UPDATE: Here We Go Again: Sen. Rand Paul Pits Bikes Against Bridges

Rand Paul is at it again.

Last year, Sen. Paul (R-KY) made a laughingstock of himself by alleging that the Transportation Enhancements program — which largely funds bicycle and pedestrian improvements — was used for things like “turtle tunnels and squirrel sanctuaries and all this craziness.”

We love squirrel sanctuaries as much as the next person, but they have nothing to do with the Transportation Alternatives program. Photo: ##http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/15000348##BBC##

His statements had no basis in fact, but that didn’t matter. He and other Republicans were so hell-bent on killing the TE program that they nearly brought the negotiations over a new authorization bill to a grinding halt. What emerged, after a hard-fought compromise, was an under-funded, watered-down Transportation Alternatives program. And now Paul wants to kill that too.

His amendment [PDF] to the Transportation and HUD appropriations bill, before the Senate today, would put all TA funding toward bridge repair.

Bridge repair certainly could use some help, seeing as MAP-21 dramatically shrunk the amount of money earmarked for keeping the nation’s bridges in safe operating condition. But Sen. Paul’s idea of a solution is beyond misguided. Half of TA funds go directly to the hands of local communities to use as they wish, a process any devolutionist fiscal conservative should appreciate. The other half can be frittered away on anything a state wants, if the state chooses to transfer the money out of TA and into other programs.

Notably, Kentucky has chosen not to transfer its Transportation Alternatives funds to other purposes — meaning Paul’s amendment would reverse a decision the state has made.

Indeed, TA’s intended use for active transportation projects should be the pet issue of every conservative in Congress — more people biking and walking means less expenditures on roads, health care, or environmental mitigation. And it gives people the freedom to move about freely without the burden of enormous gas and automobile expenses. What could be more American than that?

“Taking that small amount of funding away would dangerously undermine efforts in our cities, towns and counties to provide safe and efficient transportation options for everyone,” said the League of American Bicyclists in a statement. “With rates of bicycling and walking fatalities on the rise, that is a trade we can’t afford to make.”

Plus, by proposing to get rid of Transportation Alternatives funding and put it into the bridge repair grant program, he’s taking guaranteed money away from Kentucky and putting it into a competitive grant process where Kentucky will have to compete with every other state.

Kentucky has $952 million in bridge-related needs, according to FHWA. The state gets less than $13 million in Transportation Alternatives money. That means it would take Kentucky 74 years of TA funding to repair its bridges.

Update 2:07 p.m.: As the initial version of this article reported, the amendment has been “ordered to lie on the table,” which apparently, contrary to what the Internet told me, is not the same as “tabled.”

13 thoughts on UPDATE: Here We Go Again: Sen. Rand Paul Pits Bikes Against Bridges

  1. I love faux fiscal conservatism. Paul and Christie should hang out and talk about how pumping hoards of government dollars into road and highway projects is perfectly fine, but when it’s for transit, bike, or ped projects, it’s “wasteful government spending”.

  2. Oh if only we didn’t subsidize driving so much, there’d be plenty of money in the federal budget for safe routes to schools, sidewalks, and bike lanes.

  3. Last year, Sen. Paul (R-KY) made a laughingstock of himself…

    Ridiculous. That clown has made a laughingstock of himself many, many times since then.

  4. If there is only enough money for one bridges or bike lanes what to choose. choices choices. I know, bridges. Gosh that was a really hard decisions.

    Whenever a bridge fall and people die everyone wonder why no one fixed it. Someone actually wants to fix bridges, but people just want to complain.

  5. Whenever a cyclist is killed everyone wonders why no one made a bike lane. Someone actually wants to make a bike lane, but people just want to complain.

  6. it’s not an either or. The best thing about bike infrastructure is that it’s cheap (compared to bridges and highways) and often the same republicans decrying bike/pedestrian spending do not prioritize state of good repair but expansion of highways

  7. If the feds weren’t dumping billions into new highway construction and generally incentivising it for the states, maybe you’d have a point. But to keep doing that and at the same time cut the tiny amount of money that goes toward bike and ped infrastructure — of which there is a serious lack — is nonsensical and hypocritical.

  8. “TA’s intended use for active transportation projects should be the pet issue of every conservative in Congress — more people biking and walking means less expenditures on roads, health care, or environmental mitigation.”

    But that requires the false belief that conservatives are capable of rational, logical thought about complicated problems that require long-term solutions…

  9. Liberals dont believe in Capitalism. If you want bike lanes, talk to your local gov. Dont go bumming the feds. Loser i love to ride but i refuse to take fed money. The feds always mismanage funds understand me?

  10. Whenever a cyclist is killed everyone wonders why they weren’t driving a car instead. Everyone knows roads were made for cars, but people just want to complain.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Stop Rand Paul’s Senseless Attack on Biking and Walking

The Senate is getting ready to produce a 2014 transportation budget, and national advocates like Transportation for America think it’s a pretty good package. Naturally, some senators are trying to sabotage it. As Tanya reported last week, Kentucky Republican Rand Paul has proposed an amendment that would transfer funds for biking and walking to bridge repair, where […]

Bike/Ped Funding Safe as Senate Rejects Rand Paul’s Amendment

Bike/ped funding is pitching a perfect game in the Senate after Republicans swung (and missed) at the popular Transportation Enhancements program for the third time in two months. The final strike came this morning, when Kentucky Republican Rand Paul’s amendment to divert all TE funds to bridge repair failed spectacularly, garnering only 38 votes in […]

GOP’s “Bridge Repair, Not Bike Lanes” Mantra Was Just a Lot of Hot Air

Last fall, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) proposed diverting all transportation enhancements funding, which goes primarily to bike and pedestrian projects, to bridge repair. “With nearly 25 percent of our nation’s bridges deemed either structurally deficient or functionally obsolete, we need to make their reconstruction a priority over errant beautification projects,” Sen. Paul said. He also […]

Streetsies 2011: Bums and Bummers

On our walk down the memory lane of 2011 so far, we’ve talked about some downers, some inspirations, some triumphs, and some struggles. Check out our first two installments of year-end Streetsie award nostalgia. Here’s some more. Best Obama Plan That Died a Slow and Horrible Death This Year: How to choose, when there were […]

Transportation Enhancements Program Beats Back Another Assault

A Republican lawmaker purporting to be acting out of budgetary concern has, once again, taken aim at a popular active transportation program — and, again, the Senate has rejected the effort. Senator John McCain (R-AZ) today offered an amendment that would have greatly restricted, but not reduced, funding for the national Transportation Enhancements program, which consumes just one-and-a-half […]