Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Barbara Boxer

Highwayman Inhofe Still Wants to Rob Bike/Ped Funding From Transpo Bill

Last week, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) briefed reporters on the points of consensus reached by the four leaders of the Environment and Public Works Committee with regard to the transportation bill. In answer to a question by Streetsblog, she said that guaranteed federal funding for bike and pedestrian programs would be in the bill. She made it clear that bicycling and walking were important modes of transportation that deserve “good attention” in the bill.

The Oklahoma River trails: 13 miles of uninterrupted multi-use paths in Sen. James Inhofe's home state. Photo: ##http://www.flickr.com/photos/tomfs/2975760763/##flickr/tomfs##

Some advocates doubted she was speaking for all members of the committee, especially ranking Republican James Inhofe of Oklahoma, who has repeatedly attacked bicycle funding and other transportation enhancement projects as wasteful and inappropriate recipients of federal money.

Those skeptics appear to be right. A Tulsa newspaper reported earlier this week:

Differences also cropped up between [Boxer and Inhofe] on projects such as bike paths and walkways.

Boxer said all modes of transportation should be covered, while Inhofe made it clear the committee should keep its focus on projects such as bridges and highways.

"She was not speaking for me," he said.

Committee staff had followed up Boxer’s comments with a disclaimer that the bike/ped section was still being written, though they didn’t overtly dispute her assertion that active transportation funding would be preserved in the bill. They won’t give any further comment since the issues are still under negotiation.

“We hope the federal government will continue strongly investing in safer and more livable streets,” said Michael Murphy of Transportation Alternatives. “We don’t think that street safety is a partisan issue and we hope it won’t become one.”

Boxer likes to say that although she's one of the most liberal members of the Senate and Inhofe is one of the most conservative, on issues of infrastructure investment, they see "eye to eye." However, in the course of EPW hearings on the issue, serious differences have cropped up, especially over active transportation funding.

Advocates have worried at times that Boxer was so enamored of the idea that transportation is one issue she and her ranking member agreed on that perhaps she wouldn't fight hard over their differences.

It appears that finding bipartisan consensus, even on the issues the committee has now managed to find agreement on, has been difficult and frustrating, implying that there are still many issues that divide them. Boxer will have to continue to fight for healthy transportation alternatives for her constituents in California and around the country.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

If Thursday’s Headlines Build It, They Will Come

Why can the U.S. quickly rebuild a bridge for cars, but not do the same for transit? It comes down to political will and a reliance on consultants.

May 2, 2024

Wider Highways Don’t Solve Congestion. So Why Are We Still Knocking Down Homes for Them?

Highway expansion projects certainly qualify as projects for public use. But do they deliver a public benefit that justifies taking private property?

May 2, 2024

Kiss Wednesday’s Headlines on the Bus

Bus-only lanes result in faster service that saves transit agencies money and helps riders get to work faster.

May 1, 2024

Freeway Drivers Keep Slamming into Bridge Railing in L.A.’s Griffith Park

Drivers keep smashing the Riverside Drive Bridge railing - plus a few other Griffith Park bike/walk updates.

April 30, 2024

Four Things to Know About the Historic Automatic Emergency Braking Rule

The new automatic emergency braking rule is an important step forward for road safety — but don't expect it to save many lives on its own.

April 30, 2024
See all posts