When Hostile Streets Mar What Should Be a Walkable Trip

David Levinson lives just three blocks from St. Paul, Minnesota, but he almost never walks there. Standing in his way is a largely impassible highway and a series of sidewalk-deficient, glass-strewn streets.

It's only a mile long, but the trip from David Levinson's home to his son's favorite playground in St. Paul isn't a nice walk for the family. Image: ##http://www.streets.mn/2013/07/15/nobody-walks-to-saint-paul/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Streetsmn+%28streets.mn%29##Streets.mn##

At Streets.mn he recently described the treacherous walking journey to his children’s favorite playground, a mere 1.1 miles away:

Normally we drive (it might be a stop on part of a longer shopping trip, and is a good place for the kids to get their “yahs” out), but on one of the few pleasant weekend days of 2013, we walked. We used this route. It was filled with broken glass, uneven railroad tracks, and lack of sidewalks. It’s somewhat industrial, so its lack of aesthetics was not surprising, but it is hard to see the nature of the unwalkability from the car.

The walk will not be repeated. The reason for using this path is that the next shortest alternative crossed the Mn280 on and off-ramps, which were highly undesirable to walk on. We walked back via East River Parkway, but the distance (1.3 miles) while seemingly not much different, is both 0.5 miles longer round trip, more complex, and hillier. Even East River Parkway does not have sidewalks on both sides of the road, though the grassy strip is ok in the late spring. Ideally there would be a pedestrian crossing of I-94 at Emerald or Bedford to St. Anthony Avenue, but I suspect pedestrian demand is too low to warrant such a crossing (certainly it would not be anyone’s highest priority).

My conclusion from this is that (1) St. Paul hates Minneapolis and does not want any inter-municipal pedestrian travel, and/or (2) St. Paul doesn’t much like pedestrians.

Environments like this, all over America, help produce the sedentary lifestyles that contribute to the nationwide epidemic of obesity. And it’s also the kind of thing you barely notice unless you attempt the journey on foot.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Elly Blue explores one of the least-obvious and most costly aspects of car ownership: depreciation. Bike Delaware notes that “inattentional blindness” — the inability to notice things we don’t expect to see — helps explain why biking is safer when more cyclists are on the streets. And the Missouri Bike Federation encourages readers to take action against the proposed “South County Connector” highway project in St. Louis.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

The 10 Best and Worst Cities to Catch a Bus to Work

|
It’s been called “the geography of opportunity.” And David Levinson is trying to make a science of it. In a new analysis, Levinson, a University of Minnesota transportation engineering professor, and his colleague Andrew Owen have ranked the 50 largest U.S. metro areas based on job accessibility by transit [PDF]. Levinson and Owen used transit schedules and walking […]

A Better Way to Grade City Transportation Systems

|
How should we grade America’s transportation systems? The big, headline-grabbing transportation metric right now is the Texas Transportation Institute’s Urban Mobility Report, which holds up the lack of congestion as the ultimate sign of a well-functioning transportation system. By that measure, cities like Kansas City, Phoenix, and Detroit — where car commutes can be free-flowing […]

What If We Paid the Full Cost of Driving?

|
Driving is too cheap in the United States. It’s a complicated thing to unpack, but David Levinson, engineering professor at the University of Minnesota and blogger at the Transportationist, attempted to analyze the cost per-minute. Levinson estimates that the true cost of driving — including vehicle purchase price, insurance, taxes, repairs, and costs like parking and […]

The Diminishing Returns of Highway Building

|
Today on the Streetsblog Network, David Levinson at the Transportationist presents some interesting explanations about why so much American road building is a poor use of funds: We are not building much new transportation in the US not just because the costs are too high, but because the benefits are too low. When we were much younger […]