Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Parking

Why Is St. Louis Using Tax Money to Subsidize Parking Lots and Bars?

1:00 PM EDT on August 15, 2013

St. Louis' subsidized "Ballpark Village" looks suspiciously like a giant parking lot. But the Cardinals say it's only until the market proves it can sustain the original mixed-use plan. Image: Riverfront Times
St. louis' subsidized "Ballpark Village" looks suspiciously like a giant parking lot. But developers say that is only temporary. Image: ##blogs.riverfronttimes.com/dailyrft/2013/08/cardinals_ballpark_village_scott_ogilvie.php## Riverfront Times##

Tax increment financing is a pretty neat tool cities can use to finance quality-of-life amenities, like the Beltline in Atlanta, or the streetcar in Kansas City, by capturing the taxes from the property value increases of the investments.

"Ballpark Village" was originally envisioned as a mixed-use neighborhood. Image: Riverfront Times. Click to enlarge.
"Ballpark Village" was originally envisioned as a mixed-use neighborhood. Image: ##blogs.riverfronttimes.com/dailyrft/2013/08/cardinals_ballpark_village_scott_ogilvie.php## Riverfront Times##

On the other hand, there's a new model being pioneered by St. Louis, where you use special financing to subsidize the construction of parking lots and bars. That's the plan for "Ballpark Village," a once-soaring vision for a mixed-use neighborhood by the Cardinals' stadium in downtown St. Louis. But then came the housing crisis, and following revision after revision, that plan has morphed into little more than a giant field of asphalt. The plan now includes 400 parking spaces and a single building that will house the "Cardinals Hall of Fame Museum" and a restaurant.

But St. Louis is still on the hook for special tax revenues to be delivered right back to developers. Alderman Scott Ogilvie told the Riverfront Times the city is getting hosed.

"Every time they sell a beer at these bars, they are keeping most of that tax revenue to pay for the construction," he said. "You have to be smart about what you're subsidizing."

"It's not like we're desperate for places to drink in St. Louis so we have to subsidize it and create more," said Ogilvie. "What improves downtown, what makes downtown great is more housing options and quality jobs. The housing component has been completely stripped out."

Ron Watermon, a spokesman for the St. Louis Cardinals -- the land owner -- defended the plans, saying the parking-heavy proposal was just a holding strategy till they could pursue the grander vision for a "really vibrant neighborhood." He added that it would need to be "market driven." The Cardinals are contracting with private developer Cordish Companies on the project.

"It's always good to have additional parking downtown," he said.

Unless, of course, you actually live downtown and have to look at it. Readers at Next STL joked the development should be called "CarPark Village."

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Why We Care About Some Transportation Tragedies More Than Others

Why do we respond to major transportation disasters with so much urgency — and why don't we count our collective car crash epidemic among them?

March 28, 2024

The Toll of History: MTA Board Approves $15 Congestion Pricing Fee

New York City's first-in-the-nation congestion pricing tolls are one historic step closer to reality after Wednesday's 11-1 MTA board vote. Next step: all those pesky lawsuits.

March 28, 2024

Take Thursday’s Headlines Home, Country Roads

Heat Map reports on why rural Americans are resisting electric vehicles, and why it might not matter much for the climate.

March 28, 2024
See all posts