The Peculiar Federalism of Transit Safety: No National Standards Exist

The recent crash of two D.C. Metro trains has laid bare a glaring lack of authority at the obscure local committee that is supposed to ensure transit riders’ safety, as the Washington Post reported today. But the problem is bigger than the nation’s capital: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) has not issued broad safety rules for rail transit, leaving the issue in the hands of state oversight agencies.

reagan_metro_station.jpgThe state agency overseeing safety on this D.C. Metro train has almost one full-time employee, according to the Washington Post. (Photo: VisitingDC.com)

The Obama administration plans to reform this federalist approach to transit safety, which has allowed the D.C. Metro to postpone installation of a backup train monitoring system suggested by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).

Aside from California’s 12-person oversight panel, the average state safety agency has less than one full-time employee, FTA chief Peter Rogoff said last week.

Meanwhile, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) recently ruled that "positive train control" crash protection systems must be in use on commuter and inter-city passenger rail systems — though it lacks the power to extend that mandate to rail transit.

"What’s more important
than whether the FTA [sets national safety standards] or whether the FRA does it is that someone
does it who has the teeth and the authority and the funding and the
personnel to really compel the attention of the transit agencies," Rogoff told the Senate Banking Committee.

Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) introduced legislation two weeks ago that would authorize the U.S. DOT to begin setting national safety guidelines for rail transit. In her speech introducing the bill, Mikulski said she was responding to an NTSB briefing she received after the D.C. Metro crash on June 22.

This is when I learned the NTSB had recommended that the … FTA establish federal standards for metro
systems but the FTA had not taken action. Apparently, the FTA doesn’t
think it has this authority. Well, my
bill fixes that.

But how does the American Public Transportation Association (APTA), which represents the
nation’s transit networks, view the prospect of federal oversight? APTA President William Millar told the Post he was wary of "throw[ing] the
baby out with the bath water," given that transit remains far safer than car travel, but he refrained from weighing in on the Mikulski bill.

Late Update: APTA spokeswoman Virginia Miller told Streetsblog Capitol Hill that the group "has not yet taken a position on whether or not the FTA should have regulatory oversight" but plans to work with Congress and the administration "to continue to improve safety in an already very safe industry."

Miller also cited U.S. DOT data that showed a 0.03 percent per-passenger fatality rate for every 100 million miles traveled on transit between 2002 and 2008. For autos, the fatality rate was 0.87 percent — or 29 times higher.

  • Future Schema

    If the Federal government is pumping billions into public transit then it should have at least a modicum of safety requirements for those systems and some role in the oversight of the systems that it funds. If it gets Federal dollars, it has to meet the Federal standards. Its amazing that given the Byzantine approvals process for transit funding, the FTA does not oversee key aspects of its investments.

  • Ge8TU7 nuonsyrphmpi, [url=http://ssvumdndakuw.com/]ssvumdndakuw[/url], [link=http://bwklhxrgciay.com/]bwklhxrgciay[/link], http://pxkdezotosxq.com/

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

House to Tackle Transit Safety Gaps in December Hearing

|
The debate over setting national standards for transit safety — which the federal government has yet to do — will take center stage at a December 8 hearing of the House transportation committee’s transit panel. The D.C. Metro (Photo: WaPo) The lack of nationwide rules for transit safety has become an acute concern in Washington […]

Obama Aide Defends Transit Safety Plan as Different from Rail Rules

|
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) chief Peter Rogoff today mounted a defense of the White House’s transit safety plan, assuring some skeptical members of Congress that he does not want to "replicate" inter-city rail safety rules that have taken flak for impeding the development of viable U.S. train networks. As of last year, D.C.’s Metro had […]

Will Federal Oversight Help or Hinder DC Transit?

|
The feds have taken over safety oversight of D.C.’s embattled Metro, and that could actually be cause for concern, says David Alpert at Greater Greater Washington. U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx laid out his vision for safety-related reforms under the aegis of the Federal Transit Administration in a recent piece in the Washington Post. One person was killed when smoke filled […]

Proposed Federal Transit Safety Regs Under Scrutiny From House Panel

|
In June 2009, a fatal crash on the D.C. Metro prompted federal lawmakers to consider adding a new layer of transit safety oversight. Senator Barbara Mikulski, a Maryland Democrat, introduced the National Metro Safety Act of 2009 to establish national safety standards for transit systems. It was never enacted, but it certainly raised the issue’s profile, and Transportation […]

White House Unveils Transit Safety Bill to Cautious Praise on the Hill

|
Lawmakers on the House transportation committee today greeted details of the Obama administration’s transit safety plan with approval, but some sounded skeptical notes about the costs of state compliance with new federal rules even as transit agencies cope with billions of dollars in maintenance and repair backlogs. Washington D.C.’s transit safety oversight agency has less […]