A Freeway Revolt Is Brewing in Dallas

If growth is what we're focused on, then that is growth the highway may trigger regionally, i.e. outside of the city of Dallas boundaries. If we're thinking that could induce investment in South Dallas, what kind of investment might that be? More gas stations and XXX shops, the eventual highest and best use of highway frontage property? South Dallas needs less car dependence and more empowerment via legitimate street networks, transit, and walkable infrastructure. More highway capacity simply adds more drivers and more dependence upon the car. It is South Dallas that will feel that pain the most.

If congestion relief is the goal, then shouldn't we be tolling existing roads first? Ya know, working demand levers rather than new supply which has been proven over and over again to only be a temporary solution before inducing more traffic?

Considering the budgetary woes this city, like all public agencies across the country, is facing, profligate spending doesn't seem to be the best direction. Particularly when it is founded on conventional wisdom from the 1960s through 1980s. It was pretty illuminating when you said that other North Texas cities will capitalize on mistakes that Dallas makes. So we're competing against Waco and Waxahachie, now? Hardly world class, innit? Meanwhile, the cities at the top of the global competition food chain are removing freeways. And you know what? They're inducing growth that way, back to the hearts of cities, by removing a structural impediment to livability and desirability while cutting the umbilical cord dependent places use to take advantage of host cities, like parasites. Cities are funny adaptable things.