London Reaps Pricing Benefits

488042267_0d517c6b6b.jpg

From the newsletter of the Tri-State Transportation Campaign comes an inspiring summation of the effects of congestion pricing in London since the program’s inception in 2003, gleaned from Transport for London‘s annual report:

  • Traffic levels in central London were about 20% lower in 2006 than in 2002, the year before pricing began.
  • Bicycle use in central London rose 43% in the same time period.
  • Since the implementation of the plan, congestion has been about 30% lower than it would be under a "without congestion pricing" scenario.
  • Traffic on major roads in neighborhoods directly outside of the pricing zone has decreased each year since the implementation of congestion pricing.
  • The central London economy has outperformed London’s economy as a whole since the implementation of congestion pricing. While this cannot be attributed to congestion pricing, given the many other factors affecting the economy, there is no evidence to suggest that congestion pricing has hurt business in central London.

The TSTC also makes a good point about how well the folks over in the UK handled the public-relations aspect of traffic policy:

City officials, take note: Transport for London used a 14-month, three-stage multimedia campaign to explain the nuances of congestion pricing–how charges were paid, how exemptions could be applied for, and so on. Today, London still uses advertisements to raise awareness of the plan’s benefits.

Photo: Laura Callan/Flickr

  • Obviously it’s just a matter of time before London admits they made a mistake and goes back to the drawing board. What a waste of time and money!

    I hope in the future they will consider the full range of ideas put forth by our crack team of congestion pricing denial folks.

  • Larry Littlefield

    This is the only “study” that matters. One can make a model say just about anything, depending on the assumptions. But the assumptions aren’t any good without data, and the only data is from London and Stockholm.

  • Red

    That third point is an important one. Some anti-pricing folks have claimed that congestion is on the rise in London, which is true. But that’s largely because in 2006 there was a highly abnormal amount of street construction in the London CBD (according to the report) which impacted congestion. What the report points out is that without congestion pricing things would be far worse.

  • Good. Now, imagine no autos.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Congestion Pricing: Does New York Have the Will?

|
Brad Aaron reports: Political will, holistic planning, centralized management. That’s what Malcolm Murray-Clark says it takes to implement an effective congestion pricing plan. He should know. The Director of Congestion Charging at Transport for London (TfL) oversees a program that is as ambitious as it is successful — a program that went from idea to […]

Queens Chamber Continues Campaign Against Congestion Pricing

|
Foes of congestion pricing marshalled by the Queens Chamber of Commerce held a press conference yesterday at which several politicians from the borough took a stand against the mayor’s plan. According to a press release provided by the chamber, City Council Finance Chair David Weprin called the proposal unnecessary: "I don’t think City Hall understands […]

Pricing Advocates Call for Impact Study and New Parking Policies

|
Congestion pricing advocate Carolyn Konheim and consulting partner Brian Ketcham are advising the Bloomberg administration to drop its resistance to a congestion pricing Environmental Impact Study. The two say a study is needed to head off "likely 11th hour litigation" aimed at stopping the three-year pilot program from taking effect, a possibility Streetsblog alluded to […]

Resolved: More Traffic Congestion & Automobile Dependence

|
Brooklyn City Councilmember Lew Fidler and a small group of his outer borough colleagues have put forward Resolution 774 "calling upon the Mayor of New York City to oppose the institution of any form of congestion pricing." The resolution is based on a March 2006 report commissioned by the Queens Chamber of Commerce that was, […]

Livingstone: Businesses Led on Congestion Charge

|
  Fearing that London’s ever-worsening traffic congestion would drive industry to other European cities, business leaders first broached the topic of congestion charging for the British capital, according to plan architect Mayor Ken Livingstone. At a C40 Climate Summit panel entitled "Beating Congestion & Surviving Your Next Election," Livingstone said Tuesday that the business group […]

John Liu Says He Supports Congestion Pricing

|
Some actual news came out of this morning’s congestion pricing forum with London Deputy Mayor Nicky Gavron, the one event that Streetsblog’s reporting team decided to skip this week. Queens City Council Member John Liu publicly stated that he supports congestion pricing. New York Times reporter Sewell Chan reports for the EmpireZone blog: Mr. Liu, […]