Mica, GOP Leadership Looking to Raise Transportation Spending Levels in Bill

According to yet another great report from Jeff Davis at Transportation Weekly, House Republican leadership has given House Transportation Committee Chair John Mica permission to seek additional revenues to fund the transportation reauthorization at levels $15 billion higher than initially proposed.

John Mica is conspiring with top GOP leadership to lift transportation funding levels above those outlined in April by Budget Chair Paul Ryan. Photo: ##http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2011/0405/Medicare-How-Paul-Ryan-s-budget-would-change-it##Christian Science Monitor.##

One Republican source, quoted in Transportation Weekly, said that given the persistently high unemployment rates, the surface transportation bill may become the centerpiece of Republicans’ alternative agenda to the president’s proposed jobs bill.

The House reauthorization bill, introduced by Mica in July, followed the budget plan outlined in April by Rep. Paul Ryan, setting transportation spending at the level expected to come in through Highway Trust Fund revenues over the next six years. Transportation officials, advocates, and Democrats have decried those numbers as spelling starvation for the transportation program, especially for many innovative programs that have been introduced over the last few years.

The appropriations committee followed suit a few week ago, approving spending at those low levels. But by then, Republican leadership was reportedly having second thoughts. Jeff Davis writes:

House Republican leaders privately tried to dissuade the Appropriations Committee from moving a 2012 spending bill with the lower Trust Fund spending numbers, but it would have been awkward for the Speaker or Majority Leader to publicly criticize a Republican committee chairman for writing a bill at the budget level that 235 Republican House members voted for five months previously.

Sources say Mica and Republican leadership are seeking about $15 billion a year in additional revenues, providing a very significant boost to the spending outlined in the reauthorization proposal Mica released in July:

House transportation reauthorization proposal, ##http://republicans.transportation.house.gov/Media/file/112th/Highways/Reauthorization_document.pdf##"A New Direction"##

Adding $15 billion to each of those years could allow for spending totals above current baseline numbers of $41.6 billion for highways and $8.4 billion for transit in FY2012. However, it still wouldn’t quite match the Senate proposal, a two-year bill funding the surface transportation program at almost $55 billion a year. (The highway/transit split hasn’t been defined in the Senate bill.) Sen. Barbara Boxer says these levels essentially reflect current spending levels, plus inflation, plus an expanded TIFIA loan program.

Still, Davis writes, finding new revenues will be major challenge. A raise in the gas tax is reportedly off the table, and any new taxes would be difficult to pass – and not just because of the prevailing anti-tax sentiment in Congress. The Transportation Committee doesn’t control taxation, and Davis speculates that any new taxation would likely have to wait until after the deficit-reduction super committee finishes its work, two months from now. And any significant funding source outside of the gas tax and related “user fees” would be a dramatic departure from the traditional way of funding the transportation program.

  • Luckbag01

    People will always look for the next new thing. Today it’s content; yesterday, it was social media
    M58072
    M58071
    M58070
    m58056
    M45244
    we are sold about the louisvuitton bag like the vuitton

  • tinyurl.com/4skyaqr

  • Irvindawid

    this is indeed interesting – I guess it remains to be seen where these extra funds will come from (“$15 billion a year in additional revenues…”).  Being the pessimist that I am, I can’t see this happening – esp. when you look at the current debate about spending for FEMA purposes – whether they need to be offset or not).

  • Anonymous

    Anything short of the Senate bill is a cut. Mica’s originally proposal was absolutely insane and never had a chance of passing. This proposal is closer to sanity, but it’s still terrible policy.

    There’s these little concepts called “inflation” and “population growth” which mean that you have to increase funding by about 4% per year just to maintain current service levels.

  • looking from the eyes of this man, I can see that this man is too confidence, I do not like him.

  • John Wirtz

    Common sense prevails?  Can it be true?

  • 80p

    Don’t get too excited. Increased funding does not equal policy changes. Not saying highways don’t need the money for repairs, but this is not the complete answer people might be thinking it is. Also, be careful where this extra money comes from. Boehner hinted at this plan when he gave a speech about combining energy and transportation bills. The Republicans took a solid hit from the FAA shutdown for sure, and any increased attention to transportation is a good thing, but be wary.

  • Anonymous

    “TI-FI-A! TI-FI-A! TI-FI-A!”

    Sincerely,

    Los Angeles

    http://thesource.metro.net/topic/america-fast-forward/

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Mica Drops Chairmanship Bid, Endorses Shuster

|
Rep. John Mica (R-FL) has withdrawn from the running to remain chair of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. He was up against Republican term limits, which specify that no Congressmember can spend more than six years as the highest-ranking member of their party on a committee — regardless of whether that time is spent […]

Finally: Rustlings of a Reauthorization

|
First, the House and Senate pledged they’d have a bill marked up by Memorial Day. Then it was definitely going to come in June. (One staffer even told me that they were still planning on it coming “in the spring,” so it would be before the summer solstice — June 21.) But it looks like […]

Mica Transpo Bill Shrinks Spending 33%, Eliminates Bike-Ped Guarantee

|
House Transportation Committee Chair John Mica’s proposed transportation reauthorization bill includes $230 billion over six years, a reduction of 33 percent compared to spending levels in the last multi-year bill. The proposal, which he unveiled at a standing-room-only press event in the committee hearing room today, eliminates any federal guarantee (he calls it a “set-aside”) for […]

Mica Won’t Say Where Transpo Funding Will Come From; LaHood Defends TE

|
House Transportation Committee Chair John Mica (R-FL) said this morning that getting permission from Republican leadership to find more revenues to fund the transportation bill was a “major breakthrough” but still won’t say where the money will come from. Mica told an audience at a Washington Post-sponsored forum on transportation that passing yet another extension […]