No Accountability for State DOTs on Highway Projects

Complete a project on-time and on-budget. Or blow deadlines, run into setback after costly setback, only to return to the funding source with outstretched hands.

Louisiana's $94 million Interstate 49 extension went $9 million over budget. Photo: ##http://www.marshfieldnewsherald.com/article/20111211/CWS0101/312110038/Little-oversight-40B-federal-highway-construction-spending##Marshfield News Herald##

In the view of the Federal Highway Administration, it makes little difference. Each year this agency hands out roughly $40 billion in highway money based on federal formulas to State DOTs and then, it effectively steps aside — unless additional funding is requested.

Although the federal government provides almost 80 percent of the funding for highway projects across the country, a vast majority are subject to little to no federal oversight, according to an analysis by Gannett News. And that leads to a lot of waste.

While even the most mundane transit projects like Troy, Michigan’s $8.5 million Amtrak station undergo intense scrutiny by so-called fiscal watchdogs like Mayor Janice Daniels, the classic money-waster — the old, over-budget highway-to-nowhere projects — almost always escapes even the most superficial level of quality assurance.

More than half of federally funded highway projects run over budget, and 45 percent are late, the analysis shows. And whether a state is a consistent top performer or a virtual money pit, the Federal Highway Administration lacks the authority to impose best practices.

FHWA has expanded scrutiny for major projects — those that cost more than $500 million. But this year, just 87 of 136,000 FHWA-funded projects fell into that category.

Cited in the article is an analysis by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials finding that State DOT performance varies wildly, from some budget-faithful all stars like California, Georgia and Texas — that complete 85 percent of projects on target — to an unidentified state agency bringing up the rear at 13 percent.

Here are some of federally financed fiascoes cited by Gannett that have gone completely unpenalized:

• The reconstruction of Westchester County, New York’s Interstate 287 is more than two years behind schedule and $78 million, or 14 percent, over budget. This project has so far has cost taxpayers $621 million, more than $72 million per mile.

• The state of Louisiana’s 36-mile Interstate 49 extension from Shreveport to the Arkansas border was completed for $96 million — 9 percent over budget. The highway abruptly ends at the Arkansas line with no connector planned until at least late 2014.

• Ohio’s US 30 was completed nearly a year late and $13 million — or 13 percent — over budget. The day before groundbreaking, $700,000 was added to the contract because the cost of replacing any wetlands destroyed during construction wasn’t included.

Underscoring the lack of federal oversight is the unfortunate reality that most states do little performance analysis themselves. A report last year by the Government Accountability Office found that 30 states said political support was a key variable in selecting projects. Only 11 states said the same about economic analysis.

AASHTO President Kirk Steudle, also Michigan’s Transportation Director, said he and his fellow state transportation officials oppose greater federal oversight of highway projects out of concern about a “national one-size-fits-all measurement that doesn’t fit all.” Meanwhile, Kenneth Mead, who was inspector general for the U.S. Transportation Department from 1997 to 2006, has been one of the biggest advocates for reform.

“They’re talking about a new surface authorization, and we hear jobs, jobs, jobs,” he said. “But I think there ought to be discipline to this.”

Meanwhile, House Highways and Transit Subcommittee Chairman John Duncan (R-TN) told Gannett reporters he is interested in adding performance measures to the transportation bill currently in progress.

  • Not to mention that projects are routinely WAY over-engineered to the point that they greatly increase even the projected design cost of a project.

    A recent NJDOT project in my hometown to replace a crumbling highway bridge was so overbuilt that I suspect that the unnecessary additions to the project probably added $2 million to the total projected cost of $24 million.  The project was built with redundant exit and entrance ramps that literally allow drivers two options to get on and off the highway no matter what direction they wish to go.  To make matters worse, the highway engineers felt compelled to put in two completely unnecessary traffic lights at intersections that see only one vehicle every 30 seconds. Each one of those lights cost an estimated $200,000 and could have been replaced with $1,000 stop signs.   Now instead of drivers coming to stop and then going they need to sit and wait for 40 seconds, for no one!!!  So much for Level of Service!

    At best, I feel that highway engineers are stuck in their own echo chamber but I’m starting to be believe that they purposely over-engineer their designs to help bump up their own consulting fees.

     

  • @2995d81157fecd50fe4b728419a38787:disqus That project you cite probably won a design award from AASHTO.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Obama’s New Transportation Budget: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

|
With federal transportation funding on track to run dry by May 31, Washington lawmakers are gearing up again to reset national transportation policy… or, if that doesn’t work out, to limp along indefinitely under the status quo. Today President Obama unveiled his opening bid in this process. The $478-billion, six-year plan from the White House includes many […]

Can State DOTs Be Trained to Kick the Sprawl Habit?

|
I had the chance to listen in yesterday to top staffers from USDOT explain their collaboration with HUD and the EPA — the "Partnership for Livable Communities" that was first unveiled in March and touted again by President Obama in July. Three officials, including one of Ray LaHood’s top deputies, Beth Osborne, outlined their plans […]

Federal Court: Wisconsin Uses Bogus Traffic Data to Justify Highways

|
State departments of transportation all over the country use specious traffic projections to justify hugely expensive road widening projects. That’s how you end up with the graph on the right — showing how DOTs continued to forecast traffic growth year after year, even as driving stagnated. Wisconsin DOT is perhaps the most notorious manipulator of traffic […]

Putting TIGER Spending in Perspective

|
The House’s current transportation spending bill calls for reducing the share of federal spending that goes to TIGER, a grant program for sustainable transportation projects in cities, from $500 to $100 million. The budget, meanwhile, holds highway funding steady. TIGER is an enormously popular program. In its second year, it received close to 1,000 applications […]

How State DOTs Got Congress to Grant Their Wish List

|
Bike and pedestrian funding got slashed. Federal assistance for transit operations was rejected. Even the performance measures – arguably the high point of the recently passed federal transportation bill – are too weak to be very meaningful. For Americans who want federal policy to support safe streets, sustainable transportation, and livable neighborhoods, there were few […]