Compromise or Concession: Congress Faces Tough Transport Choices

Health care and transportation funding are very different items on Congress’ to-do list, but the Washington Post’s assessment of the former issue fits the latter as well: Lawmakers return today from a month-long recess to find a political landscape that has barely shifted from the impasse of late July.

Sen. George Voinovich (R-OH) (Photo: UPI)

Jim Oberstar (D-MN), chairman of the House transportation committee, continues to press for action on a six-year infrastructure measure with a $450 billion price tag that has no matching source of revenue.

Meanwhile, the Obama administration is pushing for an 18-month extension of current law that would delay broader reform until 2011.

Oberstar counts many allies on his committee — and even House leaders are sympathetic to his cause — but a July letter urging Democrats to find a way to pay for his six-year bill “as soon as possible” was not signed by 10 members of the pivotal Ways and Means panel, which controls the bill’s revenue source.

With a September 30 deadline for action on federal transport policy, the biggest question may be whether the Obama administration is willing to compromise with Oberstar and like-minded House members on a shorter-term stopgap.

Sen. George Voinovich (R-OH), one of a small group in the upper chamber that has not sided with the White House in favor of an 18-month delay, has not given up on his proposal for a 12-month extension of current law. In a newsletter for his constituents published over the Labor Day weekend, Voinovich wrote:

Across the country,
Americans are still hurting. In our home state of Ohio, where unemployment
currently stands at 11.2 percent, people are asking, Where are the jobs?

Folks should know
that some of their elected leaders are actively joining the Obama administration in its quest to blow yet another golden opportunity when
it comes to creating jobs and stimulating the economy: they are refusing
to support a robust new highway bill. …

[After aligning with Oberstar] I offered an amendment at an Environment and Public
Works (EPW) Committee business meeting to shorten the length of the
proposed extension to 12 months and keep the pressure on Congress to
invest in our nation’s roads and bridges, meet America’s surface transportation
needs, and create thousands of jobs. Those few months could make the
world of difference when it comes to job creation, yet the amendment
failed by a vote of 8 to 11.

My proposal for a
12-month extension is a reasonable compromise; the House is opposed to
any type of extension. They understand the urgency of the situation
we face.

Oberstar and the White House held fast to their positions in July, which ended with lawmakers approving a $7 billion rescue for the nation’s cash-strapped highway trust fund that did not include extra transit money secured by several senators.

Given that the capital’s transportation stalemate remains largely the same in September, the next year or so of federal policymaking on the issue could depend on whether Oberstar and Voinovich assemble a workable coalition in favor of a shorter delay — or whether the administration wins over enough House Democrats to its side.