Ohio, Wisc. Rail Money to be Transferred to 13 Other States

Ohio’s and Wisconsin’s loss will be 13 other states’ gain.

U.S. Department of Transportation announced this afternoon that nearly $1.2 billion in passenger rail money will be withdrawn from the states of Ohio and Wisconsin at the behest of their incoming governors. The money will be transferred to other states to support “high speed rail projects already underway.”

Photo: ##http://www.fox6now.com/news/politics/local/## Fox 6 Now##
Photo: ##http://www.fox6now.com/news/politics/local/## Fox 6 Now##

California, Florida and Washington State come away as the big winners, receiving up to $624 million, $342 million and $161 million respectively. Those funds will help advance plans to connect San Francisco to San Diego, Tampa to Orlando and Portland to Seattle.

Each of the recipients were granted less money than they originally applied for in their HSR application, according to Justin Nisly, a spokesman for DOT. The additional funding will allow these states to further their plans.

“I am pleased that so many other states are enthusiastic about the additional support they are receiving to help bring America’s high-speed rail network to life,” Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said in a statement accompanying the announcement.

Even Wisconsin will receive $2 million to improve its Hiawatha Amtrak line from Chicago to Milwaukee.

Here is the way the money will be distributed in more detail:

  • California: up to $624 million
  • Florida: up to $342.3 million
  • Washington State: up to $161.5 million
  • Illinois: up to $42.3 million
  • New York: up to $7.3 million
  • Maine: up to $3.3 million
  • Massachusetts: up to $2.8 million
  • Vermont: up to $2.7 million
  • Missouri up to $2.2 million
  • Wisconsin: up to $2 million for the Hiawatha line
  • Oregon: up to $1.6 million
  • North Carolina: up to $1.5 million
  • Iowa: up to $309,080
  • Indiana: up to $364,980
High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Program Investment Map, via ##http://www.fra.dot.gov/rpd/passenger/2243.shtml## USDOT##
High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Program Investment Map, via ##http://www.fra.dot.gov/rpd/passenger/2243.shtml## USDOT##

USDOT said they will review the contracts to determine whether Ohio and Wisconsin will be forced to reimburse the federal government for any portion of the money already spent. Funding was pulled after Wisconsin governor-elect Scott Walker and Ohio governor-elect John Kasich each indicated an intent to halt passenger rail projects underway in their states when they take office next month.

A total of $8 billion was distributed around the country to promote high speed rail as part of the President’s Economic Stimulus bill last year.

Rail advocates in Wisconsin had been protesting Walker’s plans to kill the project and forfeit a $810 million federal grant to connect Milwaukee to Madison. Rail proponents were hopeful recently that at least some of the money could be salvaged to support passenger rail in a different form.

Meanwhile, in Ohio, Governor-Elect Kasich had written President Obama requesting permission to reallocate Ohio’s $400 million grant to highway and freight rail projects. LaHood responded that the money could be used only for passenger rail.

Just this week, Ohio’s current Governor, Ted Strickland, wrote a letter to Kasich, urging him to reconsider his position. Rail proponents in Ohio had been circulating a petition to present to Kasich when he takes office.

A variety of states have been angling for the money since Walker and Kasich were elected. Officials in North Carolina and New York and other states had expressed interest in competing for the funds.

Rick Harnish, executive director of the Midwest High-Speed Rail Association, said the loss of funds in Ohio and Wisconsin is a big blow to the region.

“It’s a very sad day for the Midwest economy,” he said. “We really need to build stronger links between our cities.”

  • JJJ

    It’s a sad day for the midwest, but good news for everyone else.

  • Brandi

    Elections have there consequences. Hopefully this will make more people pay attention to transportation in future elections. Still a shame though as the Wisconsin project would have been fairly popular.

  • MAT

    Glad to see the Obama Administration show some gumption on something. Still, this money would have been more effectively used if focused entirely on the Top 5 states (CA, FL, WA, IL, and NY) that may actually pull this off in a reasonable amount of time.

  • Scott Mercer

    Yeah, we’ll take the money here in California. We will use it well. We will have a nice high speed rail line, at the very least from Bakersfield to Fresno. Even if nothing else gets done, that will speed up the trains considerably, even if the only advantage is that these tracks will be reserved for passenger service only, no delays due to sharing the tracks with freight.

    I hope the voters in Ohio and Wisconsin got a cold splash of reality today. This is what happens when you elect Republicans: your tax money gets spent in some other state, NOT your own. The money doesn’t just go back into your wallet.

    And now that the CAHSR line will be connecting two large (ish) cities with the first segment (Fresno and Bakersfield) maybe all the self-appointed experts calling this first segment “the train to nowhere” can SHUT UP and let the professionals get on with the important task at hand: building up America’s infrastructure.

  • Alan

    I’m Wisconsin born & bred. Scott Walker was my state Senator all the way back; some of my first political memories involve doing lit drops against him with my mama.

    For the first time, Scott Walker has made a decision that benefits me. But that’s because I’m a California resident & taxpayer now.

  • karl newman

    I’m pretty excited about this. If Illinois gets more money, we may have better service from Iowa City to Chicago. At least some parts of the midwest will have service. Glad I moved my business from Columbus to Iowa City. Go Governor Kasich! Thanks for making Illinois and Iowa great.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Columbus, Ohio, Wants In on the Midwest Rail Renaissance

|
Columbus, Ohio, population 800,000, is among the biggest U.S. cities without passenger rail. But its time may have finally come. A college town and state capital, Columbus has bucked the trend of urban decline in Ohio and built a strong economy on insurance and retail. The culture here has been famously resistant to rail plans, but it’s […]