Consensus on National Transport Goals Still Eludes Industry Pros

Policymakers and private-sector players seem to be struggling to agree on how — and whether — to set national performance targets for America’s transportation system, as evidenced by today’s debate at a high-profile infrastructure conference.

interstate_traffic.jpg(Photo: UVA)

"Performance-based" is a popular buzzword in transportation circles, where clear and definable national standards are seen as the best way to improve efficiency, cut emissions, and marshal public support for shared sacrifice to improve the system.

But the lone congressional proposal to set national transportation goals, including an annual reduction in per-capita vehicle miles traveled and a focus on repairing existing assets, has languished on the Hill.

The current long-term House transport bill leaves the difficult question of measurable performance targets to state DOTs and metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs), which could have a vested interest in keeping the bar low.

Given that uncertainty, attendees at today’s University of Virginia infrastructure policy conference spoke of forging consensus on how to achieve a "performance-based" system.

Yet the very question of setting national goals appeared to divide and disillusion several speakers.

"Everyone agrees that performance ought to be the driver," said Mortimer Downey, President Clinton’s deputy Transportation Secretary and current chairman of the firm PB Consult.

"[But] I’m concerned when I see legislation come out," Downey said — however "well-intentioned" that legislation may be — that attempts to set transportation performance goals for the states. National goals, he added, shouldn’t turn into "national diktats."

Steve Heminger, executive director of the San Francisco area’s MPO, said specific national goals were "the key missing ingredient" that could restore public faith in the importance of transportation spending. "They need to be readily understandable … things that states and metro areas can be rewarded for meeting and penalized for failing."

Still, Heminger sounded pessimistic about the public’s willingness to coalesce in support of a set of transportation targets. The interstate highway system built during the Eisenhower era "was something everyone could rally around," he said. "We’re never going to have that again."

Craig Lentzsch, a former Greyhound president who served on the federal panel that recommended a 10-cent gas tax increase earlier this year, emphasized the need for specificity in what transportation dollars would be used for rather than the environmental benefits that would result.

"If you pick a goal, you may be inherently picking a winner from the mode system," Lentzsch said.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Why Are State DOTs So Afraid of Accountability?

|
Deron Lovaas is the federal transportation policy director for NRDC. A version of this article appeared on his blog this morning. In this era of constrained resources, the country must move toward performance-based management and accountability for results in all sectors — including transportation. It’s a Culture of Consequences, in the words of the RAND […]

Transportation for America Releases Blueprint for Transportation Reform

|
Today Transportation for America is releasing a 100-page document called "The Route to Reform," in which they outline policy recommendations related to the upcoming reauthorization of federal transportation funding legislation (download the executive summary here or the full report here).  From the executive summary:  The next transportation program must set about the urgent task of […]

Streetsblog Q&A: Bush DOT Chief Endorses National Transport Goals

|
Mary Peters, who spent four years as George W. Bush’s Federal Highway Administrator before taking over the U.S. DOT in 2006, has entered the simmering debate over whether Washington should set performance goals for the nation’s transportation system. Her answer: "Absolutely." Former Transportation Secretary Mary Peters (Photo: IU) Peters, who is now working as a […]

New Report on Transpo-Health Dynamic Makes Case for National Targets

|
The link between transportation and public health, explored on this page days ago, is plumbed further in a report released today by PolicyLink and the Prevention Institute with an introduction by Jim Oberstar (D-MN), chairman of the House transport committee. The report brings together the key pivot points in the transportation debate, many of which […]

How — and When — Can D.C. Help Local Transport Reform Happen?

|
A map of the areas served by transport MPOs, pictured in color. (Photo: NARC via Kaid Benfield) In a new op-ed for Citiwire, former Indianapolis mayor and GOP member of Congress Bill Hudnut suggests six ways that Washington can train the nation’s 350-plus metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) into tools for smart and environmentally sound transportation […]