DC’s Car-Sharing Fee: A Case Study in Bad Parking Policy

Car-sharing is an all-around great deal for cities. According to research from UC Berkeley [PDF], each shared car removes 14 from the road. It cuts down on carbon emissions [PDF]. Car-sharing users even spend more at local businesses [PDF].

In a grand gesture in bad parking policy, DC is levying a steep parking fee on its car-sharing fleet. Photo: ##http://thecityfix.com/blog/time-to-rethink-a-backward-policy-for-carsharing/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=time-to-rethink-a-backward-policy-for-carsharing## The City Fix##

You would think cities would be bending over backward to welcome these communal vehicles. But Washington, D.C. has imposed a steep parking fee on the city’s car sharing fleet. At $200 to $400 per month, the cost will add about $1 to $2 to the price of using a car.

Clayton Lane at Network blog The City Fix explains why this policy is so flawed:

DDOT, rather than levy a 20 percent tax on carsharing members whose behavior benefits the neighborhood, should keep carsharing affordable and instead tax private car use – the main source of congestion and many environmental problems. DDOT could raise the same revenue with a painless $2 annual fee for all residential parking tags. Or it could simply charge $100 annually for each household’s second car. Or implement smart meters, which vary prices based on real-time demand, ensuring that around 15 percent of commercial on-street parking spaces remain available. In downtown Redwood City, Calif., smart meters generate $1 million of additional revenue each year for safer, cleaner sidewalks.

The worst part is that car owners will continue to park on-street virtually for free. Annual tags will still cost $15 per household, with the second car parking totally free. Why should carsharing members pay market rates for on-street parking, while car owners get a subsidy? It’s totally backward policy.

Donald Shoup, in his seminal book, “The High Cost of Free Parking,” estimates the market value of on-street spaces in central Los Angeles at $31,000 each – more valuable than the vehicles parked in them. Subsidizing car ownership with free parking distorts the market, encouraging more people to own and drive cars. As Shoup says, everyone pays for free parking – except the driver. Now in D.C., sadly, even carsharing members will.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Mobilizing the Region reports that Nassau County has a $26 million surplus, just enough to keep afloat the Long Island Bus service it claims it can’t afford. The Atlanta Bicycle Coalition brings word that locals have taken up “tactical urbanism” to demonstrate the need for more public space. And Grid Chicago says that new bike lanes just keep appearing in the Windy City.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Tesla’s Vision for the Future of Autonomous Cars Should Scare Us

|
What impact will self-driving cars have on cities? The range of potential outcomes is enormous. In the best-case scenario, private car ownership gives way to shared fleets of autonomous cars, freeing up vast amounts of land that used to be devoted to vehicle storage. Then there’s the scenario promoted by Tesla, in which everyone owns their personal autonomous […]

How Portland (Maine) Pairs Car-Share With Parking Reform

|
Is your city skittish about reducing parking minimums? Here’s one way to ease people into the idea that new buildings shouldn’t be forced to include lots of parking along with housing, and it comes from Portland — Maine. Network blog Rights of Way reports that this city of 66,000 pairs the reduction of parking mandates with the expansion […]

How the Accommodations We Make for Cars Impose Huge Costs on Cities

|
Wide highways, big parking lots, dangerous intersections designed for speed — there are a lot of downsides to all this car-centric infrastructure, including the way it saps the fiscal health of cities. Bill Lindeke at Network blog Streets.mn lists seven, from the erosion of the local tax base due to land consumed for highways to public health costs in the form of […]

Oakland Forging Ahead With New Ideas for Transportation

|
It’s exciting times in Oakland, California. In the past six weeks, Oakland has passed a raft of policies that promise to have a lasting effect on the city’s future transportation and development. This is all being done as part of the city government’s reorganization, creating a new Department of Transportation to better strategize and coordinate […]