Will GOP Senators Acknowledge the Fiscal Sense of Livable Communities?

Last week, the Livable Communities Act cleared the Senate Banking Committee, a milestone for legislation that would fund local efforts to plan for growth while curbing sprawl. But the 12-10 party line vote raised the prospect that the bill might also encounter unified Republican opposition in the full Senate, where the threat of a filibuster has become the norm.

One GOP senator’s "no" vote seemed especially incongruous — Utah’s Bob Bennett. The vast majority of the people whom Bennett represents live in the region centered around Salt Lake City, which has made significant strides in recent years to coordinate housing development and transit investments — exactly the sort of initiatives that the Livable Communities Act would reward.

“There are many, many things in this legislation that I strongly support," Bennett said during the subcommittee vote, before explaining why he would not support the bill. “There are things in this legislation that… would get in the way of what we are already doing in our state. So I will reluctantly vote against it.”

The remarks provoked some head scratching from advocates familiar with the regional planning efforts underway in Bennett’s home state.

“I can’t imagine why he would say that,” said Kate Rube, policy director at Smart Growth America. "You would think a state like Utah would really stand to benefit from that bill."

“I’m not sure what he was referring to,” said Alan Matheson, executive director of Envision Utah, a non-profit that advises municipalities
on smart growth strategies. The group’s planning
work focuses on coordinating transportation and housing policies while preserving
open space. In the past, Matheson said, Bennett “has been a great supporter of the collaborative approaches we have taken in Utah.”

The Livable Communities Act, which would disburse competitive grants to communities of all sizes to both plan and build projects that reduce car-dependence and provide better access to transit, would stand to benefit the planning work that Envision Utah has facilitated. "If there was a way to supplement local funding, it would enable us to go beyond regular planning efforts to go to important implementation work," Matheson said.

Bennett’s office had no further comment as of yesterday afternoon.

Conservatives like Bennett may look at the bill and frown on the $4 billion in federal grants that it would distribute. “One could be in favor of high-density neighborhoods with transit, but it’s another thing to say the federal government should be pushing that,” said Mark Calabria, director of financial regulation studies at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank.

But the bill creates incentives, not mandates, and it has strong backing from local governments who need the resources to plan for more sustainable growth. Only communities who apply for grants and meet funding requirements will get money, said Daria Daniel, associate legislative director for the National Association of Counties, a strong supporter of the bill.

“Some states have passed their own sustainability efforts,” Daniel said. "This would not usurp what state or local governments have already done."

envision_utah_1.jpgEnvision Utah built support for transit-centered growth in part by communicating the high public costs of development based mainly on building detached housing (scenarios A and B). Graphic: Envision Utah

If politicians are concerned about new spending, she added, not investing in sustainable communities will cost more in the long run than the grants in the Senate bill. The example of Envision Utah is again instructive: The organization built public support for a transit-centered growth strategy by showing how typically sprawling growth patterns would exert a much higher toll in the long run.

“It could cost you more in the future not to plan for the future,” Daniel said.

The Senate bill now awaits a vote on the floor; the corresponding House bill has yet to pass a committee vote. In his remarks at the Senate committee hearing, Bennett said he would be open to continuing discussions on the bill.

  • Will GOP Senators Acknowledge the Fiscal Sense of Liveable Communities?
    No; why would you think they’d let reality cloud their fascist vision of the world?

  • Larry Littlefield

    Most people drive, and are set in their ways, so from a cynical identity politics point of view, this is the kind of crap our crap pols do. I wouldn’t credit Republicans or Democrats with an ideology.

    But if they had one, I would expect Republicans to be anti-transit. Mass transit makes the most economic sense in the largest cities, which Republicans have always been skeptical of. And that isn’t their political base.

    Historically, mass transit was built by the private sector while the automobile infrastructure was created by the government, but at present mass transit is operated by unionized public employees working for monopoly providers, and you are dependent on transit you are dependent on them, with no choice. Another situation Republicans oppose.

    And culturally, Republicans might find the togetherness of mass transit flies in the face of their individualistic vision, compared with a community experience.

    Democrats might be in favor of mass for the same reasons.

    But why would anyone be against bicycle transportation, which provides a mix of individualism and a communal experience, and requires limited government involvement? And the implementation of bicycle infrastructure costs less than the consultant fees for anything else.

    As for state vs. federal effort, I have the solution. Let the federal government take on the full cost of Medicaid, thus creating the “public option.” And let it get out of transportation funding altogether.

  • But why would anyone be against bicycle transportation, which provides a mix of individualism and a communal experience, and requires limited government involvement?

    Because they are selling “success,” and bicycles are not successful. Somehow that doesn’t stop them from calling bicycles “elitist,” but consistency is not their strong suit.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Livable Communities Act Clears Senate Committee

|
The Senate Banking Committee voted 12-10 yesterday in favor of the Livable Communities Act, legislation that would bolster the Obama administration’s initiatives to link together transportation, housing, economic development, and environmental policy. Shaun Donovan, Ray LaHood, Lisa Jackson: Together forever? The Livable Communities Act would codify the partnership between HUD, US DOT, and the EPA. […]

Dodd’s Livability Bill Earns Praise from Local Governments

|
With financial reform nearly complete, the Senate Banking Committee turned its attention today to one of Senator Chris Dodd’s (D-CT) next priorities, the Livable Communities Act. Local government came out strong for the initiative to promote sustainable and integrated regional planning, with representatives of the nation’s cities, towns, counties, and regional planning organizations testifying in favor. Among committee members, […]

Dodd Vows to Pass Livability Bill Amid Skepticism From Rural Senators

|
Even as the Obama administration ramps up its work on a sustainability initiative that treats transportation, housing, and energy efficiency as interconnected aspects of development policy, the effort remains without an official congressional authorization — a situation that Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-CT) vowed to fix yesterday. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd […]

Senate Health Bill Holds Onto Grants For Healthier Transportation

|
Back in June, when the Senate was in the early stages of its marathon health care reform debate, several Republicans blasted the  proposed legislation for including a grant program aimed at encouraging construction of local infrastructure to promote healthier movement. The new Senate health bill held onto a billion-dollar grant program to promote walking to […]

Bunning Throws in the Towel, Congress Restores Transport Funding

|
Workers at the U.S. DOT and on transportation projects around the country are back on the job today after Sen. Jim Bunning (R-KY) lost his politically hazardous battle against a 30-day extension of federal infrastructure law and unemployment benefits. Sen. Jim Bunning (R-KY) (Photo: CNN) But while Republicans sought to distance themselves from Bunning’s five-day […]

Flashback: Obama Once Led Push for ‘Complete Streets’

|
With Congress out of town on its Memorial Day break, the nation’s capital is a quiet place to be — but all of that will change next week, as the appearance of the House transportation bill is expected to kick off an intense battle to reshape federal policy on transit, bikes, roads and bridges. Before […]