachusetts activists who have […]

Funding Transit in St. Louis: Another Crack at a Sales Tax

|
Cities and counties across the country are struggling with the funding of their transit systems in these hard times. In New York City, the payroll tax solution touted in Albany last year has failed to meet projections. In Lorain County, Ohio, the rejection of a sales tax by voters resulted in crippling cutbacks to that […]

Transit Vote 2016: Raleigh’s Chance to Grow Smarter

|
We continue our overview of what’s at stake in the big transit ballot initiatives this November with a look at Wake County, North Carolina. Previous installments in this series examined Indianapolis, Seattle, Detroit, and Atlanta. Ask Wake County Commissioner Sig Hutchinson how Raleigh’s transit system is currently functioning, and he doesn’t sugarcoat it. “I just really don’t think we’ve got […]

CA Voters Reject Measures With Lots of Highway Money and a Dash of Transit

|
On Tuesday night, voters approved major transit improvement plans in Los Angeles, the Bay Area, Atlanta, Indianapolis, Raleigh, and Seattle. There were other types of transportation measures on local ballots — they focused on highway expansion and lumped in transit funding as a secondary consideration. TransitCenter reports that in California, highway-centric packages didn’t have the same appeal as transit-focused ballot measures: Consider California. While […]