T4A Calls for Action Against Dreadful House Transpo Budget

Transportation for America is gearing up for a fight over transit, rail, and TIGER funding, and they’re asking supporters of smart transportation investments to make their voices heard.

The new budget put forth by the House of Representatives would zero out funds for TIGER, strip $400 million from Amtrak and raid $500 million from a fund for, of all things, repairing bridges.

The House and Senate have proposed two very different funding plans for transportation. Image: ##http://action.smartgrowthamerica.org/p/dia/action3/common/public/?action_KEY=14807##Transportation for America##

But cooler heads and clearer vision prevailed at the Senate, where appropriators put forward a budget that would expand funding for transit and TIGER. The Senate proposal would also help Amtrak keep up with growing demand.

Projects like the Atlanta streetcar and Chicago’s Blue Line rehab were made possible with the help of TIGER, an innovative, merit-based transportation funding program for which demand has been overwhelming. Eliminating TIGER would close off a vital mechanism to fund cost-effective projects that curb traffic, improve safety, and reduce car dependence.

Transportation for America calls the House budget “unabashedly bad” and has issued an action alert asking supporters to contact their Senators to support a budget that invests more in sensible transportation options.

10 thoughts on T4A Calls for Action Against Dreadful House Transpo Budget

  1. The House is always advancing preposterous proposals; do we have any sense that their transpo funding plan is being taken more seriously than, say, the perennial call to defund the National Endowment for the Arts?

  2. On the other hand, I’m guessing no dramatic cuts in road building. Or oil subsidies…need I continue?

  3. Amtrak’s record ridership = more passengers = more ticket sales = more revenue =

    …more Government subsidies?

    WTF!? Will it never end?

  4. John,

    I find myself wondering the same about highways and airplanes; when will the subsidies ever end?

    And their subsidies are much larger in total dollars than Amtrak’s are and make a much bigger dent in your wallet. Not to mention that those subsidies are the reason that Amtrak even exists. If the Government hadn’t interfered in the Free Market by subsidizing flying & driving, long distance passenger rail service would still be privately owned & operated and requiring zero subsidies.

  5. Parking, roads, and freeways = record traffic congestion ? tolls to collect revenues from polluting cars and drivers that require more more health care $$ … more Government subsidies? WTF!? Will it ever end? (doubtful given the entitlement perceived by motorists ..e.g., comment above)

  6. Amtrak needs to retool it’s long distance trains…those are the money bleeders

    The State supported corridors are doing quite well

  7. The state supported corridors are doing well BECAUSE they are state supported corridors. Take away the state support and you have failure.

  8. Jack,

    As much as it pains me to agree with John, as he and I rarely agree on anything, he is at least partially correct. The State supported corridors do look better in part because of the State Subsidies.

    This is not to say that all State supported corridors would look bad without State Support. For example, the State sponsored service between Lynchburg Va and DC is not only not being supported by the State of VA, it’s actually making an profit for the State. And the new service between Norfolk VA and DC covered 96% of its costs during its first 6 months of operations.

    And the fact that some of the trains do require support does not constitute failure. If making money and zero subsidies is the standard, then highways are a failure. And airlines are also a failure.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


How Will the House Answer the Senate’s Transportation Funding Bill?

The full Senate passed a major appropriations bill yesterday, including funding levels for transportation and housing. The Senate put the kibosh on Sen. Rand Paul’s attempt to strip bike/ped funding from the federal transportation program, as we reported yesterday. Here’s the lowdown on the bill as a whole. The upper chamber maintained funding for several key livability […]

Senate Offers a More Multi-Modal 2014 Transportation Budget Than the House

Last week, a House panel envisioned some big cuts to next year’s transportation budget. TIGER and high-speed rail would get nothing, Amtrak would get slashed, and ixnay on all that green “livability” crap. (And that’s practically a quote.) The Senate Appropriations Committee voted this morning on the budget its own transportation subcommittee put together, and the end […]

House Appropriators Leave TIGER, HSR Out of Next Year’s Budget

It’s always confusing when, in the middle of endless bicameral hand-wringing about transportation spending, the House Appropriations Committee puts out a budget for transportation without much ado. That’s what they did today. The Transportation and HUD Subcommittee will vote tomorrow on its draft budget, released today, in preparation to send it to the full Appropriations Committee. The […]

2012 Transpo Budget: Sustainable Communities and HSR Out, TIGER In

Remember those radically different appropriations bills passed by the House and the Senate? And how I said they’d never come together, and they probably would never pass a 2012 budget anyway because all Congress ever does anymore is extend previous budgets because they can’t agree on anything? Well, color me wrong. House and Senate members […]

Barbara Boxer’s Transportation Bill: Same As It Ever Was

The future of national transportation policy is pretty much like the present of national transportation policy, if the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has its way: underfunded and highway-centric. The bill released by Senator Barbara Boxer’s EPW Committee yesterday [PDF] rejects pretty much everything the Obama administration put forth in its bill, including permanent […]