Obama Counters Gas Price Demagoguery With Commitment to Fracking

Here's what the administration wants you to know about its energy security efforts: It may have no impact on gas prices, but oil companies are drilling away! Source: ##http://www.whitehouse.gov/energy/gasprices#.T14r7HSssjw.facebook##White House##

It’s been almost a year since the Obama administration released its Blueprint for a Secure Energy Future, but more importantly, it’s been two weeks since Energy Secretary Steven Chu got chewed out for not caring enough about lowering gas prices. And Newt Gingrich, whose presidential campaign is slipping into irrelevancy, can still do some political damage with his claim that he could bring gas prices down to $2.50.

So, the administration is taking this opportunity to show off what it’s done to reduce the nation’s dependence on oil with its one-year progress report on the blueprint.

Two weeks ago, Chu said something in a Congressional hearing that vaguely hinted that reducing gas prices so Americans could continue to guzzle fuel in SUVs was not actually his top priority. Here’s how it went: Rep. Alan Nunnelee (R-MS) was grilling Chu about what the department was doing to lower gas prices. Nunnelee wasn’t impressed by Chu’s talk of developing “cost-effective” alternatives, like new battery technologies and natural gas – he wanted relief from high prices now.

Nunnelee started to ask, “But is the overall goal to get our price —”, but didn’t finish the sentence before Chu replied, “No, the overall goal is to decrease our dependency on oil, to build and strengthen our economy.”

It’s the “no” that killed Chu. The point he was making is unassailable – that the administration is looking far beyond day-to-day price fluctuations and toward real economic and environmental sustainability. But all conservatives heard was the “no” and went around proclaiming that President Obama’s energy secretary is still trying to “figure out how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels in Europe,” as he advocated in an interview with The Wall Street Journal before assuming his current position. (He has since repudiated that idea.)

The revised blueprint comes at the perfect time to bring home what Chu actually meant in his comments to Nunnelee. But it’s not all the rosy picture environmentalists might have wished for.

The first thing the report highlights is the fact that domestic oil production has increased every year Obama has been in office, reaching the highest level since 2003. Then it goes on to boast about the administration’s advances in natural gas, much of which is extracted through an extremely dangerous and dirty process known as fracking. All this means oil imports are down to 45 percent of U.S. consumption, from 57 percent when Obama took office. That’s not so exciting when you realize what it’s being replaced with.

The blueprint update includes a section on transportation, which mainly focuses on clean fuels, long the focal point of the president’s green jobs agenda. Obama tightened fuel economy standards for trucks, supported research into electric-car technology, and invested in biofuels and, again, natural gas as alternatives to oil. All of these innovations, of course, aren’t enough to make up for the wastefulness of car dependence.

The report does include a section on livability, which mostly focuses on building efficiency but also discusses TIGER and other administration efforts to improve transit options. President Obama has recommended permanently authorizing TIGER with an allocation of $3.4 billion over the next six years, as well as doubling transit funding over the last reauthorization. The report boasts about the administration’s increased capital construction grants for transit agencies, its State of Good Repair funding, and its investment in zero-emissions buses.

The administration is justifiably proud of its call for the elimination of $4 billion of fossil fuel industry subsidies. But the report exaggerates U.S. leadership on international climate efforts, gives a cringeworthy shout-out to the domestic nuclear industry, and includes an embarrassingly short shout-out to high-speed rail and Amtrak’s skyrocketing ridership.

The section on the future, meanwhile, is notably short on transit and smart growth. It’s mostly about ARPA-E’s research into new, “clean” technologies. It even seeks to emulate “the concentration of brainpower and resources that defined the Manhattan Project.” What if we already have all the technology we need and we just need the will to switch to a healthier, more sociable, more sustainable lifestyle?

Meanwhile, in a companion infographic extravanganza, the White House is emphasizing that its policies don’t actually impact gas prices – contrary to Gingrich’s claim. The price of oil is set on the world market, dictated by world events like the Arab spring and the financial crisis, the White House asserts – and is driven up further by greedy oil companies. And domestic drilling – while a cornerstone of the administration’s “energy security” policy, as shown by the blueprint – “will never meet our energy needs.” Check out the infographic here.

  • Danleyc

    While a noble goal, why do we not understand that bicycling and walking, and even transit cannot replace the gasoline powered internal combustion engine used by virtually all cars, trucks, etc. in the country? Folks, someday perhaps we will choose another fuel source, but our entire economy is predicated on oil. If you are sensitive to things like the cost of food, the cost of products, and the millions of people whose jobs are based on tourism and recreation….then you too should be seeking cheaper fuel prices. What this administration is failing to understand is that our economy is already hanging by a thread and companies who MAY hire workers soon, will now at best delay hiring until prices come down. 

  • chars_missing

    @6b3d974e5520fbd9fa40293b12171c2b:disqus: I think you’re kinda missing the point, we have 2% of the world’s oil reserves and we use 20%… the president is just being pragmatic by acknowledging we simply can’t drill our way to cheap gasoline (as it is, we’re already drilling like crazy and it hasn’t even made a dent).

    The left has more or less accepted the situation. We need to find alternatives to oil, sprawl and car-centric planning (you know, like the rest of the world). But the right just wants to double down on crazy ideas (invading Iran, drilling in national parks, etc.) instead of facing reality.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

What Went Unsaid at Last Night’s Debate

|
At last night’s presidential debate in Nassau County, the best opening for Barack Obama and Mitt Romney to talk about transportation policy came when undecided voter Phillip Tricolla asked the following question of the President: QUESTION: Your energy secretary, Steven Chu, has now been on record three times stating it’s not policy of his department […]

Energy Policy Straight Talk From Elizabeth Kolbert

|
Back in his Straight Talkin’ days Senator John McCain acknowledged that offshore drilling wasn’t a viable solution for America’s energy troubles. In 2003, he broke with the Bush Administration and co-introduced legislation to reduce carbon emissions, by, in effect, imposing a price on them. McCain had a reputation for being a politician who told the […]

Billionaire Oil Driller Serving as Romney Energy Advisor

|
When it comes to transportation and energy policy, it’s tough to tell exactly where Mitt Romney stands, but there’s a lot to be learned by watching whom he’s keeping close. Yesterday we covered how his VP choice, Paul Ryan, looks to be a policy disaster for sustainable transportation. Ryan indicated in his attention-grabbing but largely […]