Skip to content
by Ben Goldman
I can’t stand the Reason Foundation’s simplistic and ideologically loaded snark when talking about smart growth, but at least they framed the issue better by asking “Is Smart Growth Good, Great or Terrific?” The Times on the other hand perpetuates the tired tradition of using “New York” and “smart growth” as interchangeable terms by asking “Should Los Angeles New Yorkify?” This tradition does a great disservice to the promotion of understanding about what smart growth is, and what its positive applications are to the unique circumstances of the city/region in question. But I’m just nitpicking =)
Glad to see some guy doesn’t have his head burried in the sand of debt means can’t do anything!
“Finally, DOTs are admitting what the data has been telling them for the past ten years: Traffic is not increasing. It's flattened out overall and decreasing per person. This will lead to more sensible investments in transportation.”
In response to "It's Happening: Washington State Revises Traffic Forecasts to Reflect Reality"