NGOs Work to Fill Transit-Oriented Development Void

cycle.jpgToday the Tri-State Transportation Campaign joined the One Region Funders’ Group* and The Fund for New Jersey in announcing a grant program to foster metro area transit-oriented development.

The program intends to encourage transit oriented development, or mixed use development within a fourth to half mile of a train or bus station, by offering financial support to municipalities ready to address the linkages between affordable housing, energy efficiency and development near transit stations. Up to ten small grants will be awarded to communities across downstate New York and Connecticut. Up to five grants will be awarded in New Jersey.

The grants, according to a TSTC press release, will be awarded to help fund project planning and design. While the state of New Jersey and New Jersey Transit have had TOD funding programs in place since the 1990s, resulting in a number of projects including the Transit Village Initative, New York and Connecticut have not kept pace. Last spring the MTA announced a new plan to encourage TOD development, but has so far not followed through with a formal program. The New York State Department of Transportation, meanwhile, has come up with a "smart growth" web site, and not much else. Connecticut has embraced TOD concepts, but has also been slow to realize a blueprint for carrying them out.

In addition to filling state TOD gaps, the non-profit grants will ideally bring more of a focus on environmentally sound, affordable development. Says TSTC’s Kate Slevin: "It makes total sense to include affordable housing near your transit stations."

To this point, Slevin says, much TOD housing has been targeted at high-income buyers.

By putting homes and businesses near public transportation, transit-oriented development is of course considered a crucial element in reducing auto dependence and its attendant health and environmental impacts. For more, check out TSTC’s new online TOD clearinghouse.

* The One Region Funders’ Group includes the Fairfield County Community Foundation, Long Island Community Foundation, New York Community Trust, Rauch Foundation, Surdna Foundation, Emily Hall Tremaine Foundation, and Westchester Community Foundation.

Image: Tri-State Transportation Campaign

  • JK

    Most of the Hudson towns served by MetroNorth require large amounts of parking near newly built amenities like restaurants, stores etc. This results in space gobbling, unwalkable, car dependent, box in parking field development. It’s a disaster. More than tax incentives or grants, the transit oriented towns need to eliminate their counter productive parking requirements and start intelligently pricing existing curb and off-street parking. It is simply impossible to build TOD with existing parking requirements. Also, limiting TOD to a 1/4 to 1/2 mile of a train stop is a joke. The range should be a minimum of 1/2 mile to 3/4 mile, a mile would be better. Americans used to know how to walk. They can learn again.

  • To this point, Slevin says, much TOD housing has been targeted at high-income buyers.

    High-income buyers who will not want to completely surrender the status of car ownership, and thus will require parking. That’s the thinking that the developers and planners have, because they can’t imagine giving up car ownership themselves. But of course, there are plenty of high-income buyers out there who would be quite happy without owning a car. We just need to convince the developers and planners of that. And get them to provide some TOD for medium and low-income buyers. Renters too.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

New Jersey Transit Village Program Continues to Grow

|
Image: Town of Somerville The holy grail for many urbanists contemplating long-term development and growth trends is the transit village. Adding growth adjacent to functional transit has the benefit of making it easier for the new population there to drive less and use transit for a multitude of trips. Likewise, transit villages can add to […]

The Good Problem With Housing Near Transit: It’s Almost Too Popular

|
Local officials are catching on to the power of transit-oriented development to transform quality of life while decreasing congestion, as my colleague Ryan Avent has explored. But now that the federal government is starting to explore how to expand transit-accessible housing, an intriguing problem is arising: it’s almost too popular. Transit-oriented development in Jersey City, […]

3 Bright Prospects for a Better Transportation Bill

|
Yesterday we reported on some of the terrible amendments that might get tacked on to the House transportation bill this week. But there are also some good ideas with bipartisan support among the hundreds of amendments submitted by members of the House. Here are three amendments that have the potential to improve transportation policy in the U.S. — should legislators give […]

What L.A.’s 30/10 Plan Could Mean for Transit Funding Nationwide

|
From around the Network today, a potential transit funding breakthrough, the unequal impacts of air pollution and a state steps back from TOD: What If L.A.’s Transit Acceleration Campaign Goes National? Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa was on Capitol Hill this week promoting his city’s “30/10” plan as a model for boosting transit expansion around […]

The Case for Letting States, Not Cities, Shape Development Near Transit

|
A bill circulating in the Connecticut legislature — HB 6851 — would give state officials greater control over development near transit stations. The measure has met with some resistance because it would weaken powers that have traditionally belonged to local government. But Sandy Johnston at Network blog Itinerant Urbanist says that in Connecticut’s case, that’s probably a […]