Tracking Transport Subsidies: As Tough as Following the Stimulus Money

The $787 billion economic stimulus effort was intended to be a model of government transparency -- but a privately run website called Recovery.org soon began beating out the government in the race to trace federal dollars. Now, as the Pew Charitable Trusts begins to expand its Subsidyscope fiscal monitoring project, some similar gaps in spending data are emerging.

(Photo: Fog City Journal)

A joint project of Pew and the nonprofit Sunlight Foundation, Subsidyscope began its work with the financial bailout and plans to release a map of the government's transportation studies by this fall.

But as the site's researchers noted in a recent release, some major pieces of the puzzle are missing from USASpending.gov, the online federal-finances monitor created in 2006 by legislation with a notable champion: then-Sen. Barack Obama:

Two sizable pieces of the nation's transport industry were altered in government spending records, Subsidyscope found -- Amtrak's 2008 budget was mysteriously halved, and the entire budget for the Merchant Marine Academy was missing.

Those discrepancies represent more than just a failure to comply with the spirit of Obama's 2006 transparency law; they also underscore the daunting task of attempting to reform transportation policy in an age of mammoth imbalance between federal support for highways and transit, as well as an ingrained resistance to changing existing patterns of infrastructure investment.

The government's thicket of counterproductive agriculture subsidies has been well-mapped by groups on the right and the left, and Congress has still resisted any attempt to trim the system. Given Subsidyscope researchers' difficulty in getting their arms around transportation spending data, cutting subsidies in that sector is likely to be even more challenging.