Talking Headways Podcast: OMG Enough About Millennials Already

podcast icon logoJeff is back from Rail~volution with all the highlights from the sessions he skipped because he was deep in conversation in the hallways. Isn’t that what conferences are for? We discuss what we do and don’t get out of these big meetings.

We also get into CityLab‘s examination of the gap between public support for transit spending and actual transit ridership, and we bring in some illuminating survey results from Transit Center [PDF] (and of course, The Onion) to shed light on what the people want from their transit systems. And we agree: While millennials are an important cohort to look at as we examine changing trends in transportation habits, good lord we are sick of talking about them

Stay tuned till the end of the podcast for Jeff’s rundown of the conferences you can still attend this season — there are, according to his count, 50 bajillion more. Pick one and go skip all the sessions and hang out in the hallways like the cool kids.

And hang out with us by subscribing to Talking Headways on our RSS feedStitcher or iTunes.

The comments section awaits your contribution to our witty repartee.

  • Ken

    First off, I love this podcast. Many thanks to Tanya and Jeff for taking the time and effort to put together this thought-provoking resource and for offering it to me (essentially) free of charge. I’m not a transportation person or a planning person by trade (I work in public health), so I’ve learned a great deal about transit & planning issues from this podcast. I have found their approach to be informative, challenging at times (in a good way) and accessible.

    Secondly, I’m glad they brought up the topic of age and transit in the most recent podcast. I support their desire to extend the conversation beyond the Millenial generation. I, for one, would love to hear more about the ways in which national and global demographics influence transit usage (whenever they cover issues related to transit and planning in relation to age, race, poverty, etc. I find myself particularly engaged).

    Finally, I (respectfully) think the last podcast may have missed a little bit of an opportunity. I felt that, in an effort to present the ‘alternative’ viewpoint that focuses attention explicitly on millenials, Tanya set up a bit of a false choice: that we should focus on millenials because they’re the future and they’ll be around for years to come whereas baby boomers are going to start dying off pretty soon. The fact of the matter is, baby boomers are going to be around and influencing the economy for a long time to come – maybe not for as many decades as the millenials, but certainly for decades.

    At one point in the podcast Tanya said that the focus on millenials “helps us”, which I took to mean that it promotes an agenda that is pro-transit and pro-walkability. It seems to me that an age-inclusive approach could view the aging of the boomers as being inherently pro-transit and pro-walkability, as well. I don’t just mean the “bohemian” boomers who may choose to buy a loft downtown because they identify with the ethos of new urbanism. I mean all boomers – peeople who need to get around and who will, eventually, have to retire from driving. Walkable spaces with access to usable transit is good for people who can’t drive for health reasons, as well as people who don’t drive for economic or political reasons.

    This gets to a broader point, which is that the baby boomers are just the beginning. Our country is undergoing a gradual demographic change known as population aging – in which there will be more older adults relative to younger adults and children. Population aging will influence things in many ways (from public finance to the types of products being purchased to the delivery of social services). And it won’t end with the baby boomers because once population aging is here, it will be here to stay for a long time. For instance, millenials will eventually be – like the baby boomers are now – a huge cohort of individuals about to retire. A transit system that meets the needs of aging baby boomers will probably meet the needs of aging millenials, too.

    This all gets at the concept of universal design – designing products and environments that meet the needs of the greatest number of possible users.
    I think the point Tanya and Jeff were both ultimately getting at is: if the goal is to shift our society’s focus to more sustainable forms of transportation and development, why focus on age when good design works well for everyone? This is the essence of universal design. And, in light of the fact that so much of these transportation decisions are made by political officials (on some level or another), it seems logical that a bigger umbrella is going to be more successful than a movement arbitrarily divided along age (or any other) lines.

    Thanks, again, to Tanya and Jeff for a great podcast. And I welcome any comments.


Talking Headways Podcast: What Is the Structure of Your City?

At last month’s Rail~Volution conference I caught up with Houston Metro board member Christof Spieler. Hear from Christof about the progress on Houston’s bus reimagining and his tips for public engagement and transit system planning. We also discuss route alignments for bus and rail lines and the importance of good data when making decisions about transit systems.

Talking Headways Podcast: A Positive Vibe For Chicago TOD

On this week’s podcast, Yonah Freemark of the Metropolitan Planning Council (you may know him from The Transport Politic) shares the scoop on transit-oriented development in Chicago. In a recent post, Yonah writes that in order to break the pattern of slow growth but ever-increasing demand, more development should happen near Chicago’s extensive transit system. We talk about why […]

Talking Headways Podcast: Houston, Transit Paradise?

Welcome to a super-long extra-bonus episode of Talking Headways! We only took on two topics this week, but we got so enthralled by both of them we just couldn’t shut up. First, we talked to Christof Spieler, a member of Houston Metro, about the “blank-sheet” bus overhaul he helped design. Instead of trying to tweak the […]

Talking Headways: Urbanism in the Style of Gangnam

Guest host Randy Simes, owner of and headlines writer for Streetsblog Ohio, joins me from South Korea to give his thoughts on his current home in the Gangnam district of Seoul and his previous one in Atlanta. We cover Keith Parker’s turnaround of Atlanta’s transit agency MARTA, the Belt Line and the people who won’t […]